Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 6 (2025)

Student Engagement in Blended Mathematics Learning: The Role of Perceived Teaching Performance and Learning Attitudes

Leonardo S. Rulida

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The engagement of college students in mathematics presents significant challenges; nevertheless, it is crucial for effective teaching and learning in higher education, particularly in blended learning environments. This study examined the combined effect of college instructors' perceived teaching performance and students' attitudes in learning on the mathematical engagement of Bachelor of Secondary Education (BSED) mathematics students. Data from 120 students were analyzed using a quantitative, non- experimental design with a predictive correlation approach. The stratified analysis showed strong correlations between the perceived teaching performance of college instructors, students' attitudes in learning, and the student's mathematics engagement. The regression analysis further demonstrated how these factors collectively influence students' engagement in mathematics. In light of these findings, educators and institutions should focus on enhancing instructional quality, fostering positive student attitudes, and creating engaging learning environments to support meaningful mathematics engagement and improved outcomes. Prioritizing faculty development and implementing targeted interventions can strengthen teaching effectiveness and student mindset—critical for sustained engagement and academic success in blended learning settings. These efforts can lead to higher performance, better learning experiences, and long-term student success.



References:

  1. Alammary, A. S. (2024). Optimizing components selection in blended learning: Toward sustainable students engagement and success. Sustainability, 16(12), 4923. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16124923
  2. Balentyne, P., & Varga, M. A. (2017). Attitudes and achievement in a self-paced blended Mathematics course. Journal of Online Learning Research, 3(1), 55-72. https://tinyurl.com/mx92yx98
  3. Bhandari, K. (2021). Social sanctions of leisure and tourism constraints in Nepal. Tourist Studies, 21(2), 300 316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468797620955248
  4. Carcueva, R. E. (2024). Attitude in learning as a mediator for engagement and academic performance in Mathematics. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(6), 188-196. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0097
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2021). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications.
  6. Croft, T., & Grove, M. (2015). Progression within Mathematics degree programmes.
  7. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
  8. De Bruijn-Smolders, M., & Prinsen, F. R. (2024). Effective student engagement with blended learning: A systematic review. Heliyon, 10(23), e39439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39439
  9. Durksen, T. L., Way, J., Bobis, J., Anderson, J., Skilling, K., & Martin, A. J. (2017). Motivation and engagement in Mathematics: A qualitative framework for teacher-student interactions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(2), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0199-1
  10. Everingham, Y. L., Gyuris, E., & Connolly, S. R. (2017). Enhancing student engagement to positively impact Mathematics anxiety, confidence and achievement for interdisciplinary Science subjects. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(8), 1153–1165. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1305130
  11. Flores, L., Tamban, S. B., Lacuarin, V. E., Bando, N. M., & Cortezano, G. P. (2021). Students’ engagement and their performances in Mathematics. Paripex Indian Journal of Research, 164–167. https://doi.org/10.36106/paripex/7211471
  12. Gopal, K., Salim, N. R., & Ayub, A. F. M. (2018). Influence of self-efficacy and attitudes towards Statistics on undergraduates’ Statistics engagement in a Malaysian public university. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1132, 012042. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1132/1/012042
  13. Joshi, D. R., Adhikari, K. P., Khanal, B., Khadka, J., & Belbase, S. (2022). Behavioral, cognitive, emotional and social engagement in mathematics learning during COVID-19 pandemic. PLOS ONE, 17(11), e0278052. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278052
  14. Kasimu, O., & Imoro, M. (2017). Students’ attitudes towards Mathematics: The case of private and public junior high schools in the east Mamprusi district, Ghana. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 7(5), 38-43. https://tinyurl.com/2ytp3j62
  15. Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(5), 805-820. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032583
  16. Lijie, Z., Zongzhao, M., & Ying, Z. (2020). The influence of Mathematics attitude on academic achievement: Intermediary role of Mathematics learning engagement. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 460-467. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v4i2.253
  17. Llorente, H. M. C., & Tado, P. P. (2024). The mediating effect of problem-based learning on the relationship between technology integration and student engagement in Mathematics. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 50(4), 54-69. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i41310
  18. Manatad, M. J., & Baluyos, G. (2023). Students’ satisfaction and attitudes toward Mathematics in blended learning in relation to performance in Mathematics. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i06.9367
  19. Mazana, M. Y., Montero, C. S., & Casmir, R. O. (2018). Investigating students’ attitude towards learning mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/3997
  20. McMullen, J., Bui, P., Brezovszky, B., Lehtinen, E., & Hannula-Sormunen, M. (2023). Mathematical game performance as an indicator of deliberate practice. International Journal of Serious Games, 10(4), 113-130. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v10i4.634
  21. Nayir, K. F. (2015). The relationship between students’ engagement level and their attitudes toward school. The Anthropologist, 20(1-2), 50-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2015.11891723
  22. Peteros, E. D., Benemerito, G. N., Peconcillo Jr, L. B., de Vera, J. V., & Alcantara, G. A. (2022). Investigating the attitudes and performance of retained students in Mathematics: A case of Cebu, Philippines. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(3), 8692-8704.  https://tinyurl.com/2b9ypebk
  23. Poquita, J. K. C. (2023). Self-efficacy and motivation as predictors to Mathematics performance in online learning.  International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8220992
  24. Shi, Y., Peng, F., & Sun, F. (2022). A blended learning model based on smart learning environment to improve college students’ information literacy. IEEE Access, 10, 89485-89498. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3201105
  25. Skilling, K., Bobis, J., & Martin, A. J. (2021). The “ins and outs” of student engagement in Mathematics: Shifts in engagement factors among high and low achievers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33(3), 469-493.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00313-2
  26. Steele, J., Holbeck, R., & Mandernach, J. (2019). Defining effective online pedagogy. Journal of Instructional Research, 8(2), 5-8.  https://doi.org/10.9743/jir.2019.8.2.1
  27. Stronge, J. H. (2012). Teacher effectiveness performance evaluation system. Stronge & Associates. https://tinyurl.com/4stf6ab8 
  28. Stronge, J. H. (2018). Qualities of effective teachers (3rd ed.). ASCD. https://tinyurl.com/mrxt8jwn
  29. Torrejos, R. L. (2024). College students’ engagement in Mathematics in the modern world: The influential role of perceived teaching performance of instructors and critical thinking skills in a blended learning environment. European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning, 2(3), 74-89. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2024.2(3).07
  30. Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in STEM: Revisiting the role of social and academic engagement. Educational Researcher, 46(5), 223-234. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17712639
  31. Wang, M. T., Hofkens, T., & Ye, F. (2020). Classroom quality and adolescent student engagement and performance in Mathematics: A multi-method and multi-informant approach. Journal of youth and adolescence, 49, 1987-2002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01195-0
  32. Xia, Q., Yin, H., Hu, R., Li, X., & Shang, J. (2022). Motivation, engagement, and Mathematics achievement: An exploratory study among Chinese primary students. SAGE Open, 12(4), 21582440221134609. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244022113460

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic