HomeJournal of Interdisciplinary Perspectivesvol. 2 no. 12 (2024)

Enhancing Students' Experience at Sultan Kudarat State University

Jonathan P. Roque | Neljaye M. Manaya

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study addresses the gap in understanding student satisfaction at Sultan Kudarat State University - Palimbang Campus, focusing on the effectiveness of academic programs and support services. The primary objective is to evaluate the factors influencing student satisfaction and identify areas for improvement. Utilizing a descriptive survey research design, data were collected from 78 undergraduate students enrolled in the Bachelor of Science in Agribusiness and Bachelor of Elementary Education programs. The survey assessed various dimensions of satisfaction, including course content, teaching quality, resource availability, and support services. Results indicate a high level of satisfaction regarding course relevance and faculty accessibility; however, significant areas for enhancement were identified, particularly in practical learning opportunities and resource availability. The study concludes that improving these aspects can lead to higher student engagement and academic performance. Additionally, the research highlights the importance of considering community stakeholders, as their perspectives can provide valuable insights into the broader impact of educational offerings. The study is anchored in the student engagement theory, which posits that the quality of educational experiences and support systems influences satisfaction. By integrating feedback from students and community stakeholders, the university can better align its programs with the needs and expectations of its diverse population, ultimately contributing to the institution's success and the holistic development of its students. ?



References:

  1. Bridgstock, R. (2009). The graduate attributes we’ve overlooked: enhancing graduate employability through career management skills. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360802444347
  2. Cerado, E. C., Falsario, M. J. S., Estrellan, J. C., & Paculanan, A. R. M. (2020). Enhancing higher education programs through a graduate survey'. International Journal of Current Research, 12(7), 12680-12692. https://doi.org/10.24941/ijcr.39252.07.2020
  3. Cook, S. (2009). Important events in the development of academic advising in the United States. Nacada Journal, 29(2), 18-40. https://doi.org/10.12930/0271-9517-29.2.18
  4. Gordon, V. N., Habley, W. R., & Grites, T. J. (2011). Academic advising: A comprehensive handbook. John Wiley & Sons. https://shorturl.at/6QTYk
  5. Hake, R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Am. J. Phys., 66 (1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
  6. Kakay, S. (2021). A qualitative analysis of the impact of cultural inertia on studynet/canvas use in teaching and learning at a post-92 university. International Journal of Advanced Research, 9(7), 730-746. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/13175
  7. Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press. https://shorturl.at/0e9tw
  8. Oblinger, D. G. (2006). The next generation of educational engagement. Journal of interactive media in education, 2004(1), 10-10. https://doi.org/10.5334/2004-8-oblinger
  9. Oliveira, T., Alves, H., & Leitão, J. (2024). Co-creation and innovation in higher education institutions: a systematic literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Educational Management, 38(3), 839-872. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-09-2023-0456
  10. Osman, A.R., & Saputra, R.S. (2019). A pragmatic model of student satisfaction: a viewpoint of private higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 27(2), 142-165. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-05-2017-0019
  11. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. Jossey-Bass, An Imprint of Wiley
  12. Sutherland, D., Warwick, P., Anderson, J., & Learmonth, M. (2018). How Do Quality of Teaching, Assessment, and Feedback Drive Undergraduate Course Satisfaction in U.K. Business Schools? A Comparative Analysis With Nonbusiness School Courses Using the U.K. National Student Survey. Journal of Management Education, 42(5), 618-649. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562918787849
  13. Tinto, V. (2012). Completing college: Rethinking institutional action. University of Chicago Press. https://shorturl.at/pqGOT