HomeThe PCMC Journalvol. 16 no. 2 (2020)

Utility of the Pediatric Shock Index as a Predictor of Outcomes in Cases of Dengue in a Pediatric Tertiary Children’s Hospital

Socorro Marie V. Buensalido | Mellinor Ang

Discipline: medicine by specialism

 

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Despite extensive studies on dengue fever, there is still limited knowledge about factors associated with poor outcomes in cases of dengue fever. The shock index (SI) is a bedside tool previously used in the adult population, adopted as a marker for poor outcomes in many shock states. There are limited studies applying the SI in children. There are also no known local studies applying an age-adjusted version as a marker or predictor of poor outcomes in severe acute illness, such as dengue. OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic ability of the age-adjusted pediatric shock index in predicting outcomes in cases of dengue admitted at a tertiary children’s hospital. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study performed in a pediatric tertiary hospital over a period of 30 days. Admitting heart rate (HR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were taken to determine their shock index. This was then grouped according to age groups based on known literature and corresponding acceptable age-adjusted shock indices (ASI), and compared with outcomes such as final dengue classification (non-severe vs severe), use of inotropes, and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were identified for the study. Three were excluded due to exclusion criteria. 87 cases were followed up after admission from the ER. Unadjusted Shock Index (USI) was found not to be associated with both final dengue classification (as severe dengue) and use of inotropic support. In contrast, ASI was associated with both final dengue classification (p < 0.001) and use of inotropes (p < 0.039). The ASI had a fairly accurate capability of predicting poor outcomes for both final dengue classifications, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.7122, and eventual use of inotropes, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.6435. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: SI was found to be a helpful tool in predicting poor outcomes, but only when the Age-adjusted Shock Index (ASI) was used. A longer data collection period is recommended to be able to include mortality as an outcome. The predictive value of the tool can be tested against various other markers of poor outcome to widen the application of this non-invasive measure of hemodynamic status.



References:

  1. Current DF / DHF Prevention and Control Programme in the Philippines. DOH Dengue Bulletin 1997. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/han dle10665/148536/dbv21p41.pd f?sequence=1
  2. The Dengue Epidemic of 1998 in the Philippines. DOH Dengue Bulletin 1998. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/148653/dbv22p88.pdf;jsessionid=C13EFE26BFF70801CA4513897A5B9444?sequence=1
  3. Predictors of Dengue-Related Mortality and Disease Severity in a Tertiary Care Center in North India. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017 May 5;4(2):ofx05610.1093/ofid/ofx056
  4. Predicting outcome from dengue. https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12916-014-0147-9
  5. Shock Index Values and Trends in Pediatric Sepsis: Predictors or Therapeutic Targets? A Retrospective Observational Study. Shock. 2016 Sep;46(3):279-86. 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000634
  6. Prognostic value of shock index in children with septic shock. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Oct;29(10):1055-9. 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182a5c99c.
  7. Pediatric specific shock index accurately identifies severely injured children. J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Feb;50(2):331-4.10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.08.009.
  8. A pediatric specific shock index in combination with GMS identifies children with life threatening or severe traumatic brain injury. Pediatr Surg Int. 2015 Nov;31(11):1041-6. 10.1007/s00383-015-3789-6.
  9. 2018 Monthly Dengue Report No. 7. https://www.doh.gov.ph/sites/default/files/statistics/Dengue%20Monthly%20Report_MW1-MW30_2018_No.7.pdf
  10.       Economic Cost and Burden of Dengue in the Philippines. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Feb 4; 92(2):360–366. 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0139
  11. Dengue         virus   infection: Epidemiology. UptoDate. 2018.
  12. Dengue and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. July 1998. https://cmr.asm.org/content/cmr/11/3/480.full.pdf
  13. WHO guidelines on management of Dengue 2009. WHO. 2009.
  14. Top 10 Causes of Morbidity. DOH Website. https://www.doh.gov.ph/morbidity
  15. Average Family Income in 2015 is Estimated at 22 Thousand Pesos Monthly. Philippine Statistics Authority. PSA Website. https://psa.gov.ph/content/average-family-income-2015-estimated-22-thousand-pesos-monthly-results-2015-family-income
  16. Shock Index and Early Recognition of Sepsis in the Emergency Department: Pilot Study. West J Emerg Med. 2013 Mar; 14(2): 168–174. 10.5811/westjem.2012.8.11546
  17. Kliegman, Robert., et al. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. Edition 20. Phialdelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2016.
  18. A Comparison of the Shock Index and Conventional Vital Signs to Identify Acute,Critical Illness in the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Oct;24(4):685-90.