HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 18 no. 2 (2024)

Enhancement of Learning Performance and Engagement of Grade 10 Learners in Chemistry through Virtual Chemistry Laboratory

Marry Joy Badilles

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

In teaching chemistry, laboratory activities increase student’s interest because it provides hands-on experience for learning. Unfortunately, the school lack these facilities; thus, hands on learning were barely possible. Due to this reason the researcher opted to utilize virtual chemistry laboratory to address the problem. This study attempted to determine the effect of virtual chemistry laboratory to enhance learning performance and engagement of Grade 10 Learners. Pre-experimental research design involving one-group pretest-posttest was utilized. T-tests were used to determine the significant difference between pre-test and post-test scores. Pearson correlation was used to determine the significant relationship between the students’ engagement and learning performance and Cohen’s d was used to determine the effect size. The result revealed an increase in learning performance of students. Moreover, students agreed that they were moderately engaged. There was a significant difference between pre-test and post-test scores of both learning performance and engagement. However, there was no significant relationship between the two variables. The result further revealed that virtual chemistry Laboratory has a large effect to learning performance and engagement. In the teaching and learning process, technology plays an important role in providing an educational atmosphere that stimulate students and motivate them for better learning. In light of the results of this study, since the app utilized was downloaded by the researcher, modifications as to what the virtual laboratory should have been and should have been not possible. Thus, it is recommended that training and seminars could be provided to teachers in developing useful technologies that are personalized and based on their own context.



References:

  1. Al Balushi, K. (2009). The effectiveness of chemistry virtual lab on the development of practical skills and achievement of students at the post basic education in the Sultanate of Oman and their attitudes toward it. Unpublished MA thesis, Institute of Arab Research and Studies, Egypt.
  2. Ambusaidi, A. et. al (2018). The Impact of Virtual Lab Learning Experiences on 9th Grade Students’ Achievement and Their Attitudes Towards Science and Learning by Virtual Lab. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 15(2),13-29. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1313744
  3. Ahmad, A. (2010). The effect of using a virtual lab on the physics concepts achievement, acquisition of higher-order thinking skills and motivation toward science learning among students of the third preparatory class. Scientific Journal of Education, 13(6), 1-46, Egypt.
  4. Baladoh, S. M.; Elgamal, A. F.; Abas, H. A. (2017). Virtual Lab to Develop Achievement in Electronic Circuits for Hearing-Impaired Students. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1152680
  5. Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(4), 349-362.
  6. Calog, Guen (2022). Facebook Classroom: An applied Reinforcement Learning Platform to increase students’ engagement and learning performance in physical Science. Malinao High Shool- Senior High School. 
  7. Casuso-Holgado, M. J., Cuesta-Vargas, A. I., Moreno-Morales, N., Labajos-Manzanares, M. T., Barón-López, F. J., & Vega-Cuesta, M. (2013). The association between academic engagement and achievement in health sciences students. BMC Medical Education, 13(1). doi:10.1186/1472-6920-13-33
  8. DepEd Order No. 8 series of 2015. Policy Guidelines on Classroom Assessment for the K-12 Basic Education Program
  9. El-Koumy, A. A. (2009). The effects of homogeneous versus heterogeneous reading-style grouping on EFL students’ non-preferred reading style and reading comprehension. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509192.pdf
  10. Gunuc, S. (2014). The Relationship Between Student Engagement and Their Academic Achievement. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 5(4). http://www.ijonte.org/FileUpload/ks63207/File/19..gunuc.pdf
  11. Kamenetz, A. (2014). How engaged are students and teachers in American schools? Mind Shift. http://blogs.kqed.org/mindshift/2014/04/how-engaged-are-students-and-teachers-in-american-schools/
  12. Lei, H., Cui, Y., Zhou, W., (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. An International Journal, 476-3. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054
  13. Nole, S. & Koretsky M. Affordances of Virtual and Physical Laboratory Projetc sfor the Instructional Design: Impacts on Student Engagment. IEE Transaction on Education. http://www.ieee.org/publications standards/publications/rights/index.html
  14. Olson, A & Peterson, R.  (2015). Student Engagement. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0732. https://k12engagement.unl.edu/StudentEngagement10-2-15.pdf
  15. Ross, J., Guerra, E. & Gonzalez-Ramos, S. (2020). Linking a hierarchy of attitude effect to student engagement and chemistry achievement. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 357-370. DOI: 10.1039/c9rp00171a
  16. Sanchez, D. & Mercado, M (2020). Gas Learn. Copyright ©MAPPS.
  17. Subramaniamn, R. & Marsic, I (2001). ViBE: Virtual Biology Experiments. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ViBE%3A-virtual-biology-experiments-Subramanian-Marsic/d5975d1d88b0cd4e1210fd984266c92b618f6535
  18. Tatli, Z., & Ayas, A. (2013). Effect of a Virtual Chemistry Laboratory on Students’ Achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 16 (1), 159-170.
  19. Trindade, J., Fiolhais, C., & Almedia, L. (2002). Science learning in virtual environments: A descriptive study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 471–488
  20. Tuyuz, C. (2010). The effects of virtual laboratory on students’ achievement and attitudes in chemistry. International Online Journal of Sciences, 2(1), 37-53
  21. Urquijo, I., & Extremera, N. (2017). Academic satisfaction at university: The relationship between emotional intelligence and academic engagement. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 15(3), 553-573. doi:10.14204/ejrep.43.16064
  22. Yaman, M., Nerdel, C., & Bayrhuber, H. (2008). The Effects of Instructional Support and Learner Interests when Learning Using Computer Simulations. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ807636