Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 7 (2025)

How Family and Self-View Affect Unvisited Persons Deprived of Liberty

Micaella Jaenna F. Aquino | Nathan Danedith E. Benedicto | Khatrhin Elloisse DG Figuracion | Psamuel B. Viernes | Joseph A Villarama

Discipline: social sciences (non-specific)

 

Abstract:

Unvisited persons deprived of liberty (PDLs) face internal challenges that shape their well-being and behavior within correctional facilities, often leading to societal misinterpretations. This study investigated the self-perception and familial connections of unvisited PDLs, aiming to foster a more profound understanding of this marginalized group. Through a phenomenological approach grounded in labeling and narrative theories, the research collected insights from 20 unvisited PDLs purposefully selected across age groups at a correctional facility in Nueva Ecija, Philippines. Using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis, five recurring themes emerged. Results indicate that unvisited PDLs view family as a crucial support system during incarceration; yet, the absence of family visitation has profound impacts, generating negative thoughts that weigh heavily on their emotional and psychological wellness. Coping mechanisms enable unvisited PDLs to manage these emotions and build resilience throughout incarceration. Participants also identified labels and stigmas they experience, highlighting society’s pervasive misconceptions about unvisited inmates. Despite often being overlooked, unvisited PDLs express a strong desire for societal empathy and understanding. This study underscores the importance of family presence in the lives of incarcerated individuals and reveals the detrimental effects of societal stigma on their mental health and self-worth. In response, it calls for society and legal systems to enact supportive initiatives that strengthen rehabilitation and reintegration pathways for unvisited PDLs, fostering a more inclusive and empathetic community.



References:

  1. Ahmed, A. M. (2015). Prison, stigma, discrimination and personality as predictors of criminal recidivism: Preliminary findings. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 6(2), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.22610/jsds.v6i2.838
  2. Ai, A. L., Raney, A. A., Paloutzian, R. F., Lemieux, C. M., & Huang, B. (2022). Spiritual coping, emotional responses to existential challenges, and character strengths: revision and validation of the using private prayer for coping scale (UPPC-R). The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 32(4), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2022.2029069
  3. Bartlett, T. and Eriksson, A. (2018). How fathers construct and perform masculinity in a liminal            prison space. Punishment   &   Society, 21(3), 275-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474518757092
  4. Boag, E. M., & Wilson, D. (2014). Inside experience: Engagement empathy and prejudice towards prisoners. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 4(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcp-06-2013-0016
  5. Brandner, T. (2020). ‘The Room is Small, but the Heart is Big’—Religion and Community Life in Philippine Prisons. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 21(4), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2020.1797154
  6. Burns, D., Murray, C., Ferguson, J., & Moore, L. (2024). The experiences of men in prison who do not receive visits from family or friends: A qualitative systematic review. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.2332
  7. Claire, K. & Dixon, L. (2016). The effects of prison visits from family members on prisoners’ well-being, prison rule breaking, and recidivism. Trauma Violence & Abuse, 18(2), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838015603209
  8. Cochran, J. C., & Mears, D. P. (2013). Social isolation and inmate behavior: a conceptual framework for theorizing prison visitation and guiding and assessing research. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.05.001
  9. Cochran, J. C., Mears, D. P., & Bales, W. (2014). Who gets visited in prison? individual- and community-level disparities in inmate visitation experiences. Crime & Delinquency, 63(5), 545–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128714542503
  10. Convery, U., & Moore, L. (2021). Living with the pains of confinement: The experiences of children with parents in prison in Northern Ireland. In Parental Imprisonment and Children’s Rights (pp. 22–43). Routledge. https://tinyurl.com/jnzb4vh8
  11. Crewe, B., & Bennett, J. (Eds.). (2012). The prisoner. Routledge. https://tinyurl.com/nhe82ecw
  12. De Guzman, A. B., Garcia, A. C. R., Garcia, M. D., & Garcia, R. J. B. (2021). Older Filipino Prisoners’ Fear of Other Inmates: a Grounded Theory Analysis. Ageing international, 46, 422-436. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12126-020-09397-4
  13. Dolcos, F., Hohl, K., Hu, Y., & Dolcos, S. (2021). Religiosity and resilience: Cognitive reappraisal and coping self-efficacy mediate the link between religious coping and well-being. Journal of religion and health, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-020-01160-y
  14. Flores-Barolo, M. G., & Vicente, J. B. (2019). Challenges and coping mechanisms of persons deprived of liberty of sablayan prison and penal farm in the Philippines. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 8(11), 49–97. https://tinyurl.com/5h7wws8b
  15. Flynn, C., Bartels, L., Dennison, S., Taylor, H., & Harrigan, S. (2021). Contact experiences and needs of children of prisoners before and during covid‐19: findings from an australian survey. Child & Family Social Work, 27(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12873
  16. Folk, J., Stuewig, J., Mashek, D., Tangney, J., & Grossmann, J. (2019). Behind bars but connected to family: evidence for the benefits of family contact during incarceration. Journal of Family Psychology, 33(4), 453-464. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000520
  17. Garland, B., Wodahl, E., & Schuhmann, R. (2013). Value conflict and public opinion toward prisoner reentry initiatives. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24(1), 27-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403411424081
  18. Gessa, G., Glaser, K., & Tinker, A. (2015). The health impact of intensive and nonintensive grandchild care in europe: new evidence from share. The Journals of Gerontology Series B, 71(5), 867–879. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv055
  19. Gonzalez, G. (2021). Who has the power? Manipulating and reclaiming social support in solitary confinement. Punishment & Society, 146247452110293. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745211029362
  20. Gruevska-Drakulevski, A. (2017). Labelling Theory-One of the Major Criminology Theories: Underlying Principles and Ideas, Main Assumed Mechanisms and Hypothesis, Critical Points.            Iustinianus Primus L. Rev., 8, 1. https://tinyurl.com/4ybwxj8z
  21. Holligan, C. (2016). An absent presence: Visitor narratives of journeys and support for prisoners during imprisonment. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 55(1-2), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12153
  22. Hutton, M. (2018). The legally sanctioned stigmatisation of prisoners families. Prisoners, punishment, and the family: towards a new sociology of punishment, 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198810087.001.0001
  23. Ilano, J. B. (2017). Preferential Treatment: An Avenue For Decay In Prisons (A Comparative Analysis With India And the Philippines). International Conference on Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences. http://uruae.org/siteadmin/upload/ED0117315.pdf.
  24. Jones, C., & Morales, R. S. (2012). Integration versus segregation: A preliminary examination of Philippine correctional facilities for de-radicalization. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 35(3), 211-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610x.2012.648157
  25. Jones, C., & Narag, R. (2019). How inmates help run Philippine prisons. Current History, 118(811), 298-303. https://tinyurl.com/bd3d3h3x
  26. Jones, C., Narag, R., & Morales, R. (2015). Philippine prison gangs: Control or chaos?. RegNet Research Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2586912
  27. Kaplan, J. M., & Winther, R. G. (2013). Prisoners of abstraction? The theory and measure of genetic variation, and the very concept of “race”. Biological theory, 7, 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-012-0048-0
  28. Karamalidou, A., & Karamalidou, A. (2017). English and Dutch Prisons: ‘Contrasts in Tolerance’. Embedding Human Rights in Prison: English and Dutch Perspectives, 17-35. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58502-8_2
  29. Kupers, T., Polizzi, D., Braswell, M., & Draper, M. (2014). Mutual respect and effective prison management. Transforming corrections: Humanistic approaches to corrections and offender treatment, 159–171. https://tinyurl.com/4ejxmkjr
  30. Laurent, M., Lions, C., Malderen, S., Schiltz, J., Vanderplasschen, W., Holm, K., … & Stöver, H. (2015). Insufficient access to harm reduction measures in prisons in 5 countries (pride europe): a shared european public health concern. BMC Public Health, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2421-y
  31. Mann, N. (2016). Doing harder time?: The experiences of an ageing male prison population in England and Wales. Routledge. https://tinyurl.com/2pfvnxvd
  32. Markussen, T., & Knutz, E. (2020). Playing games to re-story troubled family narratives in danish maximum-security prisons. Punishment & Society, 22(4), 483-508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474520915748
  33. Maschi, T., Viola, D., & Koskinen, L. (2015). Trauma, stress, and coping among older adults in prison: Towards a human rights and intergenerational family justice action agenda. Traumatology, 21(3), 188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/trm0000021
  34. McGinley, M., & Jones, C. (2018). Growing up with parental imprisonment: children’s experiences of managing stigma, secrecy and shame.  Practice, 30(5), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2018.1450497
  35. Michel, L., Lions, C., Van Malderen, S., Schiltz, J., Vanderplasschen, W., Holm, K., & Stöver, H. (2015). Insufficient access to harm reduction measures in prisons in 5 countries (PRIDE Europe): a shared European public health concern. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2421-y
  36. Micklethwaite, D. (2022). The Contradictions of Prisoner Life and Rehabilitation: An Auto-ethnographic Life Sentence Experience. Journal of Prisoners on Prisons, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.18192/jpp.v31i1.6442
  37. Mitchell, S., Rosa, N., Cary, J., & Sparks, S. (2021). Considering the impact of COVID-19 on suicide risk among individuals in prison and during reentry. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 11(3), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcp-10-2020-0044
  38. Monahan, K. C., Goldweber, A., & Cauffman, E. (2011). The effects of visitation on incarcerated juvenile offenders: How contact with the outside impacts adjustment on the inside. Law and human behavior, 35, 143–151. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10979-010-9220-x
  39. Morillo, H. M., Capuno, J. J., & Mendoza, A. M. (2013). Views and values on family among Filipinos: An empirical exploration. Asian Journal of Social Science, 41(1), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685314-12341278
  40. Narag, R. E., & Jones, C. (2020). The kubol effect: Shared governance and cell dynamics in an overcrowded prison system in the Philippines. The Prison Cell: Embodied and Everyday Spaces of Incarceration, 71-94. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-39911-5_4
  41. Narag, R. E., & Jones, C. R. (2017). Understanding prison management in the Philippines: A case   for   shared   governance. The   Prison   Journal,  97(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885516679366
  42. Narag, R. E., & Lee, S. (2018). Putting out fires: Understanding the developmental nature and roles of inmate gangs in the Philippine overcrowded jails. International journal of offender therapy and            comparative criminology, 62(11), 3509–3535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x17744726
  43. Noel, M. E., & Green, C. (2021). “I Literally Roll With The Punches”: Black and Latinx Women Coping Through Parental        Incarceration. CrimRxiv. https://doi.org/10.21428/88de04a1.a9c93b41
  44. Onwuchekwe, S. I., Ibekwe, C. C., Ezeh, S. S., & Okpala, F. C. (2023). Public Perception of Ex-Convicts Reintegration in Idemili-North Local Government Area of Anambra State, Nigeria. Journal of Law and Judicial System, 6(1),15-29. https://doi.org/10.22259/2637-5893.0601002
  45. Osayi, K. K. (2015). Socio-Cultural Factors Affecting Reintegration of Discharged Prisoners in Anambra State, South East, Nigeria. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.7763/IJSSH 2015.V5.418
  46. Paterline, B. A., & Orr, D. (2016). Adaptation to Prison and Inmate Self-Concept. Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Science, 4(2), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.15640/jpbs.v4n2a6
  47. Puckett, K. (2016). Narrative theory. Cambridge University Press.
  48. Roberts, A., Onwumere, J., Forrester, A., Huddy, V., Byrne, M., Campbell, C., & Valmaggia, L. (2016). Family intervention in a prison environment: a systematic literature review. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 27(4), 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.2001
  49. Rocheleau, A. M. (2015). Ways of coping and involvement in prison violence. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 59(4), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X13510275
  50. Saguran, J. B., Cano, J. C., Llantos, E. P., Esnardo, J. E., Banac, A. C., Gabon, M. G., & Tagle, A. A. Behind Locked Doors: Understanding the Lived Experiences of Persons Deprived of Liberty in Detention and Correctional Facilities. International Journal of Science and Management Studies, 6(3), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v6i3p117
  51. Salihu, H. A. (2018). Perceived Socio-Cultural Factors Affecting the Re-integration of Discharged Prisoners: A Case Study of Ilorin Emirate. KIU Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 35-47. https://ijhumas.com/ojs/index.php/kiujoss/article/view/328
  52. Schuhmann, C., Kuis, E., & Goossensen, A. (2018). “Purely for you”: Inmates’ perceptions of prison visitation by volunteers in the Netherlands. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(14), 4545–4564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x18764523
  53. Sharratt, K. (2014). Children’s experiences of contact with imprisoned parents: a comparison between four european countries. European Journal of Criminology, 11(6), 760–775. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370814525936
  54. Shuja, K. H., & Abbas, J. (2022). Criminal Recidivism in Pakistan: A Grounded Theory of Social & Environmental Causes and Psychological Consequences. Nature-Nurture Journal of Psychology, 2(2), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.53107/nnjp.v2i2.6
  55. Siennick, S. E., Mears, D. P., & Bales, W. D. (2013). Here and Gone: Anticipation and Separation Effects of Prison Visits on Inmate Infractions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50(3), 417-444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427812449470
  56. Sjöström, S. (2017). Labelling theory. In Routledge international handbook of critical mental health (pp. 15–23). Routledge. https://tinyurl.com/5627ex76
  57. Tate, S., & Wahidin, A. (2013). Extraneare: Pain, loneliness, and the incarcerated female body. Illness, Crisis & Loss, 21(3), 203-217. https://doi.org/10.2190/il.21.3.c
  58. Testoni, I., Nencioni, I., Arbien, M., Iacona, E., Marrella, F., Gorzegno, V., … & Wieser, M. (2021). Mental health in prison: integrating the perspectives of prison staff. International Journal   of   Environmental   Research   and   Public   Health, 18(21), 11254. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111254
  59. Villarama, J. A., Fabros, B. G., Dilla, V. J., & Valdez, M. S. (2025). Reframing the workplace in a VUCA world: Teaching assistants and their influence on teachers’ efficiency and self-efficacy. International Journal of Education and Practice, 13(1), 158-177. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v13i1.3976
  60. Villarama, J. A., Fabros, B. G., Angeles, C. I., Dela Cruz, L. M. M. V., Dela Fuente, A. V., Concepcion, E. A., … Barcelita, K. J. C. (2024). Knowledge, Practices, And Constraints Among Breastfeeding Employees Towards Implementation Of Lactation Area. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 8(2), 804–819. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v8i2.36402
  61. Villarama, J. A., Fabros, B. G., Cruz, A. T. D., & Valdoz, R. F. V. (2024). ASEAN Engagement’s Impact on Academics and Self-Esteem. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope (IRJMS), 5(4), 242-251. https://doi.org/10.47857/irjms.2024.05i04.01550
  62. Villarama, J. A., Fabros, B. G., Valdez, M. S., & Adsuara, J. P. (2023). Multitasking language and Mathematics educators: Effects on teaching performance in Hyflex environ. International Journal of Learner Diversity and Identities, 30(2), 455-471. https://tinyurl.com/2vynmapp
  63. Villarama, J. A., Santos, J. P. E., Adsuara, J. P., Antalan, J. A. A. R., & Gundran, J. F. (2022). What is on your mind? Impact of online education on students’ mental wellness. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 9(4), 240-248. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v9i4.4243
  64. Villarama, J. A., Santos, J. P. E., Adsuara, J. P., Gundran, J. F., & Castillo, M. E. G. C. (2022). Through the Lens of Virtual Students: Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(10), 109-138. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.10.6
  65. Waller, A. (2016). A Comparison of the American and Scandinavian Criminal Justice Systems. https://repository.tcu.edu/handle/116099117/1980560
  66. Wieczorek, G. (2017). The Family and Relationships during Imprisonment. Pedagogika Rodziny, 7(4), 105-116. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=672347
  67. Wozniak, K. H. (2014). American public opinion about prisons. Criminal Justice Review, 39(3), 305-324.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016814529968

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic