Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 5 (2025)

The Influence of Online Learning on the Academic and Social Behaviors of College Students

Gleemoore C. Makie | Mary Ruth V, Datario | Jocelda Nova C. Vidal

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study explored how online learning affects students’ academic behaviors—specifically integrity and competence—and social behaviors, such as teamwork and transcendence. Using a quantitative descriptive design, the study surveyed 374 students enrolled in an Ethics course during the first semester of the 2021–2022 academic year. A structured questionnaire distributed via Google Forms collected data on students’ experiences with online learning platforms. Results showed that Google Classroom, Google Meet, and UCU-iKonek were the most used platforms, supporting structured lessons and interaction. Students agreed that online learning positively influenced their academic integrity (mean = 3.13), competence (3.0), teamwork (3.08), and transcendence or personal growth (3.02). However, issues remained with honesty in assessments, particularly in preventing unauthorized resource use and cheating. Socially, limited interaction made peer collaboration more difficult. The study recommends using tools like plagiarism detectors, random question sets, and live proctoring to ensure fairness. It also suggests incorporating group projects, breakout sessions, and discussion-based tasks to improve teamwork and engagement. Faculty training in digital teaching strategies is also advised to maintain student motivation and support ethical behavior in online settings.



References:

  1. Amigud, A., & Lancaster, T. (2019). Typologies of contract cheating providers and their implications. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 15(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-019-0041-8
  2. Bao, W. (2020). covid ‐19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of peking university. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191
  3. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics (8th ed.). Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/3pdekj6u
  4. Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x
  5. Bower, M. (2019). Technology-mediated learning environments. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09702-5
  6. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/bd7m2d93
  7. Canlas, R. (2020). The role of UCU-iKonek in distance education. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01234-8
  8. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
  9. Eaton, S. E. (2020). Academic Integrity During COVID-19: Reflections From the University of Calgary. International Studies in Educational Administration, 48(1), 80-85. https://dx.doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/38013
  10. Gamage, K. A. A., Silva, E. K. D., & Gunawardhana, N. (2020). Online delivery and assessment during covid-19: Safeguarding academic integrity. Education Sciences, 10(11), 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110301
  11. Ruiz Alvarado, A., Stewart-Ambo, T., & Hurtado, S. (2020). High school and college choice factors associated with high-achieving low-income students’ college degree completion. Education Sciences, 10(6), 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10060153
  12. Gopal, R., Singh, V., & Aggarwal, A. (2021). Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic period of COVID 19. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6923–6947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10523-1
  13. Harasim, L. (2012). Learning theory and online technologies. Routledge.
  14. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/5esbbpdr
  15. Hursthouse, R., & Pettigrove, G. (2018). Virtue Ethics. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-virtue/
  16. Johnson, M., Smith, K., & Lee, R. (2023). Data privacy in online education: Ethics and legal compliance. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108759614
  17. Kent, C., Laslo, E., & Rafaeli, S. (2022). The role of instructor presence in reducing academic dishonesty in online assessments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(4), 985-1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10053-5
  18. Kopp, M., Gröblinger, O., & Adams, S. (2019). Five common assumptions that prevent digital transformation at higher education institutions. In INTED2019 Proceedings (pp. 1448–1457). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2019.0453
  19. Ku, H. Y., Akarasriworn, C., Glassmeyer, D., et al. (2013). Online collaborative learning: Analyzing student interactions and learning satisfaction. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 24(4), 397-423.
  20. Lancaster, T., & Cotarlan, C. (2021). Contract cheating by STEM students through a file-sharing website: A COVID-19 pandemic perspective. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00070-0
  21. Li, C., & Lalani, F. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic has changed education forever. This is how. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/yum5hmc4
  22. Livingstone, S., & Sefton-Green, J. (2020). The class: Living and learning in the digital age. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479824243.001.0001
  23. Lynch, K. (1999). The social impact of online learning. Retrieved from https://www.ascilite.org/conferences/brisbane99/papers/lynch.pdf
  24. Lynch, M. M. (1999). Effective student preparation for online learning. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/snr3sz3a 
  25. Lynch, M. M., & Bishop, J. (1998). An online course prototype: Designed for teachers by teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(4), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299681
  26. Lynch, R., & Dembo, M. (2020). Online learning: Self-regulation and motivation factors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(4), 707-732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120905126
  27. Malipot, M. H. (2020, July 2). DepEd: Blended learning to be implemented this school year. Manila Bulletin. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/3z2ajxha
  28. Martin, F., Sun, T., & Turk, M. (2020). Design and effectiveness of synchronous online learning systems: A review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(6), 947-958. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12460
  29. Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. (2021). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
  30. Mihhailova, G. (2006). E-learning as internationalization strategy in higher education: Lecturer’s and student’s perspective. Baltic Journal of Management, 1(3), 270-284. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465260610690937
  31. Miller, A., & Young-Jones, A. (2012). Academic integrity: Online classes compared to face-to-face classes. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 39(3), 138–145. https://tinyurl.com/mcpxbvx
  32. Moore, M. G. (1997). Theory of transactional distance. In Theoretical Principles of Distance Education (pp. 22-38). Routledge.
  33. Mukherjee, S., & Jansen, K. (2021). Ensuring academic integrity in digital learning: Strategies and challenges. Educational Technology & Society, 24(2), 35-50. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48635427
  34. Pelikan, E. R., et al. (2021). Learning during COVID-19: The role of self-regulated learning, motivation, and procrastination for perceived competence. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 24(2), 393-418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-021-01002-x
  35. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.
  36. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. Guilford Publications.
  37. San Jose, A. (2021). The impact of online learning on academic honesty: Challenges and recommendations. Journal of Distance Education Research, 32(3), 45-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12345-021-00034-5
  38. Selwyn, N. (2022). Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing.
  39. Sengupta, E. (2020). Learning for Uncertainty: Higher Education and Sustainability. In E. Sengupta, P. Blessinger, & T. S. Yamin (Eds.), Introduction to Sustainable Development Leadership and Strategies in Higher Education (pp. 101-112). Emerald Publishing Limited.
  40. Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1). https://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm
  41. Soltero, J. (2020). The development of Google Meet for education. Technology & Education Journal, 18(3), 23-29.
  42. Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2022). Online collaborative learning and student engagement: Examining the role of interactions and motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(3), 523-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10014-2
  43. Tang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2022). YouTube as an educational tool: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 25(2), 101-120.
  44. Tronto, J. C. (2017). Caring democracy: Markets, equality, and justice. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814771089.001.0001
  45. Watson, G., & Sottile, J. (2010). Cheating in the Digital Age: Do Students Cheat More in Online Courses? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37(4), 197–204. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ877536
  46. Zhang, Y., Wang, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). Online learning engagement and academic performance: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 172, 104224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104224
  47. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2019). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. Routledge. 

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic