Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 6 (2025)

Integrating Design Thinking in Teaching High School Physics

Markpoalo Cañada | Kenny James Cubero | Queennie Del Agua | Rizza Nikka Gerona | Dominic Libres | Resel Ligue | Jonathan Mauring | Hans Adam Padilla | John Paul Quiña | Rochin Ramos | Ofelia Aljade E. Ramos

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study examined the implementation of Design Thinking (DT) in teaching high school physics through a comprehensive two-day seminar workshop. A mixed methods approach was employed to assess its effectiveness, combining quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis. The study involved 21 pre-service teachers (PSTs) majoring in General Science from a state university in Cebu City, Cebu. The DT Framework, which comprised the following phases: Empathy, Define, Ideate, Prototype, and Test, guided the PSTs in demonstrating their teaching strategies, with the researchers evaluating their performance at each stage. Findings indicate that the Empathy phase was strengthened by effective pre-interviews, role assignments, resource availability, and structured organization. In the Define phase, PSTs successfully facilitated problem identification and encountered difficulties in guiding learners to translate questions into actionable insights. The Ideate phase encouraged creativity and collaboration, yet PSTs struggled to clarify the distinction between originality and novelty. During the Prototype phase, they promoted adaptability and resourcefulness but lacked a clear timeline for task completion. Finally, in the Test phase, while PSTs emphasized iterative improvement, they did not provide a rubric for design assessment or a structured approach to gathering end-user feedback. Overall, PSTs expressed high satisfaction with the workshop, praising the topic's relevance, the presenters' expertise, and the engaging activities. Despite these successes, recommendations include refining feedback mechanisms and incorporating a broader range of activities to enhance future workshops. This study highlights the potential of DT in enriching physics education and focuses on areas for further refinement in teacher training programs.



References:

  1. Andrew, M., Ford, P. R., McRobert, A., Whitehead, O., Foster, N. C., Miller, M. T., & Hayes, S. J. (2024). Using a co-produced educational workshop to change the focus of verbal instructions delivered by professional youth soccer coaches: A case study. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 29(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2024.2319056
  2. Cassim, F. (2013). Hands on, hearts on, minds on: Design thinking within an education context. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 32(2), 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2013.01752.x
  3. Deepa, P. (2020). A study on the concepts of design thinking. International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 4(12), 269–272. https://doi.org/10.33564/IJEAST.2020.v04i12.042
  4. Diefenthaler, A., Moorhead, L., Speicher, S., Bear, C., & Cerminaro, D. (2017). Thinking and acting like a designer: How design thinking supports innovation in k–12 education. WISE & IDEO, 6(3), 2018. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20662.14404
  5. Hennessey, E., & Mueller, J. (2020). Teaching and learning design thinking (DT). Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l’éducation, 43(2), 498–521. https://journals.sfu.ca/cje/index.php/cje-rce/article/view/4192
  6. Lambert, R., Imm, K., Schuck, R., Choi, S., & McNiff, A. (2021). UDL is the what, design thinking is the how: Designing for differentiation in Mathematics. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 23(3), 54–77. https://mted.merga.net.au/index.php/mted/article/view/666
  7. Lee, D. (2018). Design thinking in the classroom: Easy-to-use teaching tools to foster creativity, encourage innovation and unleash potential in every student. Simon & Schuster.
  8. Malaluan, N. E., & Landicho, J. N. (2022). Design thinking approach in teaching Physics. Zenodo, 67(1). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5873526
  9. Melles, G., Anderson, N., Barrett, T., & Thompson-Whiteside, S. (2015). Problem finding through design thinking in education. In P. Blessinger & J. M. Carfora (Eds.), Inquiry-based Learning for Multidisciplinary Programs: A Conceptual and Practical Resource for Educators (pp. 191–209). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120150000003027
  10. Noel, L., & Liu, T. L. (2017). Using design thinking to create a new education paradigm for elementary level children for higher student engagement and success. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 22(1), 1–12. https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/DesignTechnologyEducation/article/view/1566
  11. Painter, D. (2018). Using design thinking in Mathematics for middle school students: A multiple case study of teacher perspectives (Doctoral Dissertation). Concordia University–Portland https://digitalcommons.csp.edu/cup_commons_grad_edd/192/
  12. Scheer, A., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2012). Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3), 8–19. https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/DATE/article/view/1679
  13. Simeon, M. I., & Yakob, N. (2022). Exploring the effectiveness of a design-thinking instructional module in STEM context for optimal learning of difficult Physics concepts. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6565742
  14. Smith, R. C., Iversen, O. S., & Hjorth, M. (2015). Design thinking for digital fabrication in education. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 5(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2015.10.002
  15. Tariq, M., Boulet, J., Motiwala, A., Saeed, S., & Zehra, T. (2019). Evaluating the impact of faculty development workshops on implementation of structured verbal feedback. Future Healthcare Journal, 6(1), s166. https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.6-1-s166
  16. Thoring, K., Luippold, C., & Mueller, R. M. (2014). The impact of cultural differences in design thinking education. In Proceedings of DRS 2014 International Conference (pp. 16–19). https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2014.200
  17. Westover, J. (2025). Preparing to present to experts: Overcoming imposter syndrome and connecting with highly knowledgeable audiences. Human Capital Leadership Review, 18(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.70175/hclreview.2020.18.3.1

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic