Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 6 (2025)

Factors Affecting the Performance of Students in the National Achievement Test

Rhoda G. Reyno | Rodel B. Guzman

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Achievement tests are essential in assessing educational outcomes and student performance in various subjects. Previous literature has revealed that demographic and administrative factors often affect their results. This study aims to determine the influence of socio-demographic characteristics, teaching effectiveness, and management practices on National Achievement Test (NAT) outcomes among Grade 10 students in the Schools Division of Isabela to provide a basis for an enhancement program. Quantitative research under descriptive-correlational research design was used to collect data from 12 schools and analyze their performance in English, Filipino, Mathematics, and Araling Panlipunan. Results revealed that disparities in performance across subjects, with students struggling the most in Mathematics (M=37.74, low proficient) and critical thinking components. Additionally, socio-demographic factors such as parental education (τb = 0.099, p = .015), economic status (τb = 0.127, p=.001), and school size (τb = -0.126, p =.002) significantly impacted test outcomes, highlighting the need for targeted support. Teaching effectiveness, specifically preparation for instruction and management practices, was also a vital determinant of performance. These findings highlighted the necessity of systemic reforms that center on equitable resource allocation, consistent professional development, and leadership development in schools. This paper suggests that to improve the NAT performance, there is a need for a change of paradigm in the curricula towards a more responsive and evidence-based policy making.



References:

  1. Abramczyk, A., & Jurkowski, S. (2020). Cooperative learning as an evidence-based teaching strategy: What teachers know, believe, and how they use it. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(3), 296-308. https://doi.org./10.1080/02607476.2020.1733402
  2. Bañales, J., Marchand, A. D., Skinner, O. D., Anyiwo, N., Rowley, S. J., & Kurtz‐Costes, B. (2020). Black adolescents’ critical reflection development: Parents’ racial socialization and attributions about race achievement gaps. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 30, 403-417. https://doi.org./10.1111/jora.12485
  3. Barker Scott, B. A., & Manning, M. R. (2024). Designing the collaborative organization: A framework for how collaborative work, relationships, and behaviors generate collaborative capacity. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 60(1), 149–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863221106245
  4. Behiga, R. (2022). Issues with National Achievement Test (NAT) in the Philippines. ResearchGate. https://tinyurl.com/msydfnhe
  5. Bellibaş, M. Ş., Gümüş, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). Does school leadership matter for teachers’ classroom practice? The influence of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on instructional quality. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(3), 387-412.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1858119
  6. Blömeke, S., Olsen, R.V., & Suhl, U. (2016). Relation of student achievement to the quality of their teachers and instructional quality. In: Nilsen, T., Gustafsson, JE. (eds) Teacher Quality, Instructional Quality and Student Outcomes. IEA Research for Education, Vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41252-8_2
  7. Briones, S. K., Dagamac, R. J., David, J., & Landerio, C. A. (2021). Factors affecting the students’ scholastic performance: A survey study. Indonesian Journal of Education Research and Technology, 2(2), 97-102. https://doi.org./10.17509/ijert.v2i2.41394/
  8. Broer, M., Bai, Y., & Fonseca, F. (2019). Socioeconomic inequality and educational outcomes: An introduction. In: Socioeconomic Ineqsuality and Educational Outcomes. IEA Research for Education, Vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11991-1_1/
  9. Chen, Y. C. (2024). Effects of technology-enhanced language learning on reducing EFL learners’ public speaking anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(4), 789-813. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2055083/
  10. Davis-Kean, P. E., Tighe, L. A., & Waters, N. E. (2021). The role of parent educational attainment in parenting and children’s development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(2), 186-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721421993116/
  11. Dhanpat, K. (2022). The education district’s role in developing principals’ instructional leadership in schools (Doctoral dissertation). University of Johannesburg.
  12. Department of Education. (2016). DO 55, S. 2016 – Policy Guidelines on the National Assessment of Student Learning for the K To 12 Basic Education Program. Retrieved from:  https://tinyurl.com/3sj2w56t
  13. Fischer, J. P., & Thierry, X. (2022). Boys’ math performance, compared to girls’, jumps at age 6 (in the ELFE’s data at least). British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 40(4), 504-519.  https://doi.org./10.1111/bjdp.12423/
  14. Guryan, J., Ludwig, J., Bhatt, M. P., Cook, P. J., Davis, J. M. V., Dodge, K., Farkas, G., Fryer Jr., R. G., Mayer, S., Pollack, H., Steinberg, L., & Stoddard, G. (2023). Not too late: Improving academic outcomes among adolescents. American Economic Review, 113(3), 738–765. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20210434
  15. Idris, M., Hussain, S., & Ahmad, N. (2020). Relationship between parents’ education and their children’s academic achievement. Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 7(2), 82-92. https://doi.org/10.46662/jass-vol7-iss2-2020(82-92)/
  16. Jackson, R. M., & Andala, H. O. (2022). School management strategies and students’ academic performance in twelve years basic education in Rwanda. Journal of Education, 5(1), 84–96. https://doi.org./10.53819/81018102t5053/
  17. Kaukewahulo, S. (2022). The school principal and teachers’ roles in improving learners’ academic performance at a selected school in the Karas region (Master’s thesis). University of Namibia.
  18. Kapengut, D., & Noble, K. G. (2020). Parental language and learning directed to the young child. The Future of Children, 30(2), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2020.a807752/
  19. Koussihouèdé, O. (2020). Primary school size and learning achievement in Senegal: Testing the quantity–quality trade-off. International Journal of Educational Development, 77, 102225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102225/
  20. Leithwood, K. (2021). A review of evidence about equitable school leadership. Education Sciences, 11, 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080377/
  21. Li, Z., & Qiu, Z. (2018). How does family background affect children’s educational achievement? Evidence from Contemporary China. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 5(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-018-0083-8/
  22. Liu, X. (2023). A literature review of Upper Echelons Theory. SHS Web of Conferences, 169. https://doi.org./10.1051/shsconf/202316901067
  23. Malipot, M. (2019). Year-end report DepEd in 2019: The quest for quality education continues. Manila Bulletin. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/4ut6j6k7
  24. Meelissen, M., & Luyten, H. (2008). The Dutch gender gap in mathematics: Small for achievement, substantial for beliefs and attitudes. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 34(2), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2008.04.004
  25. Munir, J., Daud, S., Faiza, M., Jamal, B., and Iqbal, K. (2023). The impact of socio-economic status on academic achievement. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(2), 695-705. https://doi.org./10.54183/jssr.v3i2.308/
  26. Qadach, M., Schechter, C., & Da’as, R. A. (2020). From principals to teachers to students: Exploring an integrative model for predicting students’ achievements. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(5), 736–778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X20907133/
  27. Rahman, S., Munam, A. M., Hossain, A., M. Delwar Hossain, A. S., & Bhuiya, R. A. (2023). Socio-economic factors affecting the academic performance of private university students in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional bivariate and multivariate analysis. Sn Social Sciences, 3(2). https://doi.org./10.1007/s43545-023-00614-w/
  28. Shadiev, R., Yang, M. K., Reynolds, B. L., & Hwang, W. Y. (2022). Improving English as a foreign language–learning performance using mobile devices in unfamiliar environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2170–2200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1868533/
  29. Shahjahan, M., Ahmed, K.R., Al Hadrami, A., Islam, R., Hossain, S., & Khan, S. (2021). Factors influencing poor academic performance among urban university students in Bangladesh. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(4), 1140–1148. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i4.21158/
  30. Vadivel, B., Alam, S., Nikpoo, I., & Ajanil, B. (2023). The impact of low socioeconomic background on a child’s educational achievements. Education Research International, (1), 6565088. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6565088/
  31. Wilder, S. (2023). Effects of parental involvement on academic achievement: A meta-synthesis. In Mapping the Field. Routledge. https://tinyurl.com/32xm2fwc
  32. Yu, Z. (2022). Sustaining student roles, digital literacy, learning achievements, and motivation in online learning environments during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(8), 4388.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084388/
  33. Zhang, M., Hu, Y., & Hu, Y. (2022). The influences of socioeconomic status on parental educational expectations: Mediating and moderating effects. Sustainability, 15(16), 12308. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612308/

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic