Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 2 no. 12 (2024)

Power of GeoGebra in Igniting the Interest in Learning Quadratic Functions

Rhio S. Pospos | Brando Piñero

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study investigated the perceived relationship between students’ interest in learning quadratic functions after utilizing GeoGebra and their perceived usefulness. The study used a quasi-experimental design, specifically the one-group pretest-posttest design using a single-stage cluster sampling technique, to identify Grade 9 students' interest levels before and after using GeoGebra software in the school year 2023-2024 at Demetrio L. Alviola National (Memorial) High School. It also used the weighted mean, Wilcoxon test, and Spearman rank correlation coefficient to compare pre- and post-evaluation interest in learning quadratic functions. The results showed that GeoGebra effectively increased students’ interest in quadratic functions, igniting a greater passion for the subject matter. Furthermore, using GeoGebra tools increased students' interest in learning, leading to greater confidence, participation, and motivation to understand quadratic functions. This encompassed tasks such as graphing, solving equations, and applying their knowledge to real-world scenarios, representing a significant shift before and after incorporating geometry into the learning process. Certainly, GeoGebra's engaging and vibrant components help students to relax and stay engaged, enhancing the enjoyment and collaboration aspects of education. The findings also showed that students' substantial progress in three areas—understanding concepts, engaging with teachers, and assessment results—is closely associated with their interest in learning more about quadratic functions. Students more enthusiastic about quadratic functions are more likely to comprehend these topics using GeoGebra.



References:

  1. Acharya, S. (2020). Effectiveness of GeoGebra in teaching geometry (Doctoral dissertation, Department of Mathematics Education). Retrieved from https://elibrary.tucl.edu.np
  2. Alabdulaziz, M. S., Aldossary, S. M., Alyahya, S. A., & Althubiti, H. M. (2021). The effectiveness of the GeoGebra Programme in the development of academic achievement and survival of the learning impact of the mathematics among secondary stage students. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 2685-2713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10371-5
  3. Arnawa, I. M., & Fitriani, N. (2022). Constructing Calculus Concepts through Worksheet Based Problem-Based Learning Assisted by GeoGebra Software. HighTech and Innovation Journal, 3(3), 282-296. https://doi.org/10.28991/HIJ-2022-03-03-04
  4. Awaji, B. M. A. (2021). Investigating the effectiveness of using GeoGebra software on students' mathematical proficiency (Doctoral dissertation). University of Glasgow
  5. Azizah, A. N., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Fitriana, L. (2021, March). The Effectiveness of Software GeoGebra to Improve Visual Representation Ability. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1808, No. 1, p. 012059). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org10.1088/1742-6596/1808/1/012059
  6. Bedada, T., & Machaba, M. F. (2022). The effect of GeoGebra on students’ abilities to study calculus. Education Research International 2022
  7. Bernardo, A. B., Cordel, M. O., Calleja, M. O., Teves, J. M. M., Yap, S. A., & Chua, U. C. (2023). Profiling low-proficiency science students in the Philippines using machine learning. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-12. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-023-01705-y
  8. Birgin, O., & Topuz, F. (2021). Effect of the GeoGebra software-supported collaborative learning environment on seventh grade students’ geometry achievement, retention and attitudes. The Journal of Educational Research, 114(5),474-494. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1983505
  9. Birgin, O., & Uzun Yazıcı, K. (2021). The effect of GeoGebra software–supported mathematics instruction on eighth‐grade students' conceptual understanding and retention. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(4), 925-939. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12532
  10. Conceição, A. C. (2021). Dynamic and interactive tools to support teaching and learning. Mathematical and Computational Applications, 27(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca27010001
  11. Dahal, N., Shrestha, D., & Pant, B. P. (2019). Integration of GeoGebra in teaching and learning geometric transformation. Journal of Mathematics and Statistical Science, 5(12), 323-332. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354776485
  12. Descartin, D. M., Kilag, O. K., Groenewald, E., Abella, J., Cordova Jr, N., & Jumalon, M. L. (2023). Curricular Insights: Exploring the Impact of Philippine K to 12 on PISA 2022 Reading Literacy Achievement. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education, 1(6), 334-342. https://multijournals.org/index.php/excellencia-imje/article/view/190
  13. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary educational psychology, 61, 101859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859
  14. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2023). Expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: Reflections on the legacy of 40+ years of working together. Motivation Science, 9(1), 1. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/mot0000275
  15. Eid, A., & Abdulla, T. J. (2021, November). How effective is GeoGebra Software in improving students learning similarities of geometrical shapes. In 2021 Sustainable Leadership and Academic Excellence International Conference
  16. Engelbrecht, J., Llinares, S., & Borba, M. C. (2020). Transformation of the mathematics classroom with the internet. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52, 825–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01176-4
  17. Fletcher, D. (2018). Global Problem-Based Learning In Math (Doctoral dissertation). University of South Carolina
  18. Handayani, P. K., Arip, A. G., & Nur, S. H. (2022). Implementation of the Student Facilitator and Explaining Model Assisted by Media Game on the Students' Explaining Skills. Journal of Biological Education Indonesia (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 8(3), 296-301. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1372954
  19. Harahap, K. A., Sinaga, B., & Siagian, P. (2021). Development of GeoGebra-Assisted Problem Based Learning (PBL) Learning Tools to Improve Visual Thinking Skills in Mathematical Problem Solving Students of SMA Negeri 1 Samudera. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 4(1), 239-251. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i1.1581
  20. Hayati, Z., & Ulya, K. (2022). Developing students’mathematical understanding using geogebra software. Jurnal ilmiah didaktika: media ilmiah pendidikan dan pengajaran, 22(2), 134-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/jid.v22i2.11451
  21. Hoyles, C. (2018). Transforming the mathematical practices of learners and teachers through digital technology. Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 209-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2018.1484799
  22. Jalandoni, J. F., & Futalan, M. C. (2024). Scaffolding students' difficulties in addition and subtraction of integers through game-based instruction. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(7), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0143
  23. Jones, L. K., & Hite, R. L. (2020). Expectancy Value Theory as an Interpretive Lens to Describe Factors That Influence Computer Science Enrollments and Careers for Korean High School Students. Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 24(2), 86-118. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1261786
  24. Joshi, D. R., & Singh, K. B. (2020). Effect of using GeoGebra on eight grade students’ understanding in learning linear equations. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 12(3), 76-83. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344927076
  25. Juandi, D., Kusumah, Y. S., Tamur, M., Perbowo, K. S., & Wijaya, T. T. (2021). A meta-analysis of Geogebra software decade of assisted mathematics learning: what to learn and where to go?. Heliyon, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06953
  26. Kado, K., & Dukpa, P. (2020). Effectiveness of using GeoGebra on students’ conceptual understanding in differential calculus for grade xi students at gongzim ugyen dorji central school. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 7(9), 71-75. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355144987
  27. Karma, I. G. M., Darma, I. K., & Santiana, I. M. A. (2019). Teaching strategies and technology integration in developing blended learning of applied mathematics subject. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific Research, 5(5), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v5n5.726
  28. Kholid, M. N., Putri, Y. P., Swastika, A., Maharani, S., & Ikram, M. (2022, July). What are the pupils’ challenges in implementing reflective thinking for problem-solving? In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2479, No. 1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0099600
  29. Lopes , Érika M. C. ., Pereira, L. R. ., & Bertone , A. M. A. . (2019). Distance Education in Brazil: An Experience with Mathematical Modeling with GeoGebra Aid . International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 7(9), 224-240. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol7.iss9.1738
  30. Mosese, N., & Ogbonnaya, U. I. (2021). GeoGebra and Students' Learning Achievement in Trigonometric Functions Graphs Representations and Interpretations. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(2), 827- https://doi.org/846.10.18844/cjes.v16i2.5685
  31. Naidoo, J., & Hajaree, S. (2021). Exploring the perceptions of Grade 5 learners about the use of videos and PowerPoint presentations when learning fractions in mathematics. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 11(1), 846. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v11i1.846
  32. Nolen, S. B. (2020). A situative turn in the conversation on motivation theories. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101866
  33. Nurzannah, N., Muliana, M., Herizal, H., Fajriana, F., & Mursalin, M. (2021). The effect of REACT strategy assisted by GeoGebra software on students' mathematical representation ability. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning, 4(2), 90-97. https://doi.org/10.29103/mjml.v4i2.5709
  34. Pari Condori, A., Mendoza Velazco, D. J., & Auccahuallpa Fernández, R. (2020, November). GeoGebra as a technological tool in the process of teaching and learning geometry. In Conference on Information and Communication Technologies of Ecuador (pp. 258-271). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62833-8_20
  35. Rabi, F., Fengqi, M., Aziz, M., Ullah, M. I., & Abduraxmanovna, N. H. (2021). the Impact of the Use of Geogebra on Student’S Mathematical Representation Skills and Attitude. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(12). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i12.4007
  36. Ridha, M. R., & Pramiarsih, E. E. (2020, March). The Use of GeoGebra Software in Learning Geometry Transformation to Improve Students’ Mathematical Understanding Ability. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1477, No. 4, p. 042048). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1477/4/042048
  37. Rojo, M., Gersib, J., Powell, S. R., & Bryant, D. P. (2023). A Meta-Analysis of Mathematics Interventions: Examining the Impacts of Intervention Characteristics. Educational Psychology Review, 36(9), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09843-0
  38. Romantico, J. (2019). Use of information Technology in Teaching Mathematics among Junior High School Teachers of Binulasan integrated School, infanta, Quezon, Schoolyear 2018-2019. Ascendens Asia Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, 3(2K). https://ojs.aaresearchindex.com/index.php/AAJMRA/article/view/7601
  39. Rosenzweig, E. Q., Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. E. (2019). Expectancy-Value Theory and Its Relevance for Student Motivation and Learning. In The Cambridge Handbook of Motivation and Learning (pp. 617–644). chapter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  40. Santia, I., Purwanto, Sutawidjadja, A., Sudirman, & Subanji. (2019). Exploring mathematical representations in solving ill-structured problems: The case of quadratic function. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(3), 365–378. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1229913
  41. Saputra, E., & Fahrizal, E. (2019). The development of mathematics teaching materials through GeoGebra software to improve learning independence. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 2(2), 39-44. https://doi.org/10.29103/mjml.v2i2.1860
  42. Sheikh Qasem, K. W. (2020). The Impact of GeoGebra Software on the Performance of Grade 10-Algebra Students in Graphing Quadratic Functions in Al Ain. ). Curriculum and Instruction Theses, 7.https://scholarworks.uaeu.ac.ae/curriculum_theses/7
  43. Tamam, B., & Dasari, D. (2021, May). The use of GeoGebra software in teaching mathematics. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1882, No. 1, p. 012042). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012042
  44. Tong, D. H., Uyen, B. P., Kieu, H. T. D., & Ngan, L. K. (2021). The effectiveness of using GeoGebra software in mathematics classrooms: A case study of teaching continuous functions in high schools. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences, 48(9). http://jonuns.com/index.php/journal/article/view/742
  45. Trinidad, J. E. (2020). Material resources, school climate, and achievement variations in the Philippines: Insights from PISA 2018. International Journal of Educational Development, 75, 102174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102174
  46. Uwurukundo, M. S., Maniraho, J. F., & Tusiime Rwibasira, M. (2022). Effect of GeoGebra software on secondary school students’ achievement in 3-D geometry. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 5749-5765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10852-1
  47. Uwurukundo, M. S., Maniraho, J. F., & Tusiime, M. (2020). GeoGebra integration and effectiveness in the teaching and learning of mathematics in secondary schools: A review of literature. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 16(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v16i1.1
  48. Uwurukundo, M. S., Maniraho, J. F., Tusiime, M., Ndayambaje, I., & Mutarutinya, V. (2023). GeoGebra software in teaching and learning geometry of 3-dimension to improve students’ performance and attitude of secondary school teachers and students. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 10201–10223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12200-x
  49. Vágová, R., & Kmetová, M. (2019). Geogebra, a tool to improve students’ visual imaging. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 12(2), 225–237. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1238621
  50. Vroom, V., Porter, L., & Lawler, E. (2015). Expectancy theories. In Organizational Behavior 1 (pp. 94-113). Routledge.
  51. Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Expectancy-value theory: Retrospective and prospective. In The decade ahead: Theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement (pp. 35-70). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0749-7423(2010)000016A005
  52. Wigfield, A., & Gladstone, J. R. (2019). What does expectancy-value theory have to say about motivation and achievement in times of change and uncertainty?. In Motivation in education at a time of global change (Vol. 20, pp. 15-32). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0749-742320190000020002
  53. Wijaya, T. T., Ying, Z., Chotimah, S., & Bernard, M. (2020, August). Hawgent dynamic mathematic software as mathematics learning media for teaching quadratic functions. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1592, No. 1, p. 012079). IOP Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1592/1/012079
  54. Wu, F., Fan, W., Arbona, C., & de la Rosa-Pohl, D. (2020). Self-efficacy and subjective task values in relation to choice, effort, persistence, and continuation in engineering: an Expectancy-value theory perspective. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(1), 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1659231
  55. Yatim, S. S. K. M., Saleh, S., Zulnaidi, H., Yew, W. T., & Yatim, S. A. M. (2022). Effects of Brain-Based Teaching Approach Integrated with GeoGebra (B-Geo Module) on Students' Conceptual Understanding. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 327-346. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1331470  https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15119a
  56. Yohannes, A., & Chen, H.-L. (2023). GeoGebra in mathematics education: A systematic review of journal articles published from 2010 to 2020. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5682–5697. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2016861
  57. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
  58. Zulnaidi, H., Oktavika, E., & Hidayat, R. (2020). Effect of use of GeoGebra on achievement of high school mathematics students. Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 51-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09899-y  
  59. Zulu, J., Nachiyunde, K., Nalube, P., & Mwansa, G. (2022). The effect of GeoGebra Classic 6 software on first-year students’ graphing skills of hyperbola functions and confidence in Lusaka District. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 5(2), 406-417. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V5-i2-14

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic