Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 6 (2025)

Elementary Teachers’ Experiences with Challenges in Teaching Science

Helen G. Garcia | Angela Gabrielle B Bacang | Erlinda N. Calumpang

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Science lessons in elementary schools are often hard to teach because classroom realities do not always match what the curriculum expects. Although science is essential for helping young students think critically and ask questions, there is little research that looks closely at what teachers experience when teaching it. This study aimed to address that gap by exploring how elementary teachers handle science instruction in their daily practice. Using Colaizzi's method and purposive sampling, the researcher interviewed six teachers from public schools in a district in Negros Oriental. The results showed that teachers faced many challenges. These included making complex science ideas easier to understand, meeting the needs of different learners, and working with limited teaching materials. Still, the study found that professional development helped teachers feel more confident and improved their teaching methods. Six emergent themes described their experiences: (1) Chained Potential showed the lack of materials; (2) The Rift of Comprehension explained how hard it was to make science clear to students; (3) Blindfolded Mentors revealed the lack of guidance and support; (4) The Alchemy of Teaching highlighted the creative ways teachers kept students engaged; (5) The Evolving Educator showed how teachers learned to adjust their methods; and (6) Beyond the Curriculum emphasized learning through real-life experiences. This study helped explain the difficulties teachers face in teaching science. It also recommended specific actions, such as giving teachers training that matches their real needs, providing enough teaching materials, and encouraging learning through hands-on activities. These measures can help enhance the way science is taught in elementary schools.



References:

  1. Alam, M. K. (2020). A systematic qualitative case study: Questions, data collection, NVivo analysis and saturation. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-09-2019-1825
  2. Antipolo, A. M. R., & Rogayan, D. V. J. (2021). Filipino prospective teachers’ experiences in teaching in K12 Science curriculum: A cross-sectional research. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v7i1.15468
  3. Awal, R., & Asaduzzaman, N. (2024). Curse or blessing? Students’ experience from ChatGPT with an application of Colaizzi’s phenomenological descriptive method of enquiry and content analysis. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 14(6), 1299–1313. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-09-2023-0249
  4. Boateng, S., & Tatira, B. (2023). Voices from the field: Pre-service teachers’ first time experiences of teaching Physical Sciences during school-based experience. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 22(6), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.6.4
  5. Canuto, P. P. (2024). Pre-service teachers’ experiences in developing and using Science comics as educational materials for elementary Science education. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences (PJLSS), 22(2). https://doi.org/10.57239/pjlss-2024-22.2.00542
  6. Cervantes, F. M. (2024). House leader to DepEd: Review time allotment per subject. Philippine News Agency. Retrieved from: https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1230617
  7. Chitac, I. M. (2022). The rationale for saturation in qualitative research: When practice informs theory. Cross-Cultural Management Journal, 14(1), 29–35. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1060257
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Tashakkori, A. (2007). Editorial: Differing perspectives on mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(4), 303–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807306132
  9. Davidson, S. G., Jaber, L. Z., & Southerland, S. A. (2020). Emotions in the doing of science: Exploring epistemic affect in elementary teachers’ Science research experiences. Science Education, 104(6), 1008–1040. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21596
  10. Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2023). Engagement in high‐leverage Science teaching practices among novice elementary teachers. Science Education, 107(2), 291–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21766
  11. De Los Reyes, R. A., & Bagona, E. R. (2022). Translanguaging in teaching and learning Science in selected multilingual elementary classrooms in the Philippines. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2022.2070848
  12. Depone Bajet, A. H., & J Yacap, M. (2024). Technological, pedagogical and content knowledge of secondary Science teachers in Santa Maria, Ilocos Sur. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 4(3), 585–597. https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049X.2024.4.3.2826
  13. Drummond, J. J. (2022). Historical dictionary of Husserl’s philosophy. Rowman & Littlefield. Retrieved from: https://tinyurl.com/5b9sv7fk
  14. El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students’ engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4
  15. Garcia, J., Uluan, A. Y., Barat, I. J., Lubay, J. N., Macagba, I., & Mahinay, H. (2022). Lived experiences of Science major students in the absence of laboratory activities. American Journal of Education and Technology, 1(2), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v1i2.513
  16. Gumarang Jr., B. K., Mallannao, R. C., & Gumarang, B. K. (2021). Colaizzi’s methods in descriptive phenomenology: Basis of a Filipino novice researcher. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 2(10), 928–933. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.02.10.10
  17. Hadji Abas, H. T., & Marasigan, A. P. (2020). Readiness of Science laboratory facilities of the public junior high school in Lanao Del Sur, Philippines. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2(2). https://tinyurl.com/4vbby29s
  18. Hassan, M. A., Habiba, U., Majeed, F., & Shoaib, M. (2019). Adaptive gamification in e-learning based on students’ learning styles. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1588745
  19. Hossain, S., Alam, K., & Ali, S. (2024). Phenomenological approach in the qualitative study: Data collection and saturation. ICRRD Quality Index Research Journal, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.53272/icrrd.v5i2.4
  20. Jannah, M., Prasojo, L. D., & Jerusalem, M. A. (2020). Elementary school teachers’ perceptions of digital technology based learning in the 21st century: Promoting digital technology as the proponent learning tools. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v7i1.6088
  21. Macias, C., Shin, M., & Bennett, L. H. (2022). “They were teaching me! ”: Reimagining collaborative inquiry with elementary students in Science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 33(5), 466–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1963392
  22. Maeng, J. L., Whitworth, B. A., Bell, R. L., & Sterling, D. R. (2020). The effect of professional development on elementary Science teachers’ understanding, confidence, and classroom implementation of reform‐based science instruction. Science Education, 104(2), 326–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21562
  23. Marable, M. (2011).  Transforming teachers: Restructuring technology professional development in a one-to-one laptop school (Doctoral dissertation). Union University School of Education. https://tinyurl.com/2n222anr
  24. McLaren, P. (2023). Critical pedagogy: A look at the major concepts. The Critical Pedagogy Reader, 75–97. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003286080-6
  25. Means, B., & Neisler, J. (2021). Teaching and learning in the time of COVID: The student perspective. Online Learning, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2496
  26. Menon, D. (2020). Influence of the sources of Science teaching self-efficacy in preservice elementary teachers’ identity development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560x.2020.1718863
  27. Morrow, R., & Rodriguez, A. (2015). Colaizzi’s descriptive phenomenological method. The Psychologist, 28(8), 643-644. https://tinyurl.com/3nx48wdn
  28. Murphy, C., Smith, G., Mallon, B., & Redman, E. (2020). Teaching about sustainability through inquiry-based Science in Irish primary classrooms: The impact of a professional development programme on teacher self-efficacy, competence and pedagogy. Environmental Education Research, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1776843
  29. Peniero, T. F., & Toshihiko, M. (2020). Science Teaching and Learning in Japan and the Philippines: A Comparative Study. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1237–1245. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080414
  30. Picardal, M. T., & Sanchez, J. M. P. (2022). Effectiveness of contextualization in Science instruction to enhance Science literacy in the Philippines: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(1), 140–156. https://tinyurl.com/y9wah8wx
  31. Rahman Talukder, M., Green, C., & Rashid, M. (2021). Primary science teaching in Bangladesh: A critical analysis of the role of the DPEd program to improve the quality of learning in science teaching. Heliyon, 7(2), e06050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06050
  32. Rochette, E. (2022). Understanding the complexity of Science teachers’ lived experience as they navigate two out-of-field areas: Implications and possibilities. In L. Hobbs & R. Porsch (Eds.), Out-of-Field Teaching Across Teaching Disciplines and Contexts (pp. 99–116). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9328-1_5
  33. Safitri, R., Hadi, S., & Widiasih, W. (2023). Effect of the problem based learning model on the students motivation and learning outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 7310–7316. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.4772
  34. Serafica, J., & Operiano, D. R. (2024). Exploring research anxiety among Bachelor of Arts in Psychology students in lipa city: An application of Colaizzi’s descriptive phenomenology (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4782198). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4782198
  35. Suchyadi, Y., Sundari, F. S., Sutisna, E., Sunardi, O., Budiana, S., Sukmanasa, E., & Windiyani, T. (2020). Improving the ability of elementary school teachers through the development of competency based assessment instruments in teacher working group, North Bogor City. Journal of Community Engagement, 2(1), 01–05. https://doi.org/10.33751/jce.v2i01.2742
  36. Tirol, S. L. (2022). Spiral progression approach in the k to 12 Science curriculum: A literature review. International Journal of Education (IJE), 10(4), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.5121/ije.2022.10403
  37. Thomas, Baiju. (2022). The role of purposive sampling technique as a tool for informal choices in a Social Sciences in research methods. Just Agriculture Multidisciplinary e-Newsletter, 2(5). https://tinyurl.com/n4ke4fsu
  38. Utami, I. W. P., Wijayaningputri, A. R., & Fazlyn, N. H. (2024). Implementing of Science literacy guidelines for primary school teacher students. Research and Development in Education (RaDEn), 4(2), 1336–1346. https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v4i2.35892
  39. Walag, A. M., Fajardo, M. T., Guimary, F., & Bacarrisas, P. (2020). Science teachers’ self-efficacy in teaching different k to 12 Science subjects: The case of Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines. Science International, 32(5), 587–592. https://tinyurl.com/5etzejmy

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic