Home⇛Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Sustainable Development⇛vol. 12 no. 3 Part 3 (2024)

Compliance to Public Bonding Law of Sangguniang Barangay Officials In One Philippine Province

Sherry Ann T. Agapito

Discipline: Politics

 

Abstract:

This study examines the compliance of Sangguniang Barangay officials in Batangas Province with the Public Bonding Law, a legal measure ensuring accountability and financial protection through fidelity bonds. Fidelity bonding is essential in safeguarding public resources and maintaining transparency in local governance. Using a quantitative descriptive research method, the study assessed compliance levels, identified challenges, and analyzed the impact of compliance on governance outcomes. A survey was conducted among 400 barangay officials, including Punong Barangays and Treasurers, to evaluate their adherence to bonding requirements such as application, renewal, and accountability adjustments. Findings indicate that while compliance is generally observed, significant challenges persist, particularly in bond cancellations due to administrative inefficiencies, resource constraints, and lack of awareness. Statistical analyses revealed a strong positive correlation between compliance and improvements in governance transparency, accountability, and ethical standards. However, disparities in compliance rates highlight the need for enhanced training, streamlined administrative processes, and policy refinements. The study underscores the importance of fidelity bonding in reinforcing public trust and financial security within decentralized governance structures. It recommends stronger inter-agency coordination, simplified procedural guidelines, and capacity-building initiatives to improve compliance. These findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, local government units, and oversight agencies in strengthening public accountability mechanisms. By addressing the barriers to compliance, this study contributes to the ongoing discourse on good governance, ethical leadership, and financial integrity in the local government system of the Philippines.



References:

  1. Bureau of Local Government Finance. (2022). Local Treasury Operations Manual (2nd Edition). Bureau of Local Government Finance.
  2. Kim, H., Sefcik, J. S., & Bradway, C. (2017). Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review. Research in nursing & health, 40(1), 23-42.
  3. Bhandari, M. P. (2023). The fundamental principles of social sciences. Business Ethics and Leadership, 7(2), 73-86.
  4. Hartley, J., Sferrazza, R., & Thompson, L. (2020). Procedural clarity and administrative efficiency in public compliance. Public Administration Review, 80(2), 232-245.
  5. Van der Heijden, J., Hudson, J., & Harland, C. (2018). Administrative burden and the compliance decision of public officials. Public Administration Review, 78(3), 383-395.
  6. Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2019). Designing public policies: Principles and instruments. Routledge.
  7. Moynihan, D. P., Pandey, S. K., & Wright, B. E. (2012). Setting the table: How transformational leadership fosters performance information use. Journal of public administration research and theory, 22(1), 143-164.
  8. Chen, H., Chiang, R. H. L., & Storey, V. C. (2018). Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly, 42(2), 515-523.
  9. Gupta, S., & Saksena, N. K. (2018). Financial Management Practices and Their Impact on Organizational Performance. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 30(1), 50-69.
  10. Zhang, Y., & Fei, G. (2019). The Role of Audit in Enhancing Transparency and Accountability: Evidence from Municipal Governments. Public Budgeting & Finance, 39(2), 71-94.
  11.  Mosweu, O., & Rakemane, D. (2020). The role of records management in ensuring good governance in Africa: impediments and solutions. Journal of the South African Society of Archivists, 53, 103-123.
  12. Davis, P., Jones, L., & Garcia, M. (2018). Regional Variations in Compliance Behaviors: The Role of Standardized Procedures. Journal of Public Administration, 45(2), 233-256.
  13. Ertas, N. Sanctions and Incentives in Public Ethics Management. Public Sector Ethics, 72-91.
  14. Kaptein, M., & Wempe, J. F. D. B. (2002). The balanced company: A theory of corporate integrity. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199255504.001.0001
  15. Garcia, M., & Bennett, P. (2019). Reducing Bureaucratic Delays in Public Sector Compliance. Journal of Public Administration, 41(2), 189-203.
  16. Smith, P., & Lewis, M. (2019). Simplifying Administrative Procedures to Enhance Compliance. Public Policy and Administration, 34(2), 233-251.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic