HomeSARIRIT: The University Research Journal (formerly QSU Research Journal)vol. 14 no. 2 (Special Issue) (2025)

Flipping Math: Performance Analysis Of Senior High School Stem Students

Neil Marc G. Tomas

Discipline: Mathematics

 

Abstract:

Mathematics education in the Philippines continues to face obstacles as students reported having difficulty in courses such as Basic Calculus. Limited research has been conducted on the impact of the Flipped Classroom Model (FCM) on students’ performance in senior high school mathematics, where FCM is integrated with AI tools. The study explored the FCM taught grade 11 STEM students’ mathematics performance. The quasi-experimental research design utilized a non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest to 50 purposively sampled students from two public secondary schools in Quirino Province. The experimental group was taught using FCM in combination with the AI tools while the control group received a traditional lecture-based instructional model. The validated pre-test and post-test developed was administered based from the existing Basic Calculus curriculum. Findings revealed that both groups improved significantly, and there was no statistically significant difference acquired between groups (p = .717). Furthermore, the control group had a higher mean gain (25.10) compared to the experimental group (22.50). The Cohen’s d = 0.356 illustrates a small to moderate effect size. This implies that both high-performing and lowperforming students benefited from the FCM, and suggested some potential equitable academic growth in student performance. The study concluded that FCM is effective in developing grade 11 STEM students’ performance in Basic Calculus, but does not produce significantly more positive results over traditional instructional delivery. This warrants consideration of contextual issues and various hybrid instructional models in future research.



References:

  1. Alviar, J., & Solon, J. (2023). Effectiveness of flipped classroom approach in Grade 10 mathematics: A comparative study. Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 11(2), 88–102. DOI: 10.11594/ijmaber.04.02.13.
  2. Antipuesto, J. & Tan, D. (2023). Students’ academic performance and engagement in mathematics via blended learning. American Journal of Educational Research, 11(4), 235-240. DOI: 10.1291/education-11-4-7.
  3. Atef, A., Seddiqi, A., & Mubarez, A. (2024). The effectiveness of the flipped classroom teaching methof on the components of academic optimism in mathematics. Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Studies, ISSN: 2709-4200. DOI: 10.32996/jmss.
  4. Bautista, M. (2023). Bridging the gap: Mathematics education reform in the Philippines. Manila: EduTech Publications.
  5. Chui, H. S., & Chui, S. W. (2024). Effective teaching, teacher-student relation, student engagement and student mathematical achievement. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(12), em2538. DOI: 10.29333/ejmste/15652
  6. Egara, S., & Mosimege, M. (2023). Enhancing secondary school students’ performance in mathematics using the flipped classroom approach. South African Journal of Education Research, 43(2), 210–225. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1006949.
  7. Egara, F. O., & Mosimege, M. (2024). Exploring the integration of artificial intelligence-based ChatGPT into mathematics instruction: Perceptions, challenges, and implications for educators. Education Sciences, 14(7), 742. DOI: 10.3390/educsci14070742.
  8. Esquillo, J. P. (2021). Flipped classroom instructional strategy in teaching mathematics to grade five learners: Basis for video-assisted instructional materials. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 10(5). DOI: 10.5861/ijrse.2021.648.
  9. Fernández-Martín, F., Romero-Rodríguez, J., Gómez-García, G., & Ramos Navas-Parejo, M. (2020). Impact of the flipped classroom method in the mathematical area: A systematic review. Mathematics, 8(12), 2162. DOI: 10.3390/math8122162.
  10. Fung, C., Besser, M., & Poon, K. (2021). Systematic literature review of flipped classroom in mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(6), em1974. DOI: 10.29333/ejmste/10900.
  11. Kamble, VS., Pagare, SG., Pawara, JM., Kamble, SS., Patil, DK., Joshi, MA & Khairnar, SL. (2023). Enhancing mathematical education for students through the integration of software tools. Indian Journal of Natural Sciences, 14(81), ISSN: 0976-0997.
  12. Leiker, D., Gylien, A., Eldesouky, I. &Y Cukurova, M. (2023). Generative AI for learning: investigating the potential; of learning videos with synthetic virtual instructors.  Communications in Computer and Information Science.  DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_81.
  13. OECD. (2022). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning outcomes. OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/19963777.
  14. Oribhabor, R. (2020). Evaluating the effect of activity-based method of teaching mathematics on Nigerian Secondary School students’ achievement in Mathematics. Puissant-A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1, 77-87, ISSN: 2719-0153, e-ISSN: 2719-0161. https://rb.gy/coniu2.
  15. Sosa Díaz, M. J., Guerra Antequera, J., & Cerezo Pizarro, M. (2021). Flipped classroom in the context of higher education: Learning, satisfaction and interaction. Education Sciences, 11(8), 416. DOI: 10.3390/educsci11080416.
  16. Spotts, J. D., & Gutierrez de Blume, A. P. (2020). A pilot study on the effect of the flipped classroom model on pre-calculus performance. Sage Open, 10(4). DOI: 10.1177/2158244020982604.
  17. Torres-Peña, R., García-San Pedro, M. J., & Pozo, J. I. (2024). Artificial intelligence in mathematics education: A new frontier for teaching and learning. AI and Education Review, 2(1), 19–35.
  18. Uchiyama, M., Kimura, T., & Yamamoto, S. (2023). Integration of AI tools into flipped mathematics classrooms: A Japanese case study. Asian Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 88–104.
  19. Zhao, H., & Zhang, J. (2023). Flipped classroom model in high school mathematics: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 87–105. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-022-10110-6