HomeWorld Education Connect Multidisciplinary E-Publicationvol. 4 no. 5 (2024)

Development And Validation Of An English Language Learning Module

Frincess T. Flores

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Communicating effectively and efficiently in English has grown more and more crucial in today's globalized world. English is the universal language in many fields, including academia, business, and technology. As a result, individuals worldwide seek to acquire English language skills to enhance their educational and career prospects. Other countries are perceived to be successful in the enhancement of English. However, the odds of the effectiveness of the teaching, as well as the learning process of the language in the last three years are evidently on the Philippines' side. The country trails other nations worldwide for the standard of education, particularly when it comes to learning the English language.



References:

  1. Achua, G., & Ngwoke, R. N. (2015). Improving learning outcomes through the effective use of instructional materials. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 5(2), 39-45.
  2. ADALIKWU, S. A., & IORKPILGH, I. T. (2013). The Influence of Instructional Materials on Academic Performance of Senior Secondary School Students in Chemistry in Cross River State. Global Journal of Educational Research, 12(1), 39–45.
  3. Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2018). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(3), 424-436. doi:10.1037/edu0000228
  4. Anderson, J., & Matthews, P. (2022). The Role of Formatting in Information Retrieval: Implications for Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(1), 100-115. doi:10.1037/edu0000702
  5. Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2020). Cognitive load theory and multimedia learning: Designing learning environments that support effective information processing. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 217-230. [DOI: 10.1007/s11336-019-09718-2]
  6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
  7. Barak, R., Bhagat, S., & Gabay, L. (2020). Schema activation and the integration of new information in problem-based learning. Instructional Science, 48(3), 425-452. [DOI:10.1007/s11251-020-09424-7]
  8. Benson, A., Smith, J., Johnson, R. (2020). The Influence of Instructional Materials on Student Learning: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 267-285.
  9. Bouchrika, I., Drira, R., & Alimi, A. M. (2022). Design and development of an e-learning platform based on an adaptive educational hypermedia system. Cluster Computing, 25(1), 1377-1393.
  10. Brown, J., Anderson, R., Green, K., & Lee, S. (2022). Teacher Perspectives on Scarcity of Learning Materials: A Case Study. Teachers and Teaching, 86(4), 481-495.
  11. Calderon, M., Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., & Slavin, R. (1998, November 1). Effects of Bilingual Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition on students making the transition from Spanish to English reading. The Elementary School Journal, 99. https://doi.org/10.1086/461920
  12. Campbell, C.P. (1999), "Instructional materials: their preparation and evaluation", Journal of European Industrial Training, 23(2), 57-107. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090599910257515
  13. Carpenter, S. K., Wilford, M. M., Kornell, N., & Mullaney, K. M. (2020). Appearances can be deceiving: instructor fluency increases perceptions of learning without increasing actual learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(5), 989-996. doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01725-7
  14. Cavanagh, S. L. (2020). Designing effective instructional modules for adult learners: A review of the literature. Adult Education Quarterly, 70(2), 142-161. [DOI: 10.1177/0001848019888922]
  15. Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2018). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354-380. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
  16. Chen, W., Liu, S., Wang, H. (2019). A Longitudinal Study of Instructional Materials and Reading Comprehension. Journal of Reading Education, 52(4), 345-361.
  17. Chen, Y., & Li, N. (2020). The impact of multimedia learning on student engagement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 309-335. [DOI: 10.1007/s11336-019-09722-4]
  18. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2020). E-learning and the science of instruction (4th ed.). Routledge. [DOI: 10.4324/9780429268771]
  19. Donnelly, R., & Fitzmaurice, M. (2005). DESIGNING MODULES FOR LEARNING. Technological University Dublin. http://www.aishe.org/readings/2005-1/donnelly-fitzmaurice-Designing_Modules_for_Learning.pdf
  20. Duckworth, A. L., Kirby, T. A., Gollwitzer, A., & Oettingen, G. (2022). From fantasy to reality: A temporal mindset enhances the pursuit of academic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(2), 311-324.
  21. Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2021). Assessment enhances learning. Educational Psychologist, 56(2), 90-101. [DOI: 10.1080/00131644.2020.1853413]
  22. EF EPI 2022 – EF English Proficiency Index – Philippines. (n.d.). https://www.ef.com/wwpt/epi/regions/asia/philippines/
  23. Evans, L. (2022, September 9). The ADDIE Model for Instructional Design. University of San Diego Online Degrees. https://onlinedegrees.sandiego.edu/addie-model-instructional-design/
  24. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2021). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 503-545. doi:10.3102/0034654321992158
  25. Garcia, R., Martinez, E. (2023). Effects of Culturally Relevant Instructional Materials on Minority Student Achievement. Journal of Educational Equity, 18(3), 213-230.
  26. Gerber, E. R. (2020). Learning by integration: The role of topic familiarity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(2), 432-447. [DOI: 10.1037/edu0000327]
  27. Gustiani , S. (2019). RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (R&D) METHOD AS A MODEL DESIGN IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND ITS ALTERNATIVES. In HOLISTICS JOURNAL (Vol. 11, Issue 2,pp. 12–22). https://doi.org/https://jurnal.polsri.ac.id/index.php/holistic/article/view/1849/892
  28. Gueta, M.F. and Janer, S.S., 2021. Distance Learning Challenges on the Use of Self-Learning Module. United International Journal for Research & Technology (UIJRT), 2(7), pp.58-71.
  29. Hafiz, M. A. A., & Al-Mudimigh, A. S. (2015). The impact of instructional materials in enhancing students' learning and retention in chemistry. Universal Journal of Educational Research,3(6), 389-398.
  30. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2020). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 81(1),4-28.
  31. Harsono, Y. M. (2015). DEVELOPING LEARNING MATERIALSFOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES. In TEFLIN (Vol.18, Issue 2, pp. 169–179). https://doi.org/https://journal.teflin.org/index.php/journal/article/view/113
  32. IPROJECT Content Management Team. (2020). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS IN TEACHING AND LEARNING OF BIOLOGY IN SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL. IPROJECT. Retrieved 2022, from https://www.iproject.com.ng/education/the-effectiveness-of-instructional-materials-in-teaching-and-learning-of-biology-in-senior-secondary-school/index.html
  33. Jimenez, T., & Hernandez, M. (2019). Linguistically Diverse Students and the Challenge of Accessible Texts. In M. R. Kuhn, S. A. Stahl, & S. E. Al Otaiba (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Disability Research (pp. 111-124). New York: Routledge.
  34. Jin, H., Liu, X., & Zou, W. (2023). A review of research on the design principles of micro-learning modules. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 1-17. [DOI:10.1007/s11423-022-09963-2]
  35. Johnson, T., & Garcia, L. (2022). Access to Learning Materials and Student Achievement: A Comparative Study. Journal of Educational Equity, 46(1), 32-47.
  36. Jucks, R., & Bromme, R. (2017). Comprehension and Learning from Text. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International Handbook of Emotions in Education (pp. 226-243). New York: Routledge.
  37. Kim, S., & Lockee, B. B. (2022). A design-based research on mobile learning design and its effects on students' learning performance. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(1), 389-412.
  38. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2020). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
  39. Koko, M. N. (2016). THE EFFECTIVE USE OF SCHOOL INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS. Research Gate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329268141_THE_EFFECTIVE_USE_OF_SCHOOL_INSTRUCTIONAL_MATERIALS
  40. Kurt, S. (2018, December 16). ADDIE Model: Instructional Design. Educational Technology. https://educationaltechnology.net/the-addie-model-instructional-design/
  41. Lee, H. J., Yoo, J., Olszewski, B., & Olszewski, J. (2020). Considering Cultural and Linguistic Relevance of Measures for Diverse Populations. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 38(2), 243-255. doi:10.1177/0734282918811199
  42. Leffa, V. J., & Gaies, S. J. (2018). The Impact of Multimedia Instructional Material in Language Learning. Profile Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 20(1), 123-138.
  43. Liu, X., Jin, H., & Zou, W. (2021). Flexible learning through micro-learning modules: A systematic review. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 37-53. [DOI: 10.12973/iji.2021.142.a]
  44. Liu, X., Jin, H., & Zou, W. (2023). A review of research on the design principles of micro learning modules. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 1-17. [DOI:10.1007/s11423-022-09963-2]
  45. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2019). New developments in goal setting and task performance. Routledge.
  46. Lynch, A. (2021). Writing clear and concise learning objectives and language for eLearning modules. TechTrends, 65(5), 775-782. [DOI: 10.1007/s11528-021-00943-1]
  47. Magsambol, B. (2020, October 23). 30 errors found in DepEd’s learning modules. RAPPLER. https://www.rappler.com/nation/errors-identified-deped-learning-modules-distance-learning/
  48. Malik, M. S. (2018). Effectiveness of interactive e-learning modules in students' academic performance. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 359–374.
  49. Mayer, R. E., & Wittrock, M. C. (2019). Problem-Solving Transfer. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 373-392). New York: Routledge.
  50. Mayer, R. E., Fiorella, L., & Stull, A. (2020). Five ways to increase the effectiveness of instructional video. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 837–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09749-6
  51. Merrill, M. D. (2007). Developing effective teaching objectives. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
  52. Morris, J. A., Sitzmann, T., McLaughlin, J. E., & Estrada, S. L. (2019). Using learning modules to develop self-regulated learning in middle school science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 57, 192-202. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.03.002]
  53. Nardo, M. T. B. (2017). Modular Instruction Enhances Learner Autonomy. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(10). https://doi.org/10.12691/education-5-10-3
  54. Nikolopoulou, K. (2023). What is purposive sampling? | Definition & Examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/purposive-sampling/
  55. Oduh, W. A., Agbola, J. O., Ironua, M. O., et al. (2020). Adequacy of Instructional Materials and Interest of Secondary School Students in the Study of Physics in Oredo Local Government Area of Edo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE, 7(6), 222–2229. http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.0706024
  56. Ormeño, V. (2022, 0 0). Principles and Procedures of Materials Development for Language Learning by Brian Tomlinson. PDFCOFFEE. https://pdfcoffee.com/principles-and-procedures-of-materials-development-paper-pdf-free.html
  57. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2019). Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments. Educational Psychologist, 54(1), 1-5. doi:10.1080/00461520.2018.1551600
  58. Pashler, H. E., McDaniel, M. A., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. A. (2020). Less is more in educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 21(2), 3-25. [DOI:10.1177/1529100619880864]
  59. Popham, W. J. (2020). The Faulty Assumptions Underlying Standardized Instructional Materials. Educational Leadership, 77(6), 80-84.
  60. Portana, H. V., Fronda, J. G., Policarpio, D. G. T., Rigat, K. A. R. C., & A. Llames, G. (2021). Effectiveness and Acceptability of Instructional Materials in the Enhancement of Students’ Academic Achievement. International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science, 7(1), 12–15. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaems.71.2
  61. Razak, R. A., & Ismail, H. (2017). Investigating the use of instructional materials in the classroom. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(7), 477-485.
  62. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860.
  63. Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Tracey, M. W. (2021). The instructional design knowledge base: Theory, research, and practice. Routledge.
  64. Sadiq, S. (2016). The importance of learning objectives in curriculum development. Journal of Educational Development, 37(2), 163-173.
  65. Salinas, H., Lopez-Nicolas, C., & Hernandez-Leo, R. (2021). Learning analytics for activity design in self-directed learning environments: A review of the literature. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 127-142. [DOI: 10.14786/ETS.2021.09.06]
  66. Smith, E., Carter, M., & Thomas, B. (2023). Scarcity of Learning Materials and Student Engagement: A Comparative Study. Educational Psychology Review, 121(2), 189-205.
  67. Sullivan, M., Clark, R., Lee, A. (2022). Impact of Multimodal Instructional Materials on Learning in Science Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 59(1), 82-97.
  68. Tarrayo, V. N., & Anudin, A. G. (2021). Materials development in flexible learning amid the pandemic: perspectives from English language teachers in a Philippine state university. Tarlor & Francis Online. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.1939703
  69. Tety, J. L. (2016). ROLE OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS IN ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN COMMUNITY SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN ROMBO DISTRICT. CORE, 16.
  70. Tessler, M. H., & Schwarz, N. (2021). Visual Presentation and Representation of Information in Surveys and Beyond. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 211-238. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-081920-042045
  71. Tomlinson, B. (n.d.). Introduction: principles and procedures of materials development. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved July 19, 2022, from https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/8122612/mod_resource/content/0/Tomlinson%202011%20introduction.pdf
  72. Torrefranca, E.C. (2017). Development and Validation of Instructional Modules on Rational Expressions and Variations. The Normal Lights, 11.
  73. Veroy, M. (2009). Validation sheet. Scribd. Retrieved October 1, 2023, from https://www.scribd.com/document/506379144/VALIDATION-SHEET
  74. V, D., V. Jr, & Dollete, L. F. (n.d.). Development and validation of Physical Science Workbook for Senior High School. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1236361
  75. Wise, A. F., & Chang, J. (2018). Understanding reading engagement from behavioral traces: a multivariate pattern analysis of eye-tracking data. Interactive Learning Environments,26(6), 727-739. doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1456065
  76. Yaki, A. A., Midat, C. Y., & Bawa, S. (2020). Development and evaluation of an innovative instructional module for teaching and learning of biology in senior secondary schools. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 20(2), 227-248.
  77. Yasim, I. , Lubis, M. , Noor, Z. and Kamarudin, M. (2016) The Use of Teaching Aids in the Teaching and Learning of Arabic Language Vocabulary. Creative Education, 7, 443-448. doi: 10.4236/ce.2016.73044.