Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 1 (2025)

Perceived Effectiveness of Tutorial Program in Improving Mathematics Academic Performance

Ednalane Mae Mariño | Raymark Anthony P Saluria

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Tutorial programs are one of the many techniques that educational institutions have been experimenting with to improve students' mathematical skills due to realizing the importance of mathematics in the curriculum. This study assessed the influence and effectiveness of tutoring programs on junior high school pupils’ academic performance in Mathematics. The results show that children from various age groups, grade levels, and socioeconomic backgrounds frequently receive individual tutoring, especially in subjects like math and Filipino. Both parents and kids perceive the tutorial program as a highly successful educational intervention that improves learning and gives students more self-assurance when facing mathematical difficulties. Teachers also acknowledge tutorial programs as a beneficial teaching resource that improves students' academic performance. The study demonstrates no substantial correlation between students' academic ability in mathematics and the level of effectiveness of the tutorial program. Although tutoring can provide tailored assistance and promote comprehension, other elements might be more critical in determining academic achievement. Furthermore, a tutorial program is an excellent complement to the educational support structure, offering advantages for various educational backgrounds and demographics.



References:

  1. Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Lee, D. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students. Elementary School Journal, 103(1), 51-73. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/499715  
  2. Bloom, D. E., Canning, D., & Fink, G. (2008). Urbanization and the wealth of nations. Science, 319(5864), 772-775. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1153057  
  3. Calmorin, L., & Calmorin, M. (2007). Research methods and thesis writing. Sampaloc, Manila: Rex Book Store, Inc.
  4. Chan, M., Kwon, J., Nguyen, D., Saunders, K. M., Shah, N., & Smith, K. N. (2020). National trends in federal student loan borrowing by income group and first-generation status. Retrieved from https://www.airweb.org/resources/publications/professional-file/article-148  
  5. Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 237-248. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/00028312019002237  
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
  7. Dynarski, S., Hyman, J., & Schanzenbach, D. W. (2013). Experimental evidence on the effect of childhood investments on postsecondary attainment and degree completion. Journal of policy analysis and management, 32(4), 692-717. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.21715  
  8. Guryan, J., Ludwig, J., Bhatt, M. P., Cook, P. J., Davis, J. M., Dodge, K., ... & Stoddard, G. (2023). Not too late: Improving academic outcomes among adolescents. American Economic Review, 113(3), 738-765. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20210434  
  9. Hattie, J., & Zierer, K. (2017). 10 mindframes for visible learning: Teaching for success. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315206387
  10. Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children’s education?. Review of educational research, 67(1), 3-42. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001003  
  11. Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2008). Estimating teacher impacts on student achievement: An experimental evaluation. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3386/w14607  
  12. Kraft, M. A., Bolves, A. J., & Hurd, N. M. (2023). How informal mentoring by teachers, counselors, and coaches supports students' long-run academic success. Economics of Education Review, 95, 102411. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31257  
  13. Lamont, M., Beljean, S., & Clair, M. (2014). What is missing? Cultural processes and causal pathways to inequality. Socio-Economic Review, 12(3), 573-608. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu011  
  14. Morgan, M. (2018). The importance of mathematics. In R. M. Reilly, G. A. M. Marais, & L. Green (Eds.), Mathematics education in South Africa: The first 21 years (pp. 5-17). HSRC Press.
  15. Morris, E.D. (no date) Sampling from small populations, Sampling from Small Populations. Retrieved from https://uregina.ca/~morrisev/Sociology/Sampling from small populations.htm
  16. Narzoles, D.G., & Palermo, D. G. (2020). Effectiveness of tutorials in improving the academic performance of english language learners. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 2(3), 141-152. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v2i3.380  
  17. Pollard, E. H. C., Martin, A., Takala, H., & Byford, M. (2019). Impact of the student finance system on participation, experience and outcomes of disadvantaged young people. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1406/v5/review1  
  18. Reardon, S. F. (2021). The economic achievement gap in the US, 1960-2020: Reconciling recent empirical findings. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED620595.pdf  
  19. Reay, D. (2005). Doing the dirty work of social class? Mothers' work in support of their children's schooling. The Sociological Review, 53(2_suppl), 104-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.2005.00575.x  
  20. Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417-458. https://doi.org/10.3386/w6691  
  21. Robinson, C. D., Kraft, M. A., Loeb, S., & Schueler, B. E. (2021). Accelerating student learning with high-dosage tutoring. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED613847.pdf  
  22. Seo, E. H. (2018). Private tutoring and academic achievement: Self-study as a mediator. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(5), 823-830. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6689  
  23. Shokirova, M., & Rasulov, I. (2024). Private Tutoring and its effect on students’ learning performance. Journal of Language Development and Linguistics, 3(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.55927/jldl.v3i1.8100  
  24. Slavin, R. E., & Lake, C. (2008). Effective programs in elementary mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of educational research, 78(3), 427-515. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308317473
  25. Steinberg, L., & Icenogle, G. (2019). Using developmental science to distinguish adolescents and adults under the law. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 1(1), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-121318-085105  
  26. Topping, K. J. (1996). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature. Higher Education, 32(3), 321-345. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203761212-10  
  27. VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational psychologist, 46(4), 197-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369  
  28. Woodward, J., Carnine, D., & Gersten, R. (2016). Teaching problem-solving skills. In L. Swanson, K. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 298-315). Guilford Press.
  29. Xixi, L. (2003).A Survey of Tutorial Preparation and Participation. CDTL Brief. Vol. 6, No. 10
  30. Zheng, X., Wang, C., Shen, Z., & Fang, X. (2020). Associations of private tutoring with Chinese students’ academic achievement, emotional well-being, and parent-child relationship. Children and Youth Services Review, 112, 104934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104934    

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic