Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 5 (2025)

Navigating Electrochemistry: Challenges and Coping Strategies of Engineering Students

Reden E. Nolasco

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The research examines engineering students' difficulties in electrochemistry and how they manage these challenges. Electrochemistry is a core but challenging subject in engineering education, which tends to be difficult because of its abstractness, mathematical nature, and laboratory component. Even though it is crucial in many engineering contexts, students struggle to comprehend central ideas, apply reaction quotient and electrochemical equations problems, and extend abstract knowledge to laboratory situations. This study endeavors to determine the particular learning difficulties faced by students in engineering and examine the coping strategies they utilize. With a qualitative study design, an FGD was held with 12 students who had finished the Chemistry for Engineers course. Thematic analysis of the data indicated five main challenges: conceptual complexity, mathematical complexity, laboratory constraints, insufficient prior knowledge and resources, and emotional stress due to academic pressures. To manage these issues, students employed various coping mechanisms, including collaborative learning with peer interaction, reliance on web-based learning materials such as YouTube and electronic textbooks, independent study techniques such as working on problems in practice and mnemonics, and motivational strategies aiming towards perseverance. The study concludes that instructional-focused materials, improved laboratory facilities, and systematic academic support systems are required to improve the education of electrochemistry among engineering students. Such evidence has important implications for teachers and curriculum developers based on the imperative for pedagogical improvements targeting scholarly and psychological requirements to drive student learning success.



References:

  1. Akram, M., Surif, J. B., & Ali, M. (2014). Conceptual difficulties of secondary school students in electrochemistry. Asian Social Science, 10(19). https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n19p276
  2. Ayado, D. M., & Berame, J. S. (2022). Effectiveness of supplementary modular learning materials to grade 12 students in science, technology, engineering, mathematics track in stoichiometry. International Journal of Educational Policy Research and Review, 9(4), 112–135. https://doi.org/10.15739/ijeprr.22.013
  3. Bacomo, A. C. C., Daculap, L. P., Ocampo, M. G. O., Paguia, C. D., Pentang, J. T., & Bautista, R. M. (2022). Modular Learning Efficiency:  Learner’s Attitude and Performance Towards Self-Learning Modules. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6511719
  4. Gao, X. (2023). Academic Stress and Academic Burnout in Adolescents: A Moderated Mediating Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1133706
  5. Kelley, E. W. (2021). Lab theory, hlab pedagogy, and review of laboratory learning in chemistry during the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(8), 2496–2517. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00457
  6. Leopold, H., & Smith, A. (2019). Implementing reflective group work activities in a large chemistry lab to support collaborative learning. Education Sciences, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10010007
  7. Maziriri, E. T., Gapa, P., & Chuchu, T. (2020). Student perceptions towards the use of YouTube as an educational tool for learning and tutorials. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1329a
  8. Mirtachew Tihar, A., Reda Woldu, A., & Geremew, A. Y. (2022). High school students’ learning difficulties in electrochemistry: a mini—review. African Journal of Chemical Education, 12(2), 202–205.
  9. Neba, N. P. & Niba, A. T. (2024). The Effects of Academic Related Stress on the Performance Scores of Students of Ordinary Level Chemistry in Bamenda III. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 675–683. https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd64742.pdf
  10. Orozco, M., Boon, M., & Arce, A. S. (2022). Learning electrochemistry through scientific inquiry. conceptual modelling as learning objective and as scaffold. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(1), 180–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2047894
  11. Rodríguez-Velázquez, S. (2013). Development of an electrochemistry teaching sequence using a phenomenographic approach [thesis]. In North Carolina State University, North Carolina State University
  12. Salame, I. I., Etwaroo, N., Khalil, A., & Kolozian, T. (2022). Examining some of students’ challenges and use of algorithmic problem-solving approaches in electrochemical titrations. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15326a
  13. Scott, F. J. (2012). Is Mathematics to Blame? An Investigation into High School Students’ Difficulty in Performing Calculations in Chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(3), 330–336. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2rp00001f
  14. Scott, P. (2023). The science of effective studying: proven techniques backed by research. The Study Journal.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic