Home⇛Sukisok⇛vol. 3 no. 1 (2023)

A Comparative Study on Group Cohesion and Quality of Decision-Making in the Selected Barangays using Irving Janis' Groupthink Theory

Vida Charm G. Lampadio | Rona D. Alejo | Narsal M. Foronda Jr. | Jessa Marie L. Alvarez

Discipline: Politics

 

Abstract:

This research study examined group cohesion and decision-making quality in three selected barangays in the Philippines specifically San Miguel, San Bonifacio, and Raniag in Burgos, Isabela. Irving Janis' Groupthink Theory served as the theoretical framework for the study, which adopted a qualitative approach with a descriptive phenomenological research design. In-depth interviews and observations were utilized as primary data-gathering methods. The study revealed a strong sense of group cohesion among the barangay officials in the selected areas. However, this high level of cohesion often led to the occurrence of groupthink during the decision-making process, with symptoms such as the illusion of unanimity and self-censorship observed among the officials. Various challenges and factors contributing to groupthink were identified, including conflicting personal preferences, power dynamics, communication barriers, and a lack of diverse perspectives. To address these issues, the study highlighted strategies implemented by the barangays to prevent groupthink and improve decision-making. These strategies included promoting open communication, valuing diverse opinions, comprehensive planning, fairness, and continuous education. The study recommended that barangay officials actively work towards preventing groupthink by encouraging critical evaluation, independent thinking, and constructive dialogue. By embracing strategies such as open communication, involving diverse perspectives, thorough planning, fairness, collaboration with external sources, and continuous education, decision-making practices can be enhanced, and the negative consequences of groupthink can be avoided. Ultimately, this study contributes to the existing knowledge by filling the research gap on group cohesion and groupthink in the specific context of barangays in the Philippines. The findings provide valuable insights for improving decision-making practices and driving positive change in the local governance setting.



References:

  1. Alkosseify, A. (2015, October 29). Groupthink, classical rational decision-making processes, and its deviations. WordPress. https://groupthink-classical-rational-decision-making-processes-and-its-deviations/
  2. Baptist, R. (2015). Measuring predictors of groupthink: Instrument development and validation [Master's thesis, Illinois State University]. ISU ReD: Research and eData. https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/
  3. Birt, J. (2023). What is group cohesiveness? Benefits and building tips. Indeed. https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/group-cohesiveness
  4. Boles, J. (2021). Decision-making under pressure. JB Coco. https://www.curtin.edu.au/students/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Decision-Making-Under-Pressure-18Oct21.pdf
  5. Brennan, A. A., & Enns, J. T. (2015). When two heads are better than one: Interactive versus independent benefits of collaborative cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(4), 1076–1082. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0765-4
  6. Cherry, K. (2022). How to recognize and avoid groupthink. Verywell Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-groupthink-2795213
  7. Crickard, T., Coleman, T., & Eys, M. (2022). Group cohesion: The glue that helps teams stick together. Frontiers. https://kids.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/
  8. Davidson, J. (2019). Getting rid of groupthink. Vast Conference. https://www.conferencecalling.com/stopping-groupthink
  9. Decision Lab. (2023). Groupthink. Decision Lab. https://thedecisionlab.com/reference-guide/
  10. Discover DHL. (2023). What is groupthink and how do you identify it? Discover DHL. https://dhl.com/discover/growing-your-business/avoid-the-groupthink-trap
  11. Dipillo, K. (2019). Diversity, cohesion, and groupthink in higher education: Group characteristics and groupthink symptoms in student groups [Master's thesis, Youngstown State University]. Maag Library, Youngstown State University. https://digital.maag.ysu.edu/xmlui/handle/1989/13974
  12. Guanlao, A. (2021). Conformity and deviance. Scribd. https://www.scribd.com/Conformity
  13. Janis, I. (1972). Victims of groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/31559
  14. Janis, I. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Houghton Mifflin. https://archive.org/details/groupthinkpsycho00jani/
  15. Janis, I. (2007). Groupthink. In R. P. Vecchio (Ed.), Leadership: Understanding the dynamics of power and influence in organizations. BC Campus. https://opentextbc.ca/socialpsycholog
  16. Kenton, W. (2022). What is groupthink? Definition, characteristics, and causes. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/groupthink
  17. Kishore, K. (2022). Decision-making & its importance in problem-solving. Harappa. https://harappa.education/harappa-diaries/what-is-decision-making
  18. Lau, G. (2023). How to avoid groupthink: 5 tips for better collaboration. Dialpad. https://www.dialpad.com/blog/how-to-avoid-groupthink/
  19. Lindley, M., Schwarts, J., & Thompson, M. (2018). When cultural values lead to groupthink, the company loses. PWC Publication. https://pwcpublication/strategy-business/article/
  20. Meadows, D. H., & Wright, D. (2015). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green Publishing. https://wtf.tw/ref/meadows.pdf
  21. Merkhofer, L. (2019). Priority system. Lee Merkhofer Consulting. https://prioritysystem.com
  22. Openstax. (2022). Group decision-making. Openstax. https://openstax.org/books/
  23. Parraza, M. (2018). Groupthink theory. Businesstopia. https://businesstopia.net/groupthink-theory
  24. Reaves, J. (2018). A study of groupthink in project teams [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University]. Walden University and Doctoral Studies Collection. https://waldenu.edu/dissertations
  25. Sanderson, C. (2022). Groupthink and the error of overconfidence. Wondrium Daily. https://wondriumdaily/groupthink-the-error-of-over-confidence/
  26. Schulze, C., & Newell, B. R. (2016). More heads choose better than one: Group decision-making can eliminate probability matching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(3), 907–914. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0949-6
  27. Umana, E., & Okafor, L. (2019). The menace of groupthink on organizational performance. EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review, 7(4), 12-16. https://eprajournals.com/IJES/article/7818
  28. University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. (2015). Front matter. University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. https://open.lib.umn.edu/communication/front-matter/

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic