Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation⇛vol. 3 no. 1 (2025)

Stakeholders' Involvement in School- basedPrograms: A Case Study

Annaliza C. Lopez | Marleonie M. Bauyot

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study explored stakeholders' roles, responsibilities, challenges, and insights in implementing school-based programs at Mapula National High School, Cluster XIII, Division of Davao City. This study employed a qualitative case study approach. The research delved into the participation of parents, teachers, administrators, and community members in various initiatives aimed at educational improvement. As Creswell (2012) noted, the qualitative case study is a research methodology that concentrates on a distinct phenomenon, situation, or context, defined by specific boundaries or parameters. This investigation utilized semi-structured interviews to explore stakeholders' engagement with school-based programs. The following major findings revealed that active collaboration, effective communication, resource allocation, and adaptability were instrumental in sustaining projects focused on students’ development. However, issues such as communication barriers, competing priorities, and limited resources hindered progress, necessitating adaptive strategies. Parents played a pivotal role in bridging community-school relations, while teachers facilitated program delivery amidst resource constraints. The findings underscored the need for stronger partnerships among all stakeholders, fostering a collective commitment to advancing educational opportunities and enriching the school community. It can be concluded that the value of inclusive stakeholder engagement as a means of enhancing school-based programs. By prioritizing collaboration, clear communication, and strategic resource allocation, educational institutions were able to address challenges more effectively and achieve lasting improvements.



References:

  1. Al-Thani, G. (2024). Comparative analysis of stakeholder integration in education policy making: Case studies of Singapore and Finland. College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hamad Bin Khalifa University. Published on June 28, 2024.
  2. Amara and Magalhaes (2010) How interpreters juggle two languages at once. Retrieved from amara.org/en/videos/ OlvJ32xfosP/en/1369974
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  4. Cano, R. L. (2023). Improving school-community relationships (Master's thesis, Northwestern College, Iowa). NWCommons. https://nwcommons.nwciowa.edu/education_masters/
  5. Chambers, J. G., Levin, J. D., Estrada, J., Epstein, D., Mills, N., Wang, A., Jubb, S., Vargo, M., Hollis, J., Brown, B., Ensign, V., & Quealy, C. (2013). Strategic school funding for results: A model to promote equity, autonomy, transparency, and accountability in local public schools. American Institutes for Research. https://schoolfundingforresults.org/2032%20SSFR%20IES%20Final%20ReportR305A100630_FINAL%2 0DRAFT-jc-v3-CLEAN.2013-07-1.pdf
  6. Concepcion, M. L. P. (2022). Extending the Impact of Brigada Eskwela: The Importance of Teachers' Active Participation in Sustaining Educational Initiatives. Journal of Educational Development and Community Engagement, 19(1), 63-76.
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston, MA: Pearson Learning Solutions.
  8. Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Educational research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  10. Crossman, A. (2020). Understanding Purposive Sampling. An Overview of the Methods and Its Applications. https://www.thoughtco.com/purposive-sampling-3026727
  11. Colonia, R. C., Jr., Osias, N. C., & Comon, J. D. (2024). Stakeholders’ participation in the implementation of the Brigada Eskwela Program: Basis for an intervention plan.
  12. De Torres, P. (2021). Stakeholder’s involvement in school-initiated activities of District I secondary schools: Basis for enhanced community partnership program of activities. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 6(2), 481. https://www.ijisrt.com/IJISRT21FEB143
  13. Edunomics Lab. (2021). Desired features of a state funding system. Edunomics Lab. https://edunomicslab.org/wpcontent/uploads/2021/03/State-DescisionTree_FINAL.pdf
  14. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Golestaneh, H., Guerreiro, M., Pinto, P., & Mosaddad, S. H. (2022). On the role of internal stakeholders in place branding. Journal of Place Management and Development, 15(open in a new window) (2(open in a new window)), 202–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-05-2020-0041
  16. Guzman, J. (2022). STAKEHOLDERS’ PARTICIPATION IN SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND SCHOOL PERFORMANCE OF SECONDARY SCHOOLS. International Journal of Arts, Sciences and Education, 3(July Special Issue), 51–66. Retrieved from https://ijase.org/index.php/ijase/article/view/159
  17. International Association of Project Managers. (n.d.). Stakeholder engagement and effective communication | IAPM. Retrieved from https://www.iapm.net/en/blog/thoughts-of-a-pm-stakeholder/
  18. Jaso, Gemma G., and Roleen B. Moleño. 2023. “Extent of Participation of Schools’ Stakeholders to School-Initiated Activities: A Convergent Parallel Approach”. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies 49 (4):278-93. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v49i41207.
  19. Koilakonda, R. R. (2023). Effective communication strategies                 for stakeholder engagement. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13590.36162
  20. Limani, E., Hajdari, L., Limani, B., & Krasniqi, J. (2024). Enhancing stakeholder engagement: Using the communication perspective to identify and enhance stakeholder communication in place management. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2383322
  21. Mariutti, F. G., & Giraldi, J. D. (2020). Country brand equity: The role of image and reputation. Bar. Brazilian Administration Review, 17(3), 1–24.
  22. Muñoz, N., Pozo, E. R., Oyola, S. J., Silva, R. C., Jaramillo, R., & Almeida, B. S. (2022). Service learning and its contribution in the training process of engineering students. In INTED2022 Proceedings (pp. 3636-3644). IATED.
  23. Murugi, M. R., & Mugwe, M. (2023). Stakeholders’ involvement and school leadership for effective implementation of strategic planning. Journal Name, 7(2), 277-286. https://www.jriiejournal.com
  24. Nguyen, T. D., & Nguyen, P. N. (2021). Social resources mobilization for general education development: A case study for secondary schools in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Vietnam Journal of Education, 5(2), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2021.34
  25. Okumu, A. S., & Abuya, I. O. (2023). Monitoring and evaluation, stakeholder engagement, and implementation of servicelearning projects within public secondary schools, Homabay County, Kenya. African Journal of Monitoring and Evaluation, 1(01), 36-47.
  26. Paraiso, J. T. (2022). Stakeholders' Involvement in School-Based Programs of Goso- on Elementary School, Carmen, Agusan del Norte. International Journal of Novel Research in Education and Learning, 9(3), 63-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6660108
  27. Parmar, B.L., et al. (2010) Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Academy of Management Annals, 4, 403-445. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2010.495581
  28. Patton, M. (1999) Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34 (5), 1189–1208.
  29. Sepanik, S., & Brown, K. T., Jr. (2021).         School-Community Partnerships.     Retrieved from https://mdrc.org/sites/default/files/RWJFPartnershipsVoices.pdf
  30. Showkat, N., & Parveen, H. (2017). Non-Probability and Probability Sampling. e-PG Pathshala.
  31. Szemző, H., Mosquera, J., Polyák, L., & Hayes, L. (2022). Flexibility and Adaptation: Creating a Strategy for Resilience. Sustainability, 14(5), 2688. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052688

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic