Home⇛ISTRADOR: Research Journal on Education, Technology and Innovation⇛vol. 2 no. 1 (2024)

Teachers’ Teaching Styles And Students’ Academic Performance At Penabur International School, Jakarta, Indonesia: Basis For An Intervention Program

Richard S. Luna

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The objective of this research was to examine the correlation between the academic success of students in Grades 7 and 8 at PENABUR International School in Jakarta, Indonesia, and the instructional techniques employed by their teachers. The research aimed to determine the extent to which teachers utilized various teaching philosophies, the disparities in perception between teachers and students, and the academic performance of the students. Both teachers and students were provided with survey questionnaires as part of a quantitative research approach. The findings revealed significant differences in the opinions of teachers and students regarding teaching approaches. Additionally, the research indicated that teaching methods could potentially impact students' academic achievements, highlighting the need for an intervention program. The study recommends the implementation of frequent feedback mechanisms, teacher training, open and honest conversations between educators and students, among other strategies.



References:

  1. Aboualya, M. A., & Abosnan, S. H. (2022). Effect of teaching style on student's satisfaction and Vocabulary Improvement. المركز العربي الديمقراطي. https://democraticac.de/?p=81998
  2. Adu, E.O. (2020). Teachers’ Perception of Teaching as Correlates of Students’ Academic Performance in Oyo State, Nigeria. https://openriver.winona.edu/eie/vol20/iss1/6/
  3. Aisida, A. (2021). Predicting Students' Academic Performance Using Artificial Neural Network: A Review of Intrinsic and Extraneous Factors. Advances in Multidisciplinary and Scientific Research Journal Publication. https://doi.org/10.22624/aims/abmic2021-v2-p20.
  4. Amep, (2022). Faculty and Students’ Perceptions About Online Teaching Styles of Faculty in Large Group Lectures. Advances in medical education and practice, doi: 10.2147/amep.s377351
  5. Anderson, J. (2023). Updating the expert teacher prototype. Teacher Expertise in the Global South, 221–234. doi:10.1017/9781009284837.010
  6. Anitha, D., Kavitha, D., Prakash, R., & Raja, S.C. (2020). Identification of Opinion Difference in Teaching Learning Methods and Recommendation to Faculty. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations. http://dx.doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2020/v33i0/150197
  7. Avdeeva, I., et.al. (2021). Facilitative Approach to Teaching and Learning. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education (ICSSHE 2021). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211122.150.
  8. Avecilla, P. A., Capiña, X. E., & Javier, A. Y. (2023). Teachers’ teaching style as perceived by students and its influence on students’ level of self-regulation and motivation in learning psychology. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 43, 213–240. doi:10.47577/tssj.v43i1.8693
  9. Banerjee, S. (2020). Autonomous Vehicles: A Review of The Ethical, Social and Economic Implications of The AI Revolution. Emerald Insight. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJIUS- 07-2020-0027
  10. Barberos, M. T., Gozalo, A., & Padayogdog, E. (2019, October 7). The effect of the teacher's teaching style on students' motivation. NYU Steinhardt. https://steinhardt.nyu.edu/departments/teaching-and- learning/research/practitioner-action-research/effect- teachers-teaching
  11. Bekir, S. et.al. (2022). Student–Teacher Relationship Style in School Environment. Filosofiâ, doi: 10.53656/phil 2022-02-05
  12. Bijumon, George, -. (2023). A Literature Review of Cognitive Styles and Parenting Styles among Students. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, doi:10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i02.2561
  13. Bloom, B., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). Revised bloom's taxonomy - online teacher education. https://onlineteachered.mit.edu/files/best- practices/session-2/Handout-Blooms-Taxonomy.pdf
  14. Borch, I., et.al. (2020). Discrepancies in purposes of student course evaluations: what does it mean to be “satisfied”? Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32,83- https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11092-020-09315-x
  15. Burgueño, R., et.al. (2021). Is the instructional style of teacher educators related to the teaching intention of pre-service teachers? A Self-Determination Theory perspective-based analysis. Educational Review, 74, 1282 - 1304. DOI:10.1080/00131911.2021.1890695
  16. Cada, B.A. (2021). Learning Styles & Academic Performance of Teacher Education Students. British Journal of Arts and Humanities. https://doi.org/10.34104/bjah.021086096
  17. Cardenal, M., et al.(2023). Teacher-student relationship and teaching styles in primary education: A model of analysis. Journal of professional capital and community, doi: 10.1108/jpcc-09-2022- 0053
  18. Casinillo, L.F., & Guarte, J.M. (2020). EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TEACHING STRATEGIES: THE CASE OF A NATIONAL VOCATIONAL   SCHOOL   IN   HILONGOS, LEYTE. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3804151
  19. Chandra Handa, M. (2020). Examining Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions of Differentiated Practices, Student Engagement, and Teacher Qualities. Journal of Advanced Academics, 31, 530 - 568. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X20931457
