Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 17 no. 8 (2024)

Exploring the Influence of Situational Ethics on Cheating Behavior of College Students: A Comparative Analysis of Moral and Academic Dilemmas

John Vincent L. Santos

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This research investigates the impact of situational ethics on college students' cheating behavior by conducting a comparative analysis of moral and academic dilemmas. The study aims to identify the underlying factors contributing to cheating behavior within an academic context. Surveys were administered to 253 college students from diverse Holy Cross College, Sta programs. Rosa, NE, Inc., employing a quantitative approach to assess participants' attitudes towards cheating behavior, ethical decision-making tendencies, and their perception of situational factors influencing cheating behavior. The findings of this research yield significant insights. Firstly, academic pressure was found to exert an influence on decision-making in moral dilemmas, albeit with varying effects depending on the specific scenario. Secondly, the presence of a cheating environment demonstrated some impact on decision-making, albeit with variations across different dilemmas. Thirdly, the research establishes that intelligence alone does not determine ethical decision-making, as multiple factors intertwine in shaping individuals' choices. Fourthly, decision-making in moral and academic dilemmas is significantly influenced by diverse moral values. Lastly, a complex relationship is observed between moral dilemmas and cheating behaviors, underscoring the intricate nature of moral decision-making within the academic setting. These findings hold valuable implications for educational institutions, policymakers, and educators. A comprehensive understanding of the situational factors that drive cheating behavior can inform the development of effective strategies aimed at cultivating a culture of academic integrity and fostering ethical decision-making among college students. By considering the nuanced interplay between moral dilemmas, situational ethics, and cheating behavior, targeted interventions can be designed to curb academic dishonesty and promote ethical conduct within educational environments.



References:

  1. Armandi, B. R. (2006). Academic Dishonesty: An Educator's Guide.
  2. Asch, Solomon E. "Opinions and social pressure." Scientific American 193.5 (1955): 31-35.
  3. Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Self‐Regulation, ego depletion, and motivation. Social and personality psychology compass, 1(1), 115-128.
  4. Bolboacă, S. D., Jäntschi, L., Sestraş, A. F., Sestraş, R. E., & Pamfil, D. C. (2011). Pearson-Fisher chi-square statistic revisited. Information, 2(3), 528-545.
  5. Bunce, L., Baird, A., & Jones, S. E. (2017). The student-as-consumer approach in higher education and its effects on academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 1958-1978.
  6. Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 55, 591-621.
  7. Cikara, M., Botvinick, M. M., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). Us versus them: Social identity shapes neural responses to intergroup competition and harm. Psychological science, 22(3), 306-313.
  8. Cizek, G. J. (1999). Cheating on tests: How to do it, detect it, and prevent it. Routledge.
  9. Cointe, N., Bonnet, G., & Boissier, O. (2016, May). Ethical Judgment of Agents' Behaviors in Multi-Agent Systems. In AAMAS (pp. 1106-1114).
  10. Colby, A., Abrahami, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1987). The measurement of moral judgment: Theoretical foundations and research validation. Cambridge University Press.
  11. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. 
  12. Davis, S. F., Drinan, P. F., & Gallant, T. B. (2011). Cheating in school: What we know and what we can do. John Wiley & Sons.
  13. Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., Shinohara, K., & Yasukawa, H. (1999). College cheating in Japan and the United States. Research in Higher education, 40(3), 343-353.
  14. Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons. 
  15. Etienne, H. (2021). The dark side of the ‘Moral Machine’and the fallacy of computational ethical decision-making for autonomous vehicles. Law, Innovation and Technology, 13(1), 85-107. 
  16. Fask, A., Englander, F., & Wang, Z. (2014). Do online exams facilitate cheating? An experiment designed to separate possible cheating from the effect of the online test taking environment. Journal of Academic Ethics, 12, 101-112.
  17. Fletcher, J. F. (1997). Situation ethics: The new morality. Westminster John Knox Press.
  18. Foot, P. (2013). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect. ETHICA, 536. 
  19. Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44(2), 389-400.
  20. Gregar, J. (1994). Research design (qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches). Book published by SAGE Publications, 228.
  21. Hauser, M., Cushman, F., Young, L., Kang‐Xing Jin, R., & Mikhail, J. (2007). A dissociation between moral judgments and justifications. Mind & language, 22(1), 1-21.
  22. Hillebrandt, A., & Barclay, L. J. (2020). How cheating undermines the perceived value of justice in the workplace: The mediating effect of shame. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(10), 1164.
  23. Hogg, M. A., Abrams, D., Otten, S., & Hinkle, S. (2004). The social identity perspective: Intergroup relations, self-conception, and small groups. Small group research, 35(3), 246-276. 
  24. Hosseinkhani, Z., Hassanabadi, H. R., Parsaeian, M., Karimi, M., & Nedjat, S. (2020). Academic stress and adolescents mental health: A multilevel structural equation modeling (MSEM) study in northwest of Iran. Journal of Research in Health Sciences, 20(4), e00496.
  25. Jones, D. L. (2011). Academic dishonesty: Are more students cheating?. Business Communication Quarterly, 74(2), 141-150.
  26. Jordan, J., Mullen, E., & Murnighan, J. K. (2011). Striving for the moral self: The effects of recalling past moral actions on future moral behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(5), 701-713. 
  27. Kant, I. (2005). The moral law: Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals. Psychology Press.
  28. Kerkvliet, J., & Sigmund, C. L. (1999). Can we control cheating in the classroom?. The Journal of Economic Education, 30(4), 331-343.
  29. King, D. L., & Case, C. J. (2014). E-cheating: Incidence and trends among college students. Issues in Information Systems, 15(1).
  30. LaBeff, E. E., Clark, R. E., Haines, V. J., & Diekhoff, G. M. (1990). Situational ethics and college student cheating. Sociological Inquiry, 60(2), 190-198.
  31. Lancaster, T., & Clarke, R. (2016). Contract cheating: The outsourcing of assessed student work. Handbook of academic integrity, 1, 639-654. 
  32. Lang, J. M. (2013). Cheating lessons. Harvard University Press.
  33. Malinowski, C. I., & Smith, C. P. (1985). Moral reasoning and moral conduct: An investigation prompted by Kohlberg's theory. Journal of personality and social psychology, 49(4), 1016. 
  34. Marsden, H., Carroll, M., & Neill, J. T. (2005). Who cheats at university? A self‐report study of dishonest academic behaviours in a sample of Australian university students. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57(1), 1-10.
  35. Maryon, T., Dubre, V., Elliott, K., Escareno, J., Fagan, M. H., Standridge, E., & Lieneck, C. (2022). COVID-19 Academic Integrity Violations and Trends: A Rapid Review. Education Sciences, 12(12), 901. 
  36. McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. The journal of higher education, 64(5), 522-538.
  37. McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3), 294-305.
  38. McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2012). Cheating in college: Why students do it and what educators can do about it. JHU Press. 
  39. McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2012). Cheating in college: Why students do it and what educators can do about it. JHU Press.
  40. McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics &Behavior, 11(3), 219-232.
  41. Murdock, T. B., & Anderman, E. M. (2006). Motivational perspectives on student cheating: Toward an integrated model of academic dishonesty. Educational psychologist, 41(3), 129-145.
  42. Murdock, T. B., Hale, N. M., & Weber, M. J. (2001). Predictors of cheating among early adolescents: Academic and social motivations. Contemporary educational psychology, 26(1), 96-115.
  43. Perez, A. S. B., & Santos, J. V. L. (2022). Alignment of the Holy Cross College STA. Rosa Student’s Program with their Interest and Skills. EDUCATIO: Journal of Education, 7(1), 25-32.
  44. Rettinger, D. A., & Kramer, Y. (2009). Situational and personal causes of student cheating. Research in higher education, 50, 293-313.
  45. Reynolds, S. J., & Ceranic, T. L. (2007). The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: an empirical examination of the moral individual. Journal of applied psychology, 92(6), 1610.
  46. Saana, S. B. B. M., Ablordeppey, E., Mensah, N. J., & Karikari, T. K. (2016). Academic dishonesty in higher education: students’ perceptions and involvement in an African institution. BMC Research Notes, 9.
  47. Santos, J. V. L. (2022). Development of Cheating Dilemma as a Thought Experiment in Assessing the Student’s Ethical Decision Making. Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies, 2(1), 40-56.
  48. Stams, G. J., Brugman, D., Deković, M., Van Rosmalen, L., Van Der Laan, P., & Gibbs, J. C. (2006). The moral judgment of juvenile delinquents: A meta-analysis. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 34, 692-708.
  49. Whitley, B. E. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in higher education, 39(3), 235-274.
  50. Zahra, S. A., Priem, R. L., & Rasheed, A. A. (2005). The antecedents and consequences of top management fraud. Journal of Management, 31(6), 803-828.
  51. Zaki, J., Schirmer, J., & Mitchell, J. P. (2011). Social influence modulates the neural computation of value. Psychological science, 22(7), 894-900

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic