Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 7 (2025)

Boosting Students' ICT Proficiency through Edu-Graphics: An Enhanced Approach in Productivity Software Instruction

Joyce Kringle C. Bongalos | Abraham S. Accad

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

In the digital age, proficiency in productivity software is vital for students' academic and professional success. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the Edu-Graphics approach—a multimedia instructional strategy that integrates graphic design and cognitive principles—in improving ICT proficiency among Grade 8 students at New Pangasinan National High School. A proper experimental design was used, involving a control group that received traditional instruction and an experimental group that used a validated Edu-Graphics module. The module was assessed for Content, Relevance, Instructional Quality, and Presentation. Pre-test results confirmed that both groups were at a novice proficiency level, with no statistically significant differences: p-values were 0.13 for Word Processing, 0.21 for Presentation Software, 1.00 for Spreadsheet Software, and 0.16 for the Total Score. Post-test results revealed a significant improvement in the experimental group, which reached a competent level across all software categories. The experimental group achieved a total mean score of 3.25 (SD = 0.69), significantly higher than the control group’s 1.84 (SD = 0.39), with p-values < 0.00001 in all areas. Furthermore, the experimental group recorded a mean gain score of 2.10 (SD = 0.68), compared to the control group’s 0.76 (SD = 0.36). T-values ranged from 9.60 to 10.77, confirming statistically significant improvement (p < 0.00001) in Word Processing, Presentation, and Spreadsheet Software skills. These findings affirm the effectiveness of the Edu-Graphics approach in enhancing students’ digital proficiency. By offering visually enriched, learner-centered, and self-paced instruction, the strategy supports varied learning styles and increases engagement. Edu-Graphics demonstrates strong potential as a scalable tool for integrating technology-driven instruction into the basic education curriculum.



References:

  1. Afzal, A., Khan, S., Daud, S., Ahmed, Z., & Butt, A. (2023). Addressing the digital divide: Access and use of technology in education. Journal of Social Sciences Research, 3(2), 883–895. https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v3i2.326
  2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social cognitive theory (SCT). School of Public Health. Retrieved from https://encr.pw/HmeT0
  3. Barcelona, K. E., Daling, B., Doria, P., Balangiao, S., Mailes, M., Chiang, P., & Ubatay, D. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of TLE teachers in Philippine public schools: An inquiry. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 4, 44–60. https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0247
  4. Batinga, E. M., Jubay, R. J., & Avilla, R. A. (2020). Enhancing students’ metacognition and reading comprehension using graphic organizers. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3731200
  5. Dela Roca, C. K. J., & Cardano, M. R. (2024). Katangian at kasanayan sa paggamit ng mga aplikasyong productivity software ng mga mag-aaral sa kolehiyo. Ignatian International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 2(4), 1375–1401. https://doi.org/10.17613/y29z-wn36
  6. Duggal, H. K., Khatri, P., Thomas, A., & Pironti, M. (2024). Changing learning paradigms: An interplay of digital Taylorism and technostress on perceived employability. Journal of Management History, 30(2), 166–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-12-2022-0089
  7. Duterte, J. P. (2024). Technology-enhanced learning environments: Improving engagement and learning. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VIII(X), 1305–1314. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2024.8100111
  8. Enakrire, R. T. (2024). The usefulness of computer skills for enhanced teaching and learning among lecturers in an open distance e-learning (ODEL) environment. Education and Information Technologies, 29(13), 16597–16612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12519-z
  9. Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., & Fernández-Cerero, J. (2022). Are primary education teachers trained to use the technology with disabled students? Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17. https://rptel.apsce.net/index.php/RPTEL/article/view/2022-17019
  10. Fouda, B. (2019). The effectiveness of integrating graphic elements into e-learning. IDJ, 9(2), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.21608/idj.2019.83432
  11. Idris, B. I., & Abubakar, A. U. (2023). Effects of interactive multimedia instruction on students’ academic achievement and retention in computer studies in Federal College of Education, Zaria. SAPIENTIA FOUNDATION JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, SCIENCES AND GENDER STUDIES, 5(2). https://tinyurl.com/5c3r277t
  12. Kilag, O. K. T., Segarra, G. B., De Gracia, A. M. L., Del Socorro, A. S., Abendan, C. F. K., Camangyan, G. A., & Mahasol, E. T. (2023). ICT application in teaching and learning. Science and Education, 4(2), 854–865.
  13. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: Fourth Edition (pp. 101–111). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9
  14. Koehler, M., Greenhalgh, S., Rosenberg, J., & Keenan, S. (2017). What the tech is going on with teachers’ digital teaching portfolios? Using the tpack framework to analyze teachers’ technological understanding. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(1), 31–59. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1130986&utm
  15. Li, L. (2024). Reskilling and upskilling the future-ready workforce for industry 4. 0 and beyond. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(5), 1697–1712. https://tinyurl.com/kaecrvxn
  16. Lloyd, J. E. (2024). The impact of well-designed graphics and multimedia on student engagement and learning in online classes (Doctoral dissertation). University of Central Florida.
  17. Magadza, I., & Mampane, J. (2024). Experiences of adult educators in selecting appropriate teaching methods in engineering courses at TVET colleges in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2024.2330070
  18. Magallanes, K. J. D., Carreon, M. B. C., Miclat, K. C., Salita, N. V. V., Sumilhig, G. A., Guevarra, R. C. C., & Miranda, J. P. P. (2024). Perceived importance of ICT proficiency for teaching, learning, and career progression among physical education teachers in Pampanga (No. arXiv:2407.11366). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.11366
  19. Majumdar, S. (2015). Emerging trends in ICT for education and training. Director General, Asia & Pacific Region IVETA, 1–13. https://encr.pw/Rh8r2
  20. Malik, R. (2018). Educational challenges in the 21st century and sustainable development. Journal of Sustainable Development Education and Research, 2(1), 9–15. https://encr.pw/2ZG5r
  21. Mayer, R. E. (2017). Using multimedia for e-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12197
  22. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2005). A cognitive theory of multimedia learning: Implications for design principles. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 91, 1–45. https://l1nq.com/Si3b0
  23. Olipas, C. N. P. (2023). Students’ evaluation of the instructional learning modules for the application development and emerging technologies course. Puissant, 4, 1074–1089. https://encr.pw/etEKU
  24. Olipas, N. C. N. P., Cochanco, N. R. A. G., & Cochanco, N. A. S. (2023). Role of graphic organizers in bridging the gap between theory and practice in engineering education. Education Journal, 2(2), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.5810/ej.2023.7.2.073
  25. Panda, S. (2024). Editorial: Improving learning through ODL: The importance of instructional design and student engagement. Journal of Learning for Development, 11(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v11i1.1404
  26. Pifarré, M., & Argelagós, E. (2020). Embedded information problem-solving instruction to foster learning from digital sources: Longitudinal effects on task performance. Sustainability, 12(19), 7919. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197919
  27. Robillos, R. J. (2023). Effect of metacognitive-based digital graphic organizer on learners’ oral presentation skill and self-regulation of learning awareness. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16334a
  28. Rodriguez, C. F., & Habla, F. A. (2023). Learning continuity in technology and livelihood education (TLE) instruction through information and communication technology (ICT) integration. (UIJRT). 5(4), 29-43. https://encr.pw/dMsBU
  29. Sahab, Q. A. A. N. M. (2022). The effectiveness of using interactive multimedia on the learning process for enhancing the connection between education and practice. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7271194
  30. Shaughnessy, J. J., Zechmeister, E. B., & Zechmeister, J. S. (2009). Research methods in psychology (8th ed.). McGraw‑Hill.
  31. Shen, Y. (2024). Examining the efficacies of instructor‐designed instructional videos in flipped classrooms on student engagement and learning outcomes: An empirical study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12987
  32. Stamov Roßnagel, C., Fitzallen, N., & Lo Baido, K. (2020). Constructive alignment and the learning experience: Relationships with student motivation and perceived learning demands. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(4), 838–851. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1787956
  33. Sucion, R. B., Subillaga, R. D., & Ambayon, C. M. (2021). Powercoaching program and oral discourse competence of grade 10 students. International Journal of Educational Technology and Learning, 10(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.20448/2003.101.1.7
  34. Sweller, J. (2019). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3
  35. Turčáni, M., Balogh, Z., & Kohútek, M. (2024). Evaluating computer science students’ reading comprehension of educational multimedia-enhanced text using scalable eye-tracking methodology. Smart Learn Environ, 11, 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00318-5
  36. Tutor Doctor (2017). Challenges facing rural education. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/5n6cn5nu
  37. Vijitha, R. (2024). Impact of technology exposure on student learning skills. International Journal of Science Engineering and Technology, 12(6), 1–10. https://tinyurl.com/bdc9dv2d.
  38. Volmer, R. (2023). Unpacking the advantages and disadvantages of rural education (Bachelor’s capstone project). California State University. https://tinyurl.com/2xrnsma2

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic