Home⇛Annals of Tropical Research⇛vol. 45 no. 1 (2023)

Participatory extension for empowerment: Paradoxes unboxed in the fishery sector

Henry Y. Goltiano

 

Abstract:

The study looked at levels of participation in the extension approach of the NGO tapped to implement coastal resource management under the Fishery Sector Program and the Fisheries Resource Management Project (FSP-FRMP) in Leyte, Philippines and whether participatory extension led to the empowerment of fishers. The Spearman Ranks Correlation Test showed that participation and empowerment were correlated with correlation coefficient rs=0.30125, which represents weak correlation. Respondents' participation and empowerment levels were low due to several factors that included demoralizing attitude of local government officials, disruption in FSP-FRMP implementation, overassertiveness of NGO staff, squabbling among program implementers, and fisherfolk's sense of the futility of their efforts. Respondents saw participatory extension as a hollow process that pretended to give small fishers control over management of fishery resources, when in fact the elite continued to dominate. It was concluded that participatory extension may or may not promote empowerment, depending on several factors. Participatory extension was inadequate in bringing about true empowerment, because true empowerment calls for the revamp of socioeconomic-political structure that acts against the interest of poor fishers. With externally-initiated development programs being time-bound, NGOs implementing them are forced by expediency to accomplish fund-provider-set targets on time, thus disregarding time-consuming participatory processes.



References:

  1. Ahmad MS and Bt Abu Talib N. 2015. Empowering local communities: Decentralization, empowerment and community driven development. Quality and Quantity 49(2): 817-838
  2. Antholt C and Zijp W. 1996. Participation in agricultural extension. In The World Bank Participation Sourcebook (pp215-217) World Bank, Washington DC..Doi:10.1596/0- 8213-3558-8
  3. Ako JN. 2017. Participatory development: A study of community and citizen participation in development and policymaking in Stockholm, Varmdo and Brotkyrka municipalities in Sweden (unpublished master’s thesis). Malmo University, Sweden
  4. Asian Development Bank. 2007. Philippines: Fisheries Resource Management Project. Completion Report. November 2007
  5. Asian Development Bank. 1999. Program performance audit report on the Fisheries Sector Program in the Philippines. December 1999
  6. Bacque MH and Biewener C. 2013. Different manifestations of the concept of empowerment: The politics of urban renewal in the United State and United Kingdom. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37(6):2198-2213
  7. Balgos MC and Pagdilao CR. 2002. Provincial and regional institutions in the Philippines: An essential element in coastal resource management and marine conservation.Background paper for the Workshop on Institutional Frameworks for Community Based-Coastal Resources Management and Marine Conservation in the Visayas Region, Leyte, Philippines March 14-15, 2002, University of Rhode Island Bay Campus, South Ferry Road, Narragansett, RI, USA. Available at https://www.crc.uri.edu/download/Philippines_Background_Paper.pdf
  8. Baquiano MJ. 2016. Understanding coastal resource management using a social representations approach. Ocean & Coastal Management 133:18-27
  9. Bhandari M. 2014. Civil society and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) movements in Nepal in terms of social transformation. The Pacific Journal of Science and Technology 15(1): 177-189
  10. Bragee I. 2006. Perceptions of empowerment: A minor field study of the concept discrepancy between the dominating discourse and the reality of women in microcredit groups (MS Thesis). School of Business, Stockholm University
  11. Brillantes AB. 1994. Redemocratization and decentralization in the Philippines: The increasing leadership role of NGOs. International Review of Administrative Sciences 60(4):575-586
  12. Buenavista G, Butler-Flora C & Meares AC. 1994. Surviving natural resource decline: Exploring gender, class and social capital in Agbanga, Philippines. Ecogen Case Studies Series, Office of International Research and Development, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia
  13. Court J, Mendizabal E, Osborne D & Young J. 2006. Policy engagement: How civil society can be more effective. Research and Policy in Development (RAPID), Overseas Development Institute (ODI), Britain
  14. Eder JF. 2005. Coastal resource management and social differences in Philippine fishing communities. Human Ecology 33:147-169
  15. Fabinyi M, Knudsen M & Segi S. 2010. Social complexity, ethnography and coastal resource management in the Philippines. Coastal Management 38(6):617-632
  16. FAO. 1997. Improving agricultural extension. A reference manual. Edited by Burton E. Swanson, Robert P. Bentz, Andrew J. Sofranko. FAO, Rome. ISBN 92-5-104007-9
  17. Ferrer EM and Nozawa CMC. 1997. Community-based coastal resources management in the Philippines: Key concepts, methods and lessons learned. University of the Philippines Diliman, Diliman, Quezon City
  18. Filho JF and Vargas FG. 2017. Role and limitations of NGOs in partnership with the state. Revista Estudios De Politicas Publicas 3(1):1-10
  19. Gombe SY, Suandi TB, Ismail IA & Omar Z. 2016. Extension education’s role towards community empowerment in Nigeria: Issues, challenges and prospects. Journal of Education and Social Policy 3(2):135-142
  20. Green SJ, Flores JO, Dizon-Corrales Q, Martinez RT, Nunal DRM, Armada NB White & AT. 2004. The fisheries of Central Visayas, Philippines: Status and trends. Coastal Resource Management Project of the Department of Environment and National Resources and the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources of the Department of Agriculture, Cebu City, Philippines (p159)
  21. Halwart M and Haylor G. 2000. Participatory approaches for aquatic resources management and development thoughts and lessons collected by DFID and FAO during 2000. In , Participatory Approaches and Extension Strategies, International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management (ICLARM), Manila, Philippines. Available at http://pubs.iclarm.net/Pubs/IIRR/pdf/iirr_approaches_strategies.pdf 
  22. Hagmann J, Chuma E, Murwira K & Connolly M. 2020. Learning together through participation extension: A guide to an approach developed in Zimbabwe (2ndedn). Department of Agricultural, Technical and Extension Services (AGRITEX), Harare, Zimbabwe
  23. Inagaki N. 2007. Communicating the impact of communication for development: Recent trends in empirical research. World Bank Working Paper No. 120. Washington, DC. Available at https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/6728
  24. Israel DC, Adan EY, Lopez NF & de Castro . JG 2004. Household Perceptions of the Long-Term Impact of Coastal Resources Management in Panguil Bay, PIDS Discussion Paper Series, No. 2004-02, Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Makati City, Philippines
  25. Jahan R. 2010. Strengthening national mechanisms for gender equality and the empowerment of women: A global synthesis study. United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women. New York, USA
  26. Kabeer N. 2002. Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. In Kabeer N, McFadden P, Arnfred S, Dominguez E & Sadallaah S (eds) Discussing Women’s Empowerment: Theory and Practice (pp17-57). International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA), Stockholm, Sweden
  27. Kamruzzaman P. 2020. Exploring the nexus between participation and empowerment. Journal of Development Policy and Practice 5(1):32-53
  28. Kawabata Y and Aoki H. 2009. Ex-post evaluation of the Fishery Resource Management Project. Japan International Cooperation Agency (pp1-19). Philippines
  29. Laderchi CR. 2001. Participatory methods in the analysis of poverty: A critical review. Working Paper Number 62, QEH Working Paper Series-QEHWPS62, University of Oxford, Oxford
  30. Lecoutere E, Spielman DJ & Van Campenhout B. 2020. Women’s empowerment, agricultural extension and digitalization: Disentangling information and role model effects in rural Uganda. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC
  31. Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives of Zambia (MAC Zambia). 2009. Participatory extension approach: Trainer’s manual (3rd edn). Zambia, Africa
  32. Montalbo IC, Alejandro BA, Baylan SL, Lacea RL, Pepito GM and Villarante GA. 2021. Sustaining women empowerment community extension project: A tri-focal partnership model. Asian Journal of University Education 17(3):21-33
  33. Narayan D. 2002. Empowerment and poverty reduction: A sourcebook. The World Bank, Washington, DC
  34. Narayanan P. 2003. Empowerment through participation: How effective is this approach? Economic and Political Weekly 38(25):21-27
  35. Oakley P. 1995. People’s participation in development projects: A critical review of current theory and practice. INTRAC Occasional Papers Series7, INTRAC, Oxford
  36. Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA). 2020. Farmers, fisherfolks, individuals residing in rural areas and children posted the highest poverty incidences among the basic sectors in 2018. Available at http://www.psa.gov.ph/poverty-press-releases/nid/162541
  37. Pretty JN. 1995. Regenerating agriculture: Policies and practice for sustainability and self- reliance. Earthscan Publications, London, United Kingdom
  38. Reid B. 2011. Securitizing participation in the Philippines: KALAHI and community-driven development. Journal of Contemporary Asia 41(1):47-74
  39. Rivera WM, Qamar MK & Van Crowder L. 2001. Agricultural and rural extension worldwide: Options for institutional reform in developing countries. Food and Agriculture organization, Rome
  40. Samah AA and Aref F. 2009. People’s participation in community development: A case study in a planned village settlement in Malaysia. Word Rural Observations 1(2):45-54
  41. Schober P, Boer C and Schwarte LA. 2018. Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia and Analgesia 126:1763-1768
  42. Swanson BE. 2009. Changing extension paradigms within a rapidly changing global economy. In Paffarini C and Santucci FM (eds) Proceeding from the 19th European Seminar on Extension Education: Theory and practice of advisory work in a time of turbulences, Perugia, Italy, 15-19 September 2009. DSEEA, Facolta di Agraria
  43. Swanson BE and Rajalahti R. 2010. Strengthening agricultural extension and advisory systems: Procedures for assessing, transforming and evaluating extension systems. Agricultural and rural development discussion paper 45. World Bank, Washington, DC
  44. Taylor R. 1990. Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: A basic review. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography 1:35-39
  45. Thomas P. 2002. Development project design: Towards better practice. In Storey D, Overton J & Nowak B (eds) Contesting development: Pathways to better practice: Proceedings from the Third Biennial Conference of the Aotearoa New Zealand International Development Studies Network (DevNet), Institute of Development Studies, 5-7 December 2002. Massey University, Palmerston North
  46. Thomas P. 2013. Perspective on participation and partnerships: Participatory planning and practice in Vanuatu. In Thomas P (ed) Challenges for participatory development in contemporary development practice (pp21-25). Development Bulletin No. 75, Development Studies Network, National Australian University
  47. Wahid A, Ahmad MS, Bt Abu Talib N, Shah IA, Tahir M, Ali Jan F & Saleem MQ. 2017. Barriers to empowerment: Assessment of community-led local development organizations in Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 74(2):1361-1370
  48. Zaragoza ACP-EP African, Caribbean and Pacific States-European Union 2001. In Wittmer H and Hassan ZE (eds), Proceedings of the INCO-DEV International Workshop; on Policy Options for the Sustainable Use of Coral Reefs and Associated Ecosystems, 19-22 June 2000, Mombasa, Kenya. Published by the African, Caribbean and Pacific State-European Union Initiative

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic