HomeJournal of Interdisciplinary Perspectivesvol. 3 no. 4 (2025)

Teachers’ Lived Experiences in the Transition to the MATATAG Curriculum: A Phenomenological Inquiry into Adaptation, Challenges, and Growth

Josephine C. Torrefiel | Estelita S. Cagape | Onabelle V. Galan | Venice P. Doydora | Tejie D. Pintac

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study seeks to explore teachers' lived experiences in transitioning to the MATATAG Curriculum amidst inadequate instructional materials, limited time for teaching, the diverse needs of learners, lack of teacher training, unclear implementation guidelines, heightened levels of stress, and the necessity to innovate in teaching. Using a phenomenological approach, in-depth interviews with teachers from selected schools in Candijay, Bohol, were conducted to gain insight into challenges, strategies of adaptation, and professional growth. These have demonstrated that the curriculum was implemented inconsistently because of the vague guidelines and poor training, forcing the teachers to fall back on the old instructional materials and teaching methods. Again, the limitation in instructional time constrained their capacity to deliver quality education. Moreover, teachers found it hard to meet the diverse needs of learners due to insufficient resources and training. The study has underlined the requirement for more explicit curriculum guidelines, government support, enhanced teacher training, mental health interventions, and innovative teaching strategies. These challenges are aligned with UN SDG-4 on Quality Education, which ensures that educators and students experience inclusive, equitable, and effective learning. Strengthening systemic support will enhance the MATATAG Curriculum's sustainability and impact on Philippine education.



References:

  1. Ampo, W. M. (2023). Teacher education graduate’s academic performance in relation to licensure examination for teachers. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(2), 186-195. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7819641
  2. Bautista, A., Cañizares, M. J., & Rosado, L. (2019). The complexity of teachers’ perceptions of curriculum reform: Insights from a longitudinal study. Educational Studies, 45(6), 709-727. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1599826
  3. Bernardo, A. B. I., & Mendoza, R. L. (2020). The K–12 curriculum reform in the Philippines: Challenges for basic education teachers. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 40(2), 242-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1759027
  4. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  5. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2019). Effective teacher professional development. Retrieved from https://rb.gy/l5gbcq
  6. Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/3n5e5s3a
  7. Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a culture of change. John Wiley & Sons.
  8. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
  9. Hargreaves, A., & O’Connor, M. T. (2018). Collaborative professionalism: When teaching together means learning for all. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/57xw2abv
  10. Jerrim, J., & Sims, S. (2020). Teacher workload and well-being: New international evidence from the OECD TALIS study. Retrieved from https://rb.gy/amb8wm
  11. Liu, W. (2018). Challenges in professional development: A study on teacher training for curriculum reform. Educational Research Review, 13, 36–48. https://bit.ly/4hGNvFb
  12. Magno, C. J., & Dela Cruz, A. R. (2021). Challenges in special education: Implications for teacher training and resource allocation in the City Division of Ilagan, Isabela. International Journal of Educational Development, 56(2), 129-145. https://bit.ly/3X3aXEm
  13. Mioduser, D. (2022). Young Students’ Perceptions of Control Systems and Adaptive Robots. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Contemporary Perspectives on Research in Educational Robotics (pp. 123–140). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7719-9_7
  14. Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376-407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609
  15. Roeser, R. W., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., Jha, A., Cullen, M., Wallace, L., Wilensky, R., & Harrison, J. (2013). Mindfulness training and reductions in teacher stress and burnout: Results from two randomized, waitlist-control field trials. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7(3), 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12023
  16. Santos, M. P., & Reyes, L. M. (2023). Evaluating the MATATAG Curriculum: Barriers to inclusive education in rural Philippine schools. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research in Science and Education, 8(1), 380-507. http://bit.ly/410DKKX
  17. Schleicher, A. (2018). World class: How to build a 21st-century school system. OECD Publishing.
  18. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2017). Motivated for teaching? Associations with school goal structure, teacher self-efficacy, job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.006
  19. UNESCO. (2020). Global Education Monitoring Report. UNESCO Publishing.