Home⇛Business Research Journal⇛vol. 9 no. 1 (2023)

Online Learning in a Philippine State University: What Matters Most?

Ronel Sapungan

 

Abstract:

Implementing online learning in the Philippine state universities and colleges during the COVID-19 times has been a tremendous concern among the administrators, educators, and students. Perceived learning problems between students and the course content and interactions with their instructors and peers were evident as revealed in empirical observations and studies. The condition posed challenges to both instructors and students. Thus, this qualitative constructivist-interpretative case study with a semi-structured interview was conducted with the primary objective of describing the students’ perception and experiences of online learning as described in Moore’s Transactional Distance Theory. Using predictive data analytics, this study revealed that the majority of the respondents believed that their interactions with the course content and instructors were essential but with less agreement with student-student interactions. Based on the findings, the researcher concluded that online learning, the methods of content delivery, interactions with course content, and instructors met most of the students’ expectations. The participants also confirmed that positive traits and habits (student character) were most important to survive online learning and thrive in virtual environments. Hence, it is recommended that the university administrators should provide more sufficient supports (training, administrative, monetary, and promotional), hire more qualified faculty, and motivate faculty to provide rich, sustainable, and effective online teaching program.



References:

  1. Abongo, S. (2017). The effect of budgeting process on the financial performance of top 100 small and medium firms in Kenya [Master’s thesis, University of Nairobi]. http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/106376
  2. Aditi. (2016). How Internet is making learning easier. Toppr Bytes. https://www.toppr.com/bytes/internet-making-learning-easier/
  3. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group, Babson College.
  4. Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., Lederman, D., & Jaschik, S. (2012). Conflicted: Faculty and online education, 2012. Inside Higher Ed. http://www.insidehighered.com/sites/default/server_files/files/IHE-BSRG-Conflict.pdf
  5. Alquarashi, E. (2018). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 39(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562
  6. Arthur-Nyarko, E., & Kariuki, M. G. (2019). Learner access to resources for eLearning and preference for eLearning delivery mode in distance education programmes in Ghana. International Journal of Educational Technology, 6(2), 1–8.
  7. Baker, G. (2010). The impact of instructor immediacy and presence for online student affective learning, cognition, and motivation. The Journal of Educators Online, 7(1), 1–30. http://www.anitacrawley.net/Articles/BakerPaper.pdf
  8. Barrot, J. S., Llenares, I. I., & del Rosario, L. S. (2021). Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 7321–7338.
  9. Bartleby. (2021). Online learning: The benefits of online and mobile learning. https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Online-Learning-The-Benefits-Of-Online-And-PCXCQME26
  10. Benckert, S., Högström, P., & Ottander, C. (2010). Lab work and learning in secondary school chemistry: The importance of teacher and student interaction. Research in Science Education, 40(4), 505–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9131-3
  11. Berge, Z. L. (1998). Barriers to online teaching in post-secondary institutions. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 1(2). http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer12/berge12.html
  12. Bornt, D. (2011). Instructional design models, theories & methodology: Moore’s theory of transactional distance. https://k3hamilton.com/LTech/transactional.html
  13. Chemosit, C. C., & Rugutt, J. K. (2021). Student collaborative learning strategies: A logistic regression analysis approach. In Handbook of Research on Innovations in Non-Traditional Educational Practices (pp. 20–33). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4360-3.ch018
  14. Chou, C., Peng, H., & Chang, C. Y. (2010). The technical framework of interactive functions for course-management systems: Students’ perceptions, uses, and evaluations. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1004–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.011
  15. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  16. Dabbagh, N. (2016). The online learner: Characteristics and pedagogical implications. George Mason University. https://citejournal.org/volume-7/issue-3-07/general/the-online-learner-characteristicsand-pedagogical-implications
  17. Elaish, M., Shuib, L., Ghani, N., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2019). Mobile English language e-learning (MELL): A literature review. Educational Review, 71(2), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2017.1382445
  18. Fawaz, M., Al Nakhal, M., & Itani, M. (2021). COVID-19 quarantine stressors and management among Lebanese students: A qualitative study. Current Psychology, 1–8.
  19. Garcia, R. (2019). How to keep students organized and thriving in a digital classroom. EdSurge. https://www.edsurge.com/news/2019-10-14-how-to-keep-studentsorganizedand-thriving-in-a-digital-classroom
  20. Gergen, K. J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. SAGE Publications.
  21. Gillingham, M., & Molinari, C. (2012). Online courses: Student preferences survey. Internet Learning, 1(1), 36–44. http://digitalcommons.apus.edu/internetlearning/vol1/iss1/4
