Home⇛International Research Journal of Science, Technology, Education, and Management⇛vol. 3 no. 1 (2023)

Integrating STEM education: A comprehensive framework for analyzing mathematics classrooms at a primary school

Huey Lei | Tony Li | Janice Ao

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This paper presents an overview of a STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) project implemented at a primary school in Macao SAR, that integrated pedagogical consideration on a rocket building competition. The project adopted an analytical tool as a theoretical framework for integrated STEM education. It exploited a modified analytical tool, grounded on the in-depth analysis of design, implementation, and evaluation of the project, called integrated STEM education framework in practice (iSTEMiP). The theme of the project covered space exploration combining a real-life problem and encouraging students to respond to manageable challenges. Its design focused on providing students with hands-on experience in integrating mathematics, engineering, and science knowledge within the exercise. For the participants of the project, a class of grade four students joined the STEM competition designed by a STEM team consisting of two teachers at the school. The students formed groups and were aided by the teaching team through instructional scaffolding, while the students constructed their own design rockets, step-by-step, integrating the acquired knowledge. Implementation of the project included the design stage of the rockets, group sharing activities, and the launch of the rockets. The major findings of the study discover students’ learning trajectories and teachers’ teaching flows by the critical features of the modified theory of iSTEMiP. Specifically, the mathematical concepts involving angles and projectiles were prominently shown to have been used from analyzing the work done by the students. Moreover, the study found that the participants expressed positivity toward the learning experience of the STEM project.



References:

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N.G., Hofstein, R.M., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiry in science education: international perspectives. Science Education, 88, 379-419.
  2. Abramovich, S., Burns, J., Campbell, S.W., & Grinshpan, A.Z. (2016). STEM education: Action learning in primary, secondary, and post-secondary mathematics. IMVI Open Mathematical Education Notes, 6, 65-106.
  3. Becker, K. & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education, 12(5 & 6), 23-37.
  4. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
  5. Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  6. Costa, M.C., Domingos, A.M.D., Teodoro, V.D., Vinhas, E.M.R.G. (2022). Teacher professional development in STEM education: An integrated approach with real-world scenarios in Portugal, Mathematics, 10, 3944. doi.org/10.3390/math10213944.
  7. Dulay, M.A.B. & Manuel, S.K.J. (2021). Emergency remote teaching experience: Challenges, actions and suggested measures of STEM research teachers in Pangasinan Philippines. International Research Journal of Science, Technology, Education, and Management, 1(2), 150-161. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5726572.
  8. Education and Youth Development Bureau (2016, February 29). General guides for the requirements of basic academic attainments at primary education level. https://www.dsedj.gov.mo/crdc/edu/requirements-e.html?timeis=Sat%20Apr%2003%2011:52:55%20GMT+08:00%202021&&
  9. Education and Youth Development Bureau (2020, July 27). Student assessment system for formal education of local education system. Retrieved from https://www.dsedj.gov.mo/~webdsej/www/edulaw/202007/download/Regulation_28_2020e.pdf
  10. English, L.D. & King, D. (2020). STEM learning through engineering design: fourth-grade students’ investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education 2(1). doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7.
  11. Fitzallen, N. (2015). STEM education: what does mathematics have to offer? In M. Marshman (eds.), Mathematics Education in the Margins. Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Sunshine Coast, June 28-July 2 (pp. 237-244). Sydney: MERGA.
  12. Garmire, E. & Person, G. (2006). Tech tally: approaches to assessing technological literacy. Washington, DC: The National Academics Press.
  13. Ghergulescu, I., Moldovan, A., Bratu, M., Muntean, C., & Muntean, G. (2019). A case study in STEM education for learners with special education needs. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on education and new learning technologies. doi.org/10152-10157. 10.21125/edulearn.2019.2539.
  14. Kelly, T.R., & Knowles, J.G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(11). doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z.
  15. Kennedy, T.J. & Odell, M.R.L. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246-258.
  16. Lei, H. & Hu, A. (2020). Designing a rich numeracy task in early childhood mathematics education: teaching addition in a kindergarten in Macao. Studies in Social Science Research. 2(1). https://doi.org/10.22158/sssr.v2n1p1.
  17. Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (2010). Thinking mathematically. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
  18. Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  19. Mert Uyangor, S. (2019). Investigation of the Mathematical Thinking Processes of Students in Mathematics Education Supported with Graph Theory. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(1), 1 - 9. doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070101
  20. Miller, J. (2019). STEM education in primary years to support mathematical thinking: using coding to identify mathematical structures and patterns. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51, 915-927. doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01096-y
  21. Moore, T., Stohlmann, M., Wang, H., Tank, K., Glancy, A., & Roehrig, G. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In S. Purzer, J. Strobel, & M. Cardella (eds.), Engineering in Pre-College Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices (pp. 35-60). West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.
  22. Nadelson, L., Seifert, A., Moll, A., & Coats, B. (2012). i-STEM summer institute: an integrated approach to teacher professional development in STEM. Journal of STEM Education, 13(2), 69-83.
  23. Norman, D.A. (1993). Cognition in the head and in the world: an introduction to the special issue on situated action. Cognitive Science, 17(1), 1-6.
  24. Nowikowski, S.H. (2017). Successful with STEM? A qualitative case study of pre-service teacher perceptions. Qualitative Report, 22, 2312-2333. doi.org/10.49743/2160-3715/2017.2893.
  25. Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The technology teacher, 68(4). 20-26.
  26. Turiman, P., Omar, j., Daud, A.M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110-116. doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253.
  27. Way, J., Preston, C., & Cartwright, K. (2022). STEM 1, 2, 3: Levelling up in primary schools. Education Sciences, 12, 827. doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110827.
  28. Wei, B. Science teacher education in Macau: a critical review. Asia-Pacific Science Education. 5(10). doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0036-9.
  29. Wilson, B.G. & Myers, K.M. (2000). Situated cognition in theoretical and practical context. In D.H. Jonassen & S.M. Land (eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 57-88). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
  30. Yanthi, N., Milama, B, Choirunnisa, H., & Yuliariatiningsih, M.S. (2019). STEM learning content in elementary school national curriculum. IOP Conference Series: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1318. doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012052.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic