HomeAugustinianvol. 24 no. 1 (2023)

Teaching Modality: Difficulty and Efficiency levels of Practice Teachers and Their Implication to Efficiency Report

Rosalie P. Espartero | Rhounella Rhane S. Magpantay | Cyril John S. Tubola

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Amid this COVID-19 pandemic, the Philippine education system shifted towards the new normal teaching landscape. In the same way, the preparation of Practice Teachers in their teaching internship also moves with the demands. So, the evaluation tools have to cover the ranging features of the varied teaching modalities and set up sustainable and flexible evaluation criteria. This study described the level of difficulty of the evaluation criteria, efficiency of Practice Teachers, and their implication to the Efficiency Report. Supplementarily, series of procedure were performed to describe the difficulty of the evaluation criteria, the efficiency of Practice Teachers in their internship, and the association between these variables. Results and findings revealed that the evaluation criteria in the Efficiency Report form were entirely “Easy” level (M = 2.13). With these easy-level evaluation criteria, Practice Teachers achieved an “Exceptional” level of efficiency (M = 4.81). Both levels were dependent and they, by the analysis, had a significantly very strong association: (a) Pearson Chi-Square Test X2(12, N = 89) = 35.992, p = 0.000, (b) Linear-by-Linear Association Test X2(1, N = 89) = 7.702, p = 0.006, and (c) Cramer’s V Test V = 0.367, p = 0.000, at a 95%confidence level. With the outcomes of this research and the implication, the Efficiency Report form must be contextualized and redesigned. There should be a constructive alignment of teaching modality with the evaluation tools.



References:

  1. Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2014). Constructive alignment: An outcomes-based approach to teaching anatomy. In L. K. Chan & W. Pawlina (Eds.), Teaching anatomy: A practical guide (pp. 31-38). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08930-0_4
  2. Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher education, 32(3), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871
  3. Bulawat, A. (2021). Practice teaching amidst the pandemic: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Scientific Research in Multidisciplinary Studies7(5), 19-26.
  4. CHEd–DepEd. (2021). Joint CHEd–DepEd memorandum order, s. 2021 (JCDMO No. 1, s. 2021). Philippine Government. https://ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/JCDMO-No.-1-S.-2021.pdf
  5. Cox, J. (2019, June 7). What is student teaching really like?. ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-student-teaching-really-like-2081525
  6. Department of Education. (2012). Policy guidelines on the implementation of grades 1 to 10 of the K to 12 basic education curriculum (BEC) effective school year 2012-2013 (DepEd Order No. 31, s. 2012). Philippine Government. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/DO_s2012_31.pdf
  7. Education Department. (2022). Revised practice teaching manual – CLASE-USA education department.
  8. Leshem, S. & Bar-Hama, R. (2008). Evaluating teaching practice. ELT journal, 62(3), 257-265. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm020
  9. Morgan, A., Milton, E., James, D., Kneen, J., Clement, J., Bryant, A., & Beauchamp, G. (2022). Pandemic-related assessment experiences and innovations: Implications for initial teacher education. https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/148030/1/ITE%20COVID%20report%20for%20Cardiff%20U.%20and%20Academia.pdf
  10. Taskaya, S. (2021). Teacher candidates' evaluation of the emergency remote teaching practices in turkey during covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(4), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.366.5