Effectiveness of Laboratory Worksheet with Problem-Based Learning Approach for Enriching the Least-Learned Competencies in Life Science

Shaina  D. Benedicto,; Minie  L. Bulay,

Effectiveness of Laboratory Worksheet with Problem-Based Learning Approach for Enriching the Least-Learned Competencies in Life Science

Discipline: Education

Abstract:

The study aimed to address gaps in life science literacy by developing a laboratory worksheet tailored to the least learned competencies of students. A quasi-experimental design with a non-equivalent group approach was used, involving 21 students as the experimental group and 11 as the control group. A standardized test was initially administered to identify the students' least learned competencies, followed by creating a pretest and post-test questionnaire validated by experts. The laboratory worksheet was then developed based on these identified competencies and administered to the experimental group. Results indicated that the worksheet was highly effective, with the experimental group's proficiency level increasing from 30.00 to 69.68, more than double the initial score. Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between the scores of the control and experimental groups, confirming the laboratory worksheet's efficacy in improving student proficiency in life science. The findings imply that targeted instructional materials, such as the developed worksheet, can significantly enhance learning outcomes, suggesting their broader application in educational settings to address specific competency gaps.

References:

A Ali, S. (2019). Problem-based learning: A student-centered approach. English Language Teaching, 12(5), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p73
Allan, S., & Leifer, R. (2023). How high-quality instructional materials can drive teacher growth - K-12 education. Retrieved from https://usprogram.gatesfoundation.org/What-We-Do/K-12-Education
Amos, S., Eghan, M., & Oppong, E. (2022). The impact of instructional materials in teaching and learning of biology in the colleges of education in the Central Region of Ghana. Open Journal of Educational Research, 18(9), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094469
Anderman, E., Sinatra, G., & Gray, D. (2018). The challenges of teaching and learning about science in the twenty-first century: Exploring the abilities and constraints of adolescent learners. Studies in Science Education, 48(1), 89–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2012.747877
Andrade, R., & Zuin, V. (2023). Formative dimensions for green and sustainable chemical education: A qualitative evaluation tool of the formative level of experimental processes. Journal of Chemical Education, 6(1), 2281–2291. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00008
Asrizal, Amran, A., Ananda, A., & Festiyad. (2019). Effects of science student worksheet of motion in daily life theme in adaptive contextual teaching model on academic achievement of students. In The 2018 International Conference on Research and Learning Physics (p. 012093). Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia
Azevedo, J., Hasan, A., Goldemberg, D., Geven, K., & Iqbal, S. (2021). Simulating the potential impacts of COVID-19 school closures on schooling and learning outcomes: A set of global estimates. The World Bank Research Observer, 36(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkab005
Azid, N. (2022). Higher order thinking skills, school-based assessment and students’ mathematics achievement: Understanding teachers’ thoughts. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(1), 290. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i1.22030
Bajana, A. (2019). Attitude of teachers towards mathematics and anxiety of students in mathematics (Master’s Thesis). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12539.95525
Bispo, A., Da Silva, A., Rodriguez, D., & Vasquez, F. (2018). Problem-based learning - A proposal for structuring PBL and its implications for learning among students in an undergraduate management degree program. REGE Revista De Gestão, 25(2), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-03-2018-030
Borja, M., Jeung, R., Yello Horse, A., Gibbon, H. S., Lin, N., Navins, S., & Power, E. (2020, June 17). Anti-Chinese rhetoric tied to racism against Asian Americans: Stop AAPI hate report. Retrieved from https://rb.gy/bn5j22
Cappiali, T. M. (2023). A paradigm shift for a more inclusive, equal, and just academia? Towards a transformative-emancipatory pedagogy. Education Sciences, 13(9), 876. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090876
Clinefelter, D., Aslanian, C., & Magda, A. (2019). Online college students 2019: Comprehensive data on demands and preferences. Louisville, KY: Wiley edu, LLC.
Dagang, A., & de Mesa, C. (2017). Factors influencing choice of a business school in a city of Southern Philippines. Research Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 1–7.
De Jesus, R. (2019). Improving the least mastered competencies in Science 9 using “Pump It Up!” electronic strategic intervention material. In DLSE Research Congress (pp. 1–6). De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines
Delos Santos, J., Lim, R., & Rogayan Jr., D. (2021). Least mastered competencies in biology: Basis for instructional intervention. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 7(3), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v7i3.17106
DiRanna, K., Osmundson, E., Topps, J., Barakos, L., Gearheart, M., Cerwin, K., & Strang, C. (2008). Assessment-centered teaching: A reflective practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Dori, Y., Sasson, I., Kaberman, Z., & Herscovitz, O. (2006). Integrating case-based computerized laboratories into high school chemistry. The Chemical Educator, 9, 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s0089711228
EdReports, & LaVenia, M. (2022). State of the instructional materials market 2021: The availability and use of aligned materials. Florida, USA: EdReports.org.
Etobro, A., & Fabinu, O. (2017). Students’ perceptions of difficult concepts in biology in senior secondary schools in Lagos state. Global Journal of Educational Research, 16(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjedr.v16i2.8
Eviota, M., & Boyles, L. (2022). Least learned competencies in Grade 9 biology: Basis for development of strategic intervention material (SIM). Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 4(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.55057/ajress.2022.4.1.7
Ferlazzo, L. (2021). Eight instructional strategies for promoting critical thinking (Opinion). Retrieved from https://rb.gy/sywj1b
Funa, A., & Prudente, M. (2021). Effectiveness of problem-based learning on secondary students’ achievement in science: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1445a
Heyck-Williams, J. (2017). Teaching, measuring & assessing critical thinking skills. Retrieved from https://rb.gy/3d6mxl
Hofstein, A. (2004). The laboratory in chemistry education: Thirty years of experience with developments, implementation, and research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5, 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1039/B4RP90020K
Holquist, S., Cetz, J., O'Neil, S., Smiley, D., Taylor, L., & Crowder, M. (2020). The "Silent Epidemic" finds its voice: Demystifying how students view engagement in their learning research report. Denver, CO: McREL International.
Ichsan, I. (2019). Designing an innovative assessment of HOTS in the science learning for the 21st century. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 6(2), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v6i2.4114
Idulog, M. V., Gadiano, R., De Toledo, E., Hermosada, M., Casaldon, H., Mariposa, M., Geron, C., Dequito, E., Genanda, J., Malipot, M. A., Pentang, J., & Bautista, R. (2023). Filipino students’ reading abilities: A note on the challenges and potential areas for improvement. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 2(2), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v2i2.128
Kaffenberger, M. (2021). Modelling the long-run learning impact of the Covid-19 learning shock: Actions to (more than) mitigate loss. International Journal of Educational Development, 81, 102326. https://doi.org/10.101