  22. Gillis, A., & Krull, L. M. (2020). COVID-19 remote learning transition in spring 2020: Class structures, student perceptions, and inequality in college courses. Teaching Sociology, 48(4), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X20954263
  23. Giossos, Y., Koutsouba, M., Lionarakis, A., & Skavantzos, K. (2009). Reconsidering Moore’s transactional distance theory. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 2009(2), 1–6. http://www.eurodl.org/?article=374
  24. Joaquin, J. J. B., Biana, H. T., & Dacela, M. A. D. (2020). The Philippine higher education sector in the time of COVID-19. Frontiers in Education. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2020.576371/full
  25. Jones, C. R. (2017). Examination of online community college students: Community of inquiry theoretical model [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
  26. Khalil, R., Mansour, A. E., Fadda, W. A., Almisnid, K., Aldamegh, M., Al-Nafeesah, A., & Al-Wutayd, O. (2020). The sudden transition to synchronized online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia: A qualitative study exploring medical students’ perspectives. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1–10.
  27. Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 16–39. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1008076.pdf
  28. Lapsley, D. K., & Narvaez, D. (2006). Character education (Vol. 4). Wiley.
  29. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
  30. Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
  31. Meratas. (2020). Challenges students face with online learning and how to overcome them. https://meratas.com/blog/5-challenges-students-face-with-remote-learning/
  32. Moore, M. G. (1997). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–38). Routledge.
  33. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
  34. Murray, M. C., Perez, J., Geist, D., & Hedrick, A. (2013). Student interaction with content in online and hybrid courses: Leading horses to the proverbial water. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 16, 99–115. http://www.inform.nu/Articles/Vol16/ISJv16p099-115MurrayFT114.pdf
  35. Nishimwe, A., et al. (2022). Assessing the perceptions and preferences between online and in-person classroom learning among university students in Rwanda. Journal of Service Science and Management, 15(1). https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers.aspx?referenceid=3175975
  36. O’Neill, K., Singh, G., & Donoghue, J. (2004). Implementing eLearning programmes for higher education: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 3, 313–323. https://doi.org/10.28945/304
  37. Orlando, J. (2017). What research tells us about online discussion. Faculty Focus. https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/online-education/research-tells-us-online-discussion/
  38. Paechter, M., Maier, B., & Macher, D. (2010). Students’ expectations of and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computers & Education, 54, 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.005
  39. Picciano, A. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21–40.
  40. Rau, M. A., Kennedy, K., Oxtoby, L., Bollom, M., & Moore, J. W. (2017). Unpacking “active learning”: A combination of flipped classroom and collaboration support is more effective but collaboration support alone is not. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(10), 1406–1414.
  41. Ryan, S. (2001). Is online learning right for you? American Agent & Broker, 73, 54–58.
  42. Sapungan, R. M., & Tordecilla, S. M. (2022). Exploring flexible and alternative learning mode in the new normal. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 5(3), 1–10.
  43. Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C. H. (2010). New approaches to qualitative research: Wisdom and uncertainty. Routledge.
  44. Seifert, K., & Sutton, R. (2017). Enhancing student learning through a variety of resources. Educational Psychology. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/educationalpsychology/chapter/enhancing-student-learning-through-a-variety-of-resources/
  45. Simbulan, N. (2020). The Philippines – COVID-19 and its impact on higher education in the Philippines. Human Capital and Education for Asian Development. https://headfoundation.org/HESB8/covid-19-and-its-impact-on-higher-education-in-the-philippines/
  46. Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, 43(6), 51–54.
  47. Suryaman, M., et al. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and home online learning system: Does it affect the quality of pharmacy school learning? Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11, 524–530.
  48. Sun, H. L., et al. (2022). The influence of teacher–student interaction on the effects of online learning: Based on a serial mediating model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 779217. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.779217
  49. UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO warns 117 million students around the world are still out of school. https://en.unesco.org/news/unesco-warns-117-million-students-around-world-are-still-out-school
  50. Van der Walt, L. (2020). Interpretive quantification: Methodological explorations for critical and constructivist IR. University of Michigan Press. https://books.google.com.ph/books?
  51. Yu-Chang, H., Yu-Hui, C., Mathews, J. P., & Carr-Chellman, A. (2009). Undergraduate students’ self-regulated learning experience in web-based learning environments. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(2), 109–121.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic