HomeAnnals of Tropical Researchvol. 39 no. Supplement B (2017)

Investment appraisal and risk assessment of protected vegetable cultivation under Leyte conditions

Therese C. Ratilla | Moises Neil V. Seriño

 

Abstract:

Protected cropping technology has been introduced to address the inability of farmers to achieve a successful year-round vegetable production. However, small scale farmers are reluctant to adopt this technology due to huge investment costs and the risk associated with extreme weather conditions. Hence, this study was conducted in some parts of Leyte, to evaluate the profitability and assess the risk of protected and open-field cultivation during the occurrence of extreme weather conditions such as tropical cyclones and strong wind phenomena. Results show that protected cultivation generates higher yields compared to open field cultivation. In Baybay site, investment on steel-type high-strength-tunnel covered with polyethylene plastic is the most viable option as it attained the highest net present values (NPVs), benefit-cost ratios (BCRs) and internal rate of return (IRRs). It also has the earliest payback period across different climatic scenarios. At the Cabintan site, the low-tunnel-structure is the most viable when a high-end market is established. This implies that market outlet is one of the critical factors affecting profitability and pricing. Given the potential of protected cultivation in minimizing crop failures, it is recommended that the government and private sector shall extend financial and technical assistance to farmers. Investors shall be covered with crop and structure insurances as risk of crop failures and loss of capital is high during inclement weather conditions.



References:

  1. Armenia PT, Menz KM, Rogers GS, Gonzaga Z, Gerona R & Tausa ER. 2013. Economics of vegetable production under Protected Cropping Structures in Eastern Visayas, Philippines. Smallholder HOPES horticulture, people and soil. ACIAR Proceedings 139 (pp112-122). Australia: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research
  2. Asian Disaster Risk Center (ADRC). 2008. Asian Disaster Risk Reduction. Retrieved June 26, 2016, from http://www.adrc.asia/nationinformation.php? NationCode=608
  3. Engindeniz S and Tuzel Y. 2006. Economic Analysis of Organic Greenhouse Lettuce Production in Turkey. Scientia Agricola 63(3):285-290
  4. Gonzaga Z, Capuno O, Loreto M, Gerona R, Borines L, Tulin A, Mangmang JS, Lusanta DC, Dimabuyu & Rogers GS. 2013. Low-cost protected cultivation: enhancing year-round production of high-value vegetables in the Philippines. Smallholder HOPES - horticulture, people and soil. ACIAR Proceedings 139 (pp123-137). Australia: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research
  5. Harrison S and Herbohn J. 2008. Financial and economic research methods, In Errington M (ed) ACIAR Training Manual 1. The University of Queensland, Australia: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research
  6. Polat AA, Durgac C & Caliskan O. 2005. Effect of protected cultivation on the precocity, yield and fruit quality in loquat. Scientia Horticulturae 104:189-198
  7. Seriño MN, Castillo G & Ruales J. 2017. Survey on farm practices of small-scale vegetable farmers in the Southern Philippines. Annals of Tropical Research 39 (Supplement B):1-21
  8. Sreedhara D, Kerutagi MG, Basavaraja H, Kunnal L & Dodamani M. 2013. Economics of capsicum production under protected conditions in Northern Karnataka. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 26(2):217-219
  9. Tarannum, Naik HB & Ahamed ZB. 2014. Economic Feasibility and Profitability of Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) Cultivation under Protected Condition. International Journal of Science and Nature 5(2):283-286
  10. Yadav R, Kalia P, Choudhary H & BrihamaDev ZH. 2014. Low-Cost Polyhouse Technologies For Higher Income and Nutritional Security. International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science Technology 5(3):191-196