Leadership Skills and School Performance of Teachers In-Charge in Integrated Schools
Jennylyn C. Ortiz
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
This study explored the leadership skills of Teachers In-Charge (TICs) and their relationship with
school performance in selected integrated public schools in Glan, Sarangani Province. Positioned in
contexts with no full-time principals, TICs take on multifaceted roles that demand strong instructional
leadership, communication, and decision-making abilities. Using a descriptive-correlational design, the
study involved 7 TICs and 102 teachers. Data were gathered through validated survey instruments and
documentary analysis of school performance records, including NAT Grade 6 and 12, and ELLNA results.
Findings revealed that both TICs and their teachers consistently rated the TICs’ supervisory,
communication, and decision-making skills very high, with no significant differences between selfassessments and teacher ratings. Despite these firm leadership profiles, results of Spearman’s rho and
multiple regression analyses showed no statistically significant relationship between leadership skills and
school performance indicators, nor between the TICs’ demographic profiles and their perceived leadership
skills. This suggests that while TICs demonstrate effective leadership in their schools, academic
performance may be influenced by broader systemic or contextual factors such as resource availability,
instructional support, or student needs. This study contributes to the growing literature on non-traditional
school leadership, particularly in underserved and decentralized educational settings. It emphasizes
recognizing and supporting TICs who lead without formal titles, often under resource constraints. Future
research may delve into qualitative dimensions of TIC leadership, explore longitudinal outcomes, or
examine the impact of targeted leadership development programs. Strengthening TICs’ capacity through
professional support and policy frameworks may help translate strong leadership practices into improved
school performance in similar rural contexts. The integrated schools of Glan included in this study are:
Segafu Esgafu Integrated School, Banlas Integrated School, Tampus Integrated School, Kaltuad Integrated
School, Gulo Integrated School, Batutuling Integrated School, and Panambalan Integrated School.
References:
- Angelle, P. S., & Schmid, J. B. (2007). School leadership and leadership development: A literature review. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760601091234
- Balyer, A. (2012). Transformational leadership behaviors of school principals: A qualitative research based on teachers’ perceptions. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(3), 581–591. https://tinyurl.com/u4d5925z
- Balyer, A., & Özcan, K. (2022). Instructional leadership practices of school principals: Evidence from effective schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220901856
- Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2014). School leadership models: What do we know? School Leadership & Management, 34(5), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.928680
- Calmorin, L. P. & Calmorin, M. A. (2012). Methods of research and thesis writing. 1st edition. (Reprint). Rex Books Store.
- Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863
- Del Rosario, M. L., & Galang, M. C. (2021). Exploring the realities of school leadership in rural contexts: A qualitative study. Philippine Journal of Education, 100(1), 24–39.
- Department of Education. (2016). National Adoption and Implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for School Heads (DepEd Order No. 24, s. 2020).
- Department of Education. (2016). Policy Guidelines on the National Assessment of Student Learning for the K to 12 Basic Education Program (DepEd Order No. 55, s. 2016). https://www.deped.gov.ph
- DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, N., & Humphrey, S. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 7–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01201.x
- Eberhard, A., Reinhardt, H., & Stottlemyer, B. (2022). Beyond credentials: What predicts effective school leadership? Educational Leadership Review, 23(1), 35–49.
- Garcia, L. P., & Marquez, R. L. (2017). Influence of instructional supervision on learners’ literacy skills. Philippine Journal of Education, 92(3), 45–52.
- Grissom, J. A., Egalite, A. J., & Lindsay, C. A. (2021). How principals affect students and schools: A systematic synthesis of two decades of research. The Wallace Foundation. https://www.wallacefoundation.org
- Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111116699
- Hallinger, P. (2020). Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218809298
- Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659–689. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209340042
- Hersey, P., Blanchard, K. H., & Johnson, D. E. (2012). Management of organizational behavior: Leading human resources (10th ed.). Pearson.
- Klar, H. W., & Brewer, C. A. (2013). Successful leadership in high-needs schools: An examination of core leadership practices enacted in challenging contexts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(5), 768–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13482577
- Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565829
- Liu, Y., Wang, H., & Li, X. (2022). Leadership congruence and team effectiveness: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 29(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518211010590
- Northouse, P. G. (2019). Leadership: Theory and practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
- Nguyen, D., Ng, D., & Le, T. T. (2021). Instructional leadership in Vietnam: Practices and challenges of school leaders. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2019.1671802
- OECD. (2020). School leadership for learning: Insights from TALIS 2018. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/12091401
- Quin, J., Deris, A., Bischoff, G., & Johnson, J. T. (2015). The relationship between principal leadership and teacher morale. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 10(2), 1–22. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1071390
- Saiti, A., & Saitis, C. (2021). The role of school leaders in times of crisis: COVID-19 experience. International Studies in Educational Administration, 49(1), 6–17.
- Sebastian, J., Huang, H., & Allensworth, E. (2017). The role of teacher leadership in how principals influence classroom instruction and student learning. American Journal of Education, 123(1), 69–108. https://doi.org/10.1086/688169
- Sharma, S., & Mehta, D. (2018). Role of leadership in school performance: A critical analysis. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(5), 843–859. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2016-0234.
- Tschannen-Moran, M. (2014). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Full Text:
Note: Kindly Login or Register to gain access to this article.
ISSN 2984-8385 (Online)
ISSN 2984-8288 (Print)