Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 5 (2025)

AI Integration in Academic Pursuits: A Phenomenological Exploration

Lenny R. Godinez | Angela Gabrielle B Bacang

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study addressed a gap in research regarding graduate students' perceptions and use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in higher education, specifically focusing on English majors. Using Colaizzi's phenomenological approach and purposive sampling technique, the researcher conducted semi-structured interviews with seven participants from a private university in Dumaguete City. The findings revealed that integrating AI into academic tasks significantly enhanced students' educational experiences by improving research efficiency, writing quality, creativity, and access to diverse resources. However, concerns about AI reliability and over-reliance were also highlighted. Six themes emerged that illustrated students' AI utilization: (1) Discernment, which involved assessing AI-generated content; (2) Caution, emphasizing the need for ethical use and vigilance against misinformation; (3) Balance, reflecting efforts to integrate AI support while maintaining scholarly voice; (4) Efficiency, highlighting the increased speed of completing research and writing tasks; (5) Confusion, arising from varied experiences with AI; and (6) Independence, encapsulating the desire to maintain critical thinking despite AI assistance. This study enhanced understanding of the complexities of technology integration in education and offered practical recommendations for educators on ethical AI use. Key contributions included advocating for developing programs and workshops focused on responsible AI use and encouraging independent thought and critical engagement among students. Ultimately, this research aimed to inform teaching practices in a digital learning environment and equip students to navigate the challenges and opportunities presented by technological advancements. It offered valuable insights into how graduate students managed the integration of AI in their academic pursuits, thus contributing to the ongoing discourse on technology in education.



References:

  1. Ahmad, S. F., Rahmat, M. K., Mubarik, M. S., Alam, M. M., & Hyder, S. I. (2021). Artificial intelligence and its role in education. Sustainability, 13(22), 12902. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212902
  2. Ahmed, S., Saif, S., et al. (2022). Motivators and barriers of artificial intelligent (AI) based teaching. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 100(100), 74–89. https://tinyurl.com/ypa542m6
  3. Alam, M. K. (2020). A systematic qualitative case study: Questions, data collection, NVivo analysis, and saturation. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-09-2019-1825
  4. Amante-Nochefranca, G., Orbase-Sandal, O., Alieto, E. O., Laput, I. U., Albani, S. E., Lucas, R. I., & Tanpoco, M. (2024). AI-assisted English language learning and teaching in a developing country: An investigation of ESL student’s beliefs and challenges. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48465-0_37
  5. Asirit, L. B. L., & Hua, J. H. (2023). Converging perspectives: Assessing AI readiness and utilization in Philippine higher education. Polaris Global Journal of Scholarly Research and Trends, 2(3), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.58429/pgjsrt.v2n3a152
  6. Awal, Md. R. & Asaduzzaman. (2024). Curse or blessing? Students’ experience from ChatGPT with an application of Colaizzi’s phenomenological descriptive method of enquiry and content analysis. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 14(6), 1299–1313. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-09-2023-0249
  7. Bantugan, B. S., Li, X., Liu, L., Liu, Y., Wang, X., Yang, M., & Zhang, X. (2024). The adoption of artificial intelligence of selected international Chinese educators enrolled as graduate students in the College of Education of St. Paul University Manila. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, XI(II), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.51244/ijrsi.2024.1102011
  8. Borbajo, M. N. M., Malbas, M. H., & Dacanay, L. R. (2023). Reforming education: The global impact of integrating artificial intelligence in the classroom environment. American Journal of Language, Literacy and Learning in STEM Education, 1(5), 16–27. http://grnjournal.us/index.php/STEM/article/view/356
  9. Burkhard, M. (2022). Student perceptions of AI-powered writing tools: Towards individualized teaching strategies. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/fmh45xnf
  10. Celik, I. (2023). Towards intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468
  11. Chan, C. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3
  12. Darwin, D., Rusdin, D., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Laksmi, E. D., & Marzuki. (2023). Critical thinking in the AI era: An exploration of EFL students’ perceptions, benefits, and limitations. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2290342
  13. Demir, K., & Güraksin, G. E. (2022). Determining middle school students’ perceptions of the concept of artificial intelligence: A metaphor analysis. Participatory Educational Research, 9(2), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.41.9.2
  14. Denzin, N. K. (2009). The elephant in the living room: Or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence. Qualitative Research, 9(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794108098034
  15. Estrellado, C. J., & Miranda, J. C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in the Philippine educational context: Circumspection and future inquiries. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/48er2vzc
  16. Fitria, T. N. (2021). QuillBot as an online tool: Students’ alternative in paraphrasing and rewriting of English writing. English: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 9(1), 183. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v9i1.10233
  17. Gocen, A., & Aydemir, F. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education and schools. Research on Education and Media, 12(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.2478/rem-2020-0003
  18. Gumarang Jr, B. K., Mallannao, R. C., & Gumarang, B. K. (2021). Colaizzi’s methods in descriptive phenomenology: Basis of a Filipino novice researcher. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 2(10), 928–933. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.02.10.10
  19. Hao, K. (2019). China has started a grand experiment in AI education. It could reshape how the world learns. Retrieved from: https://tinyurl.com/5n7j8rrd
  20. Hossain, M. S., et al. (2024). Phenomenological approach in qualitative research: Data collection and saturation. ICRRD Qualitative Index Research Journal, 5(2).  https://doi.org/10.53272/icrrd
  21. Kamila, M. K., & Jasrotia, S. S. (2025). Ethical issues in the development of artificial intelligence: Recognizing the risks. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 41(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-05-2023-0107
  22. Kim, J., Merrill, K., Xu, K., & Sellnow, D. D. (2020). My teacher is a machine: Understanding students’ perceptions of AI teaching assistants in online education. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 36(20), 1902–1911. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1801227
  23. Labadze, L., Grigolia, M., & Machaidze, L. (2023). Role of AI chatbots in education: systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00426-1
  24. Lainjo, B., & Tsmouche, H. (2023). Impact of Artificial Intelligence on higher learning institutions. International Journal of Education, Teaching, and Social Sciences, 3(2), 96–113. https://doi.org/10.47747/ijets.v3i2.1028
  25. Lee, I., Ali, S., Zhang, H., DiPaola, D., & Breazeal, C. (2021). Developing Middle School Students’ AI Literacy. Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432513
  26. Lund, B. D., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S., & Wang, Z. (2023). ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24750
  27. Mageira, K., Pittou, D., Papasalouros, A., Kotis, K., Zangogianni, P., & Daradoumis, A. (2022). Educational AI chatbots for content and language-integrated learning. Applied Sciences, 12(7), 3239. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073239
  28. Mandal, R., Mete, J., & Scholar, R. (2023). Teachers’ and students’ perception towards integration of artificial intelligence in school curriculum: a survey 95 teachers’ and students’ perception towards integration of artificial intelligence in school curriculum: a survey. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/ycsv3uyy
  29. Marable, M. (2011).  Transforming teachers: Restructuring technology professional development in a one-to-one laptop school. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/et69bmkt
  30. Marcelo, E. (2023). Address challenges in AI, technology in education. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/mfc8uekc
  31. Masalkhi, M., Ong, J., Waisberg, E., & Lee, A. G. (2024). Google DeepMind’s Gemini AI versus ChatGPT: a comparative analysis in ophthalmology. Eye, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-02958-w
  32. Melchor, P. J. M., Lomibao, L. S., & Parcutilo, J. O. (2023). Exploring the potential of AI integration in mathematics education for generation alpha — approaches, challenges, and readiness of Philippine tertiary classrooms: a literature review. Journal of Innovations in Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.12691/jitl-3-1-8
  33. Melo, N. (2023). Incorporating Artificial Intelligence Into The Classroom: An Examination Of Benefits, Challenges, And Best Practices. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/puncvhf6
  34. Morrow, R., & Rodriguez, A. (2015). Colaizzi’s descriptive phenomenological method Original Citation. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/3nx48wdn
  35. Muchowe, R. M., & William, A. (2024). Investigation of the Strategies to Regulate the Usage of AI Chatbots in Higher Education: Harmonizing Pedagogical Innovation and Cognitive Skill Development. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4748328
  36. Obenza, B., Salvahan, A., Rios, A. N., Solo, A., Alburo, R. A., & Gabila, R. J. (2024, February 13). University Students’ Perception and Use of ChatGPT: Generative Artificial Intelligence(AI) in Higher Education. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/4bk2dm29
  37. Organization, P. I. T. (2024, February 2). Philippine vocational institutions renew focus on employability by embracing tech, report reveals. Philippine Information Technology Organization. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/3tbfujd8
  38. Pula, B. (2022). Does phenomenology (Still) matter? Three phenomenological traditions and sociological theory. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 35(3), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-021-09404-9
  39. Rong, Q., Lian, Q., & Tang, T. (2022). Research on the influence of AI and VR technology for students’ concentration and creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.767689
  40. Ross, E. (2023). Embracing artificial intelligence in the classroom. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/bdhaz5ny
  41. Serafica, J., & Operiano, D. R. (2024). Exploring research anxiety among bachelor of arts in psychology students in Lipa City: an application of Colaizzi’s descriptive phenomenology. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/4ex99efe
  42. Thomas, B. (2022). The role of purposive sampling technique as a tool for informal choices in a social sciences in research methods. Just Agriculture, 2(5). https://tinyurl.com/mtkeymm2
  43. Wollny, S., Schneider, J., Di Mitri, D., Weidlich, J., Rittberger, M., & Drachsler, H. (2021). Are we there yet? - A systematic literature review on chatbots in education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.654924
  44. Wood, P. (2023). Oxford and Cambridge ban Chatgpt over plagiarism fears but other universities choose to embrace AI bot. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/5fkzn7jz
  45. Wu, R., & Yu, Z. (2023). Do AI chatbots improve students learning outcomes? Evidence from a meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13334

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic