HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 18 no. 9 (2024)

Effect of Orton-Gillingham-Based Reading Intervention on Developing the Letter Recognition of Kindergarten Learners with Learning Disability

Eden Angeles | NescieĀ  Gonzales

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The main thrust of this study was to improve the reading level of Kindergarten learners with learning disabilities using Orton-Gillingham-Based Reading Intervention. This study utilized experiments with one group pretest and posttest. The respondents were the fourteen (14) Kindergarten learners with learning disabilities of Tebag Elementary School, Mangaldan, Pangasinan, who were currently enrolled for the school year 2022- 2023. Orton-Gillingham was utilized in the teaching and learning process for several months. The reading materials were used, which served as the main data-gathering instrument. The pretest results show a need for intervention since the research participants posted lower mean and Mean Percentage scores. Orton- Gillingham-Based Reading Intervention was implemented, and a posttest was administered. In the posttest, the study revealed that the letter recognition of kindergarten learners with learning disabilities had improved. T-tests were used to determine the significant difference in the pretest and post-test scores of the respondents. The t-stat is higher than the t-critical value since the hypothesis was rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis. This means there is a significant difference in the pretest and posttest scores of the respondents. It is also concluded that the Orton-Gillingham-Based Reading Intervention is efficacious in improving the reading level of the learners. Teachers should strongly use Orton-Gillingham-Based Reading Intervention in the teaching and learning process



References:

  1. Agance, J. S. (2020). Literacy: Trends and explanations. Educational Researchers, 12, 3- 8.
  2. Ashworth, D. R. (1999). Effects of Orton-Gillingham instruction programs on the reading achievement of second graders. Reading Improvement, 36(4), 150-156.
  3. Adams, G. S. (2019). Bridges to literacy: Learning from Reading Recovery. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  4. Burn, T. F. and Roe, F.D. (2018). The effects of early reading interventions on learner reading levels and achievement. (Order No. 3380429, Lindenwood University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses,
  5. Balise, K S. (2018). Paradigms of knowledge and instruction. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 463 Retrievedfromhttp://ezproxy.fgcu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/21411940 5?accountid=10919
  6. Cabardo, B. (2022). My pedagogical creed. School Journal. 54, 77–80. http://dewey.pragmatism.org/creed.htm.
  7. Carell, K.E. (2018). Orton-Gillingham-Based Instruction in teaching Alphabetic Phonics. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/InterventionReports/wwc_alpha_phonics_070110.pdf
  8. Clark, D. & Uhry, K.L. (2019). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, (14)4, 481-533.
  9. Engelmann, A. and Colvin, J. (2020). The Orton-Gillingham-Based Reading Intervention to remediation in developmental dyslexia. In. RN Malatesha & PG Aaron. Reading disorders: Varieties and treatments, 409-433.
  10. Goeke. L. (2020). Second chances: Improving decoding skills in the older learner. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 231-242.
  11. Litcher, S. & Roberge, K.L. (2020). Foreward. In R. Spalding and M. North. Writing road to reading: The Spalding method for teaching speech, spelling, writing, and reading (6th ed.), Haper Collins Publishers: New York, NY.
  12. Lyon, B., & Liuzzo, R. (2018). Phonemic awareness and letter knowledge in the child’s acquisition of the alphabetic principle. Journal of Educational Psychology.
  13. Maddox, M. J., (2020). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  14. Noe, A., (2020). Introduction to early childhood education. Boston, MA: Pearson.
  15. Ravitch, M. (2019). Reading outcomes for learners with and without reading disabilities in general education middle-school content area classes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23(4), 238-252.
  16. Richey, J., & Goeke, D. (2020). School quality and the longer-term effects of Head Start (No. w6362). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  17. Stahl, M. M. (2017). The reading Recovery programme. 1984-88: Coverage, outcomes and Education board district figures. New
  18. Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 25, 61-70. Stanovich, M. M., (2020). Reading recovery: A guidebook for teachers in training. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
  19. Stillman, P.E. (2020). Barton Reading & Spelling System. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/InterventionReports/wwc_barton_070110.pdf.
  20. Wallace, A. M. (2019). Current status of treatments for dyslexia: Critical review. Journal of Child Neurology, 19(10), 744-758.