An Essay on the Bonifacio-Aguinaldo Schism as Manifestation of National Disunity
Joseph Reylan Viray | Kriztine Viray
Discipline: Politics
Abstract:
This essay conducts an analysis of the underlying factors contributing to the ideological and strategic disagreement between Emilio Aguinaldo and Andres Bonifacio during the Philippine Revolution. Employing a multi-dimensional approach, the essay scrutinizes the distinct objectives each leader had for the revolution, highlighting the complexities of their conflicting perspectives. Likewise it evaluates the substantive impact of the Aguinaldo-Bonifacio schism on what was otherwise considered a unified revolutionary movement, thereby presenting implications for the interpretation of historical revolutions.
References:
- Ancheta, C. (1971). One Hundred Revolts Against Spain (Paper read). 5th Conference on Asian History by the International Association of Historians of Asia.
- Constantino, R. (1975). The Philippines: A past revisited. Manila, Philippines.
- DeViana, A. (2014). Si Manong Andres: Stories about Andres Bonifacio De Castro. Historical Bulletin, XLVIII, 12-33.
- Kalaw, M. (1926). The development of Philippine politics (1872-1920). Philippine Political Science Series, Vol. 1. Oriental Commercial Co., Inc.: Manila.
- Karnow, S. (1989). In our image: America’s empire in the Philippines. Random House.
- Kendall, D., Murray, J. L., & Linden, R. (2004). Sociology in our times (3rd ed.). Nelson Education Ltd., 190.
- Mateo, G. (2003). Ethnicity and the creation of national identity. Office of Multicultural Student Services, University of Hawaii. Retrieved October 7, 2007, from www.opmanoa.ssc.hawaii.edu
- Mabini, A. (1969). The Philippine Revolution. (L.M. Guerrero Trans.). National Historical Commission.
- May, G. (2007). Warfare by Pulong: Bonifacio, Aguinaldo, and the Philippine Revolution against Spain. Philippine Studies, 55(4), 449-447.
- McCoy, A. (2001). The colonial origins of Philippine military traditions. In F. Rodao & F. N. Rodriquez (Eds.), The Philippine Revolution of 1896: Ordinary lives in extraordinary times (pp. 83-124). Ateneo de Manila University Press.
- Robles, E. (n.d.). Manuel L. Quezon, Messages of the President, Vol. 2, Part I (pp. 26-27). Cited in E. Robles, The Philippines in the Nineteenth Century. Malaya Books.
- Saulo, A. (1987). The truth about Aguinaldo and other heroes. Phoenix Publishing House: Quezon City.
- Schumacker, J. (1976). The religious character of the revolution in Cavite, 1896-1897. Philippine Studies, 24, 399-416.
- U.S. Senate Document. (1902). As cited in A. Saulo’s The truth about Aguinaldo and other heroes. Viray, J.R.B. (2014). The case of Kapampangan Supremo: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. PUP Monograph Series 2014. Polytechnic University of the Philippines.
- Weber, M. (n.d.). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Retrieved November 20, 2012. http://marxists.org/reference/archive/weber/protestant-ethic/ch05.htm
ISSN 2546-0757 (Online)
ISSN 2546-0757 (Print)