Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 5 no. 9 (2024)

Strengthening TINA: Using Pugh Matrix and Kano Analysis to Improve Its Design Threshold and Performance Criteria

Antoniette M. Almaden | James D Pantinople | Lovenia M Ferrer | Laizame L Forrosuelo | Anthony Dave C Bongcales | Ralph Warren P Bastida | Cheradee Ann M Cabanlit

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Amidst the pandemic, the Teknoy-Inquiry Assistant (TINA) system was created to accommodate student institution–related questions while following the restrictions implemented by the government. Due to the rushed design, users experience untimely response problems when using the service. The research aims to investigate and propose improvements to the TINA system for the sustainability of the service. The researchers focused on the turn-around time for the replies to the questions in the TINA system. To further justify the importance of addressing the turn-around time of replies, the researchers also investigated the meaningful relationship between student satisfaction and response time. The researchers addressed and resolved the reply time using Kano Analysis. The research also used purposive sampling, using researcher-made survey questionnaires to find the relationship between student satisfaction and the timeliness of replies. With the help of the Pearson correlation coefficient, the researcher found a positive correlation between student satisfaction and reply time, with a positive correlation value of 0.4090. Since a positive correlation is found between student satisfaction and reply time, improving the turn-around time of reply certainly increases student satisfaction. Therefore, to improve TINA, the researchers advocate implementing its Artificial Intelligence Chatbot version to improve reply time. The research is the first to contribute to the Field of Technology and University Services within the local context since it may give practical suggestions on properly creating an Inquiry Assistant System among regional universities.



References:

  1. Aglibar, K. D., Alegre, G. C., Del Mundo, G., Du-ro, K. F., & Rodelas, N. (2022). Ticketing system: Descriptive research on the use of ticketing system for project manage-ment and issue tracking in its compa-nies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.06213. Retrieved on May 18, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.25147/ijcsr.2017.001.1.90
  2. Ashfaq, M., Yun, J., Yu, S., & Loureiro, S. M. C. (2020). I, Chatbot: Modeling the determi-nants of users’ satisfaction and continu-ance intention of AI-powered service agents. Telematics and Informatics, 54, 101473. Retrieved on May 18, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101473
  3. Caruelle, D., Lervik-Olsen, L., & Gustafsson, A. (2023). The clock is ticking—Or is it? Cus-tomer satisfaction response to waiting shorter vs. longer than expected during a service encounter. Journal of Retail-ing, 99(2), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2023.03.003
  4. Daengs G., & Istanti, E. (2022). The role of timeliness in improving customer satis-faction, customer loyalty of pt. Jne. IJEBD(International Journal of En-trepreneurship and Business Develop-ment), 5(2), 339–345. Retrieved on June 3, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.29138/ijebd.v5i2.1782
  5. Dawande, P. P., Wankhade, R. S., Akhtar, F. I., & Noman, O. (2022). Turnaround time: An efficacy measure for medical labora-tories. Cureus. Retrieved on May 17, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28824
  6. Dewi, S. K. (2019). Service quality assessment using servqual and kano models. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 20(1), 94–104. Retrieved on June 3, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.22219/JTIUMM.Vol20.No1.94-104
  7. Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sam-pling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. Retrieved on May 17, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  8. Firmansyah, A. (2023). THE EFFECT OF PRODUCT, BRAND ASSOCIATION, BRAND PERSONALITY AND ENDORSER IN INTENSE BUYING. Media Mahardhi-ka, 22(1), 41-47. Retrieved on June 2, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.29062/mahardika.v22i1.508
  9. Goldstein, K. (2024). Kano analysis: The kano model explained. Qualtrics. Retrieved on May 18, 2024, from https://www.qualtrics.com/experience-management/research/kano-analysis/
  10. Gupta, M., & Shri, C. (2018). Understanding customer requirements of corrugated in-dustry using Kano model. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Manage-ment, 35(8), 1653–1670. Retrieved on May 18, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-04-2017-0074
  11. Kermanshachi, S., Nipa, T. J., & Nadiri, H. (2022). Service quality assessment and enhancement using Kano model. PloS one, 17(2), e0264423. Retrieved on May 18, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293766
  12. Leal Filho, W., Lange Salvia, A., Abubakar, I. R., Mifsud, M., Azadi, H., Sharifi, A., Le-Vasseur, T., Luetz, J. M., Velazquez, L., Singh, P., Pretorius, R., Akib, N. A. M., Savelyeva, T., Brandli, L., Muthu, N., & Lombardi, P. (2022). Impacts of the covid-19 pandemic on routines of higher education institutions: A global perspec-tive. Sustainability, 14(21), 14105. Re-trieved on May 1, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114105.
  13. Madzík, P., Budaj, P., Mikuláš, D., & Zimon, D. (2019). Application of the kano model for a better understanding of customer re-quirements in higher education—A pilot study. Administrative Sciences, 9(1), 11. Retrieved on April 28, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9010011
  14. Naini, N. F., Santoso, S., Andriani, T. S., Claudia, U. G., & Nurfadillah, N. (2022). The effect of product quality, service quality, cus-tomer satisfaction on customer loyal-ty. Journal of Consumer Sciences, 7(1), 34–50. Retrieved on June 2, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.29244/jcs.7.1.34-50
  15. Onditi, E. O., & Wechuli, T. W. (2017). Service quality and student satisfaction in higher education institutions: A review of litera-ture. International journal of scientific and research publications, 7(7), 328-335. Retrieved on June 2, 2024, from https://www.academia.edu/download/100178425/ijsrp-p6737.pdf
  16. Onyema, E. M., Eucheria, N. C., Obafemi, F. A., Sen, S., Atonye, F. G., Sharma, A., & Al-sayed, A. O. (2020). Impact of Corona-virus pandemic on education. Journal of education and practice, 11(13), 108-121. Retrieved on May 1, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/11-13-12.
  17. Pandey, N., de Coninck, H., & Sagar, A. D. (2022). Beyond technology transfer: In-novation cooperation to advance sustain-able development in developing coun-tries. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: En-ergy and Environment, 11(2), e422. Re-trieved on May 1, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.422.
  18. Rieke, T., & Martins, H. (2023). The relation-ship between motives for using a Chatbot and satisfaction with Chatbot characteris-tics: An exploratory study. SHS Web of Conferences, 160, 01007. Retrieved on June 3, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202316001007
  19. Sá, M. J., Santos, A. I., Serpa, S., & Miguel Fer-reira, C. (2021). Digitainability—Digital competences post-covid-19 for a sustain-able society. Sustainability, 13(17), 9564. Retrieved on April 27, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179564
  20. Su, L. H. S., Truong, D.-H., Tran, T.-Y.-L., Ngu-yen, T.-D.-N., Ly, B.-T., & Nguyen, H.-P.-T. (2020). Development of an air chatbot to support admissions and career guidance for universities. IJEMR, 4(2), 11–17. Re-trieved on May 17, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.22662/IJEMR.2020.4.2.011.
  21. Yen-Ting Lin, Y.-T. L., & Yen-Ting Lin, J.-H. Y. (2023). Development of an educational chatbot system for enhancing students’ biology learning performance. Journal of Internet Technology, 24(2), 275–281. Re-trieved on June 3, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.53106/160792642023032402006

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic