HomeJournal of Interdisciplinary Perspectivesvol. 3 no. 7 (2025)

Leadership Skills and School Performance of Teachers In-Charge in Integrated Schools

Jennylyn C. Ortiz

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study explored the leadership skills of Teachers In-Charge (TICs) and their relationship with school performance in selected integrated public schools in Glan, Sarangani Province. Positioned in contexts with no full-time principals, TICs take on multifaceted roles that demand strong instructional leadership, communication, and decision-making abilities. Using a descriptive-correlational design, the study involved 7 TICs and 102 teachers. Data were gathered through validated survey instruments and documentary analysis of school performance records, including NAT Grade 6 and 12, and ELLNA results. Findings revealed that both TICs and their teachers consistently rated the TICs’ supervisory, communication, and decision-making skills very high, with no significant differences between selfassessments and teacher ratings. Despite these firm leadership profiles, results of Spearman’s rho and multiple regression analyses showed no statistically significant relationship between leadership skills and school performance indicators, nor between the TICs’ demographic profiles and their perceived leadership skills. This suggests that while TICs demonstrate effective leadership in their schools, academic performance may be influenced by broader systemic or contextual factors such as resource availability, instructional support, or student needs. This study contributes to the growing literature on non-traditional school leadership, particularly in underserved and decentralized educational settings. It emphasizes recognizing and supporting TICs who lead without formal titles, often under resource constraints. Future research may delve into qualitative dimensions of TIC leadership, explore longitudinal outcomes, or examine the impact of targeted leadership development programs. Strengthening TICs’ capacity through professional support and policy frameworks may help translate strong leadership practices into improved school performance in similar rural contexts. The integrated schools of Glan included in this study are: Segafu Esgafu Integrated School, Banlas Integrated School, Tampus Integrated School, Kaltuad Integrated School, Gulo Integrated School, Batutuling Integrated School, and Panambalan Integrated School.



References:

  1. Angelle, P. S., & Schmid, J. B. (2007). School leadership and leadership development: A literature review. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760601091234
  2. Balyer, A. (2012). Transformational leadership behaviors of school principals: A qualitative research based on teachers’ perceptions. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(3), 581–591. https://tinyurl.com/u4d5925z
  3. Balyer, A., & Özcan, K. (2022). Instructional leadership practices of school principals: Evidence from effective schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220901856
  4. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  5. Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2014). School leadership models: What do we know? School Leadership & Management, 34(5), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.928680
  6. Calmorin, L. P. & Calmorin, M. A. (2012). Methods of research and thesis writing. 1st edition. (Reprint). Rex Books Store.
  7. Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863
  8. Del Rosario, M. L., & Galang, M. C. (2021). Exploring the realities of school leadership in rural contexts: A qualitative study. Philippine Journal of Education, 100(1), 24–39.
  9. Department of Education. (2016). National Adoption and Implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for School Heads (DepEd Order No. 24, s. 2020).
  10. Department of Education. (2016). Policy Guidelines on the National Assessment of Student Learning for the K to 12 Basic Education Program (DepEd Order No. 55, s. 2016). https://www.deped.gov.ph
  11. DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, N., & Humphrey, S. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 7–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01201.x
  12. Eberhard, A., Reinhardt, H., & Stottlemyer, B. (2022). Beyond credentials: What predicts effective school leadership? Educational Leadership Review, 23(1), 35–49.
  13. Garcia, L. P., & Marquez, R. L. (2017). Influence of instructional supervision on learners’ literacy skills. Philippine Journal of Education, 92(3), 45–52.
  14. Grissom, J. A., Egalite, A. J., & Lindsay, C. A. (2021). How principals affect students and schools: A systematic synthesis of two decades of research. The Wallace Foundation. https://www.wallacefoundation.org
  15. Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111116699
  16. Hallinger, P. (2020). Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218809298
  17. Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659–689. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209340042
  18. Hersey, P., Blanchard, K. H., & Johnson, D. E. (2012). Management of organizational behavior: Leading human resources (10th ed.). Pearson.
  19. Klar, H. W., & Brewer, C. A. (2013). Successful leadership in high-needs schools: An examination of core leadership practices enacted in challenging contexts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(5), 768–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13482577
  20. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565829
  21. Liu, Y., Wang, H., & Li, X. (2022). Leadership congruence and team effectiveness: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 29(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518211010590
  22. Northouse, P. G. (2019). Leadership: Theory and practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
  23. Nguyen, D., Ng, D., & Le, T. T. (2021). Instructional leadership in Vietnam: Practices and challenges of school leaders. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2019.1671802
  24. OECD. (2020). School leadership for learning: Insights from TALIS 2018. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/12091401
  25. Quin, J., Deris, A., Bischoff, G., & Johnson, J. T. (2015). The relationship between principal leadership and teacher morale. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 10(2), 1–22. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1071390
  26. Saiti, A., & Saitis, C. (2021). The role of school leaders in times of crisis: COVID-19 experience. International Studies in Educational Administration, 49(1), 6–17.
  27. Sebastian, J., Huang, H., & Allensworth, E. (2017). The role of teacher leadership in how principals influence classroom instruction and student learning. American Journal of Education, 123(1), 69–108. https://doi.org/10.1086/688169
  28. Sharma, S., & Mehta, D. (2018). Role of leadership in school performance: A critical analysis. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(5), 843–859. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2016-0234.
  29. Tschannen-Moran, M. (2014). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.