HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 18 no. 9 (2024)

Demands Encountered in Modular Learning at Ibn Mas-Oud Integrated School

Sittie Hakima Hasanodin | Carlito Abarquez

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The study used the descriptive survey method of research. This determined the age, civil status, educational attainment, occupation, and family monthly income of the respondents. The socio- economic profile of the respondents and the demands of the modular learning approach were correlated to the academic performance of the learners. The study was conducted in Ibn Mas-Oud Integrated School for the school year 2020-2021, with 25 parents as respondents. The questionnaire was a researcher-made instrument. The following statistical techniques employed the frequency count and mean percentage, and Pearson product-moment correlation. Major findings showed that most parent respondents were female. This would show that mothers were always facilitators for their kids compared to the father. Most of the respondents belonged to 30-39 years of age, married, majority were college graduates, self-employed, and with an income bracket of at most 9,999 pesos per month. As depicted, the parents were always improving their parent-child relationship and always returned and got the module on time. Also, the parents always tried to find the solution to accomplish the capacities of the learners. Further, they were often active contributors to their kids’ academic futures. Results also revealed that the learners had outstanding academic performance levels. The study also concluded that parents of grade 1 learners in Balo-i Lanao Del Norte's private schools believed that the demands encountered had a positive impact on their positive growth in general. It was inferred that facilitating the learners helped to build their capacities by giving time to monitor their children to develop their self- esteem.



References:

  1. Agostinelli,F. Doepke M. Sorrenti G. & Zilibotti F. (2022). When the great equalizer shuts down: Schools, peers, and parents in pandemic times. Journal of Public Economics. 206, 104574.
  2. Aguiar, J.Matias, M. & Carolina, A. (2021). Parental burnout and the COVID-19 pandemic: How Portuguese parents experienced lockdown measures. Family Relations 70(4), 927-938.
  3. Aliyyah, R. R., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A., Syaodih, E., Nurtanto, M., & Tambunan, A. R. S. (2020). The perceptions of primary
  4. school teachers of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic period: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 90-109.
  5. AL-Mutairi, A. (May 2011). Factors affecting business students’ performance in Arab open university: The case of Kuwait. International Journal of Business and Management: Vol. 6, No. 5.
  6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman. Research Journal.
  7. Durisic, M. & Bunijevac, M. (2017). Parental involvement as an important factor for successful education: Models of parental involvement. 7, (3), 140.
  8. Epstein, J. L. (2001). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparin educators and improving schools. Research Journal.
  9. Epstein, J.L. (1987). Parental involvement: What research says to administrators. Education and Urban Society, 19, 119-136.
  10. Fan, X. (2001). Parental involvement and student academic achievement: A growth modeling analysis. Journal of Experiential Education, 70(1), 27-61.
  11. Fan, X. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review. 13(1),1-22.
  12. Garbe, A. Ogurlu, U. & Logan, N. (2020). COVID-19 and remote learning: Experience of parents with children during the pandemic. American Journal of Qualitative Research 4(3), 45-46.
  13. Gestwicki, C. (2007). Home, school, and community relations (6th ed.).Thompson. Research Journal.
  14. Grolnick, W. S., Benjet, C., Kurowski, C. O., & Apostoleris, N. H. (1997). Predictors of parent involvement in children’s schooling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 538– 548.
  15. Harb, Nasri & El-Shaarwi, Ahmed. (July 2006). Factors affecting students’ performance. MPRA Paper No. 1362.
  16. Hoover, K. (2020). Parental involvement in children’s education: Why does it make differences. Research Journal.
  17. Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children’s education? Review of Educational Research, 67, 3–42.
  18. Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Walker, J. M. T., & Sandler, H. M. (2005). In E. N. Patrikakou, R. P. Weisberg, S. Redding, & H. J. Walberg, (Eds.). School-family partnerships for children’s success (pp. 40–56). Teachers College Press.
  19. Liu, J. & Bray M. (2020). Evolving micro-level processes of demand for private supplementary tutoring: Patterns and implications at primary and lower secondary levels in China. Educational Studies 46(2), 170-187.
  20. Maddocks, D.A. & Locks, M. (2016). The relation between private speech and parental interactive style. In R.M. Diaz & L.E. Berk (Eds.). Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation (pp. 85–100). Erlbaum.BBC News NI Education Correspondent.
  21. Mahmud, R., & Ismail, M. A. (2010). Impact of training and experience in using ICT on in- service teachers’ basic ICT literacy. Malaysian Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 5-10.
  22. Motala, F. P & Menon, M.L, (2020). Blended learning, an approach in Philippines basic education curriculum in new normal. Research,Journal 11, 5505-5512.
  23. Mushtaq, I. & Khan, D. N., (2012). Factor affecting students’ academic performance. Global Journal of Management and Business
  24. Research. Global Journals Inc. Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Research Journal. 12, (9), 1.0, 2249-4588, (https://www.academia.edu).
  25. Nyanamba, J. M., Liew, J., & Li, D. (2021, October 14). Parental burnout and remote learning at home during the COVID-19 pandemic: Parents’ motivations for involvement. School Psychology. Advance Online Publication. https://dx.org./10.1037/spq0000483.
  26. Harb, Nasri & El-Shaarwi, Ahmed. (July 2006). Factors affecting students’ performance. MPRA Paper No. 1362.
  27. Panganiban, G. & Madrigal D. (2021). Grappling with the learning modules: Experience of public elementary pupils attending English written modular classes. Technium Soc. Sci. J. 20,263
  28. Peniero, J. (2020). Filipino parents, teachers face challenges over proposed blended learning. Support Alternative Journalism, Support Bulatlat.Com.
  29. Peters, L.P Olivarb, M.V & Eco, C. (2020). Education and COVID -19, experiences and insights from a developing country. Research Journal.
  30. Pinkelt, K.G., (2002). Parental involvement and its effects on student academic achievement. Theses and Dissertations. 5, (1), 1499, https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/1499.
  31. Sharma, H.L., (2014). Academic self-efficacy: A reliable predictor of educational performances. European Centre for Research Training and Development UK. British Journal of Education. 2, (3), 57-64, www.ea-journals.org.
  32. Sheldon, S. B., & Epstein, J. L. (2005a). School programs of family and community involvement to support children’s reading and literacy development across the grades. In J. Flood & P. L. Anders (Eds.). Literacy development of students in urban schools. (pp. 107–138). International Reading Association.
  33. Tekin, A. (2011). Parental involvement revisited: Background theories and models. Early Childhood Education University of Gaziantep. 11, (1), 11-11-2014, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268079028.
  34. Toquero, C. (2021). Emergency remote education experiment amid covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 162-176.
  35. Umali, D. (2020). Education and community manager, challenges of parental involvement in education. https://www.humanandhopeassociation.org/challenges-parental-involvement.