  20. Chetty, N. D. S., Handayani, L., Sahabudin, N. A., Ali, Z., Hamzah, N., Rahman, N. S. A., & Kasim, S. (2019). Learning styles and teaching styles determine students' academic performances. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1238274
  21. Chiu, A. et.al(2021). Connecting teacher and student motivation: Student-perceived teacher need-supportive practices and student need satisfaction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 64, 101950. DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101950
  22. Codina, N. et. al. (2020). Preventing Procrastination Behaviors: Teaching Styles and Competence in University Students. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062448.
  23. Common Goal Systems Inc. (n.d.). What is standards-based grading? TeacherEase. https://www.teacherease.com/standards-based- grading.aspx
  24. Couture, E. (2023). How different teaching Styles affect learning. https://medium.com/@etiennecouture1982/how-different- teaching -styles-affect-learning-9291014d7c9f
  25. Dash, N., et.al. (2020). Preferred teaching styles of medical faculty: an international multi-center study. BMC Medical Education, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02358-0.
  26. Datatab, (2024) Cronbach's Alpha. https://datatab.net/tutorial/cronbachs-alpha
  27. Dimar, (2022). Penilaian Kinerja Guru di Sekolah Dasar Antara Tantangan dan Peluang. doi:10.58577/dimar.v4i1.64
  28. Eckhaus, E., & Davidovitch, N. (2019). Potential for Blocking Advancement: Teaching Surveys for Student Evaluation of Lecturers. International Journal of Educational Methodology. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.3.401
  29. Eslit, E. R., Tongson, M. B. (2018). Teaching Styles and Language Performance. Towards a Development of an English Language Program. Germany: Bod Third Party Titles. http://www.google.ca/books/edition/Teaching_Styles_and_Language_Performance/-GnBwQEACAAJ?hl=en
  30. Ferdinandi, C.et.al (2023). The influence of educational leadership on students’ academic performance in secondary schools: A case of Itilima district. Electronic Journal of Education, Social Economics and Technology, doi: 10.33122/ejeset.v4i1.100
  31. Fernández-García, C., et al. (2021). University students and their perception of teaching effectiveness. Effects on students’ engagement. Revista De Psicodidactica, 26, 62-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2020.11.006
  32. Gerrard, J., & Holloway, J. (2023). Expertise. doi:10.5040/9781350238268
  33. Gill, E. (2020). Teaching styles: Different teaching methods & strategies. ResilientEducator.com https://resilienteducator.com/classroom-resources/5-types-of- classroom-teaching-styles/
  34. Grasha, A. F. (2002). Teaching with style San Bernadino CA: Alliance Publisher
  35. Hayati, N., et.al. (2021). Relationship of Teaching Style Towards to Elementary School Achievement of Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. https://dx.doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v10-i2/9726
  36. Ibarrientos, J. (2021). LEARNING STYLES IN RELATION TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF BTVTED STUDENTS. Journal of English Education and Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.56874/jeel.v2i2.571.
  37. Inayat A. et.al.(2020). Influence of Teaching Style on Students’ Engagement, Curiosity and Exploration in the Classroom. Journal of Education and Educational Development. doi: 10.22555/JOEED.V7I1.2736
  38. Innova Design Group.(2022). How effective are these five teaching styles? Innova Design            Group. https://www.innovadesigngroup.co.uk/news/how-effective- are-these-five-teaching-styles/
  39. Jannah, Z., Roza, V., & Dewi, M. P. (2021). Match and mismatch between learning styles of EFL students and teaching styles of EFL teachers. ELP (Journal of English Language Pedagogy). https://ojs.fkipummy.ac.id/index.php/elp/article/view/358/23 3
  40. Jeon, E. (2023). The Expert English Teachers’ Use of Motivational Strategy and Learning Styles for Teaching Young English Learners. Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction, doi: 10.22251/jlcci.2023.23.7.363
  41. Jiang, J. (2022) ‘Descriptive statistics’, Applied Medical Statistics, pp. 11–51. doi:10.1002/9781119716822.ch2.
  42. Khoirunnisa, F. (2023). Teaching style used by teachers in a private junior high school in Salatiga. dspace. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/42658
  43. Khupavtseva, N. et.al. (2022). PSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO THE ORGANIZATION OF FACILITATIVE INTERACTION AT THE LESSONS OF ENGLISH. Психологія: реальність і перспективи. https://doi.org/10.35619/praprv.v1i18.295.
  44. Klasik, D., & Zahran, W. (2022). The art of sophisticated quantitative description in Higher Education Research. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 649–743. doi:10.1007/978- 3-030-76660-3_12
  45. Kothari, C. R. (2014). Research methodology methods and techniques. New Age International.
  46. Kourgiantakis, T., et.al. (2018). The importance of feedback in preparing social work students for field education - clinical social work journal. SpringerLink. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10615-018-0671-8
  47. Kristianto, I. (2023). The Students’ Perception of the Teacher’s Facilitation in Online Group Work. Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa & Seni Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP https://doi.org/10.33394/jo- elt.v10i1.7163.
  48. Lantseva, T. (2021). INFLUENCE OF LEARNING AND TEACHING STYLE ON STUDENTS' ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE. BULLETIN Series of Pedagogical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.51889/2021-2.1728- 5496.06.
  49. Linsiyah, A. et.al. (2023). The influence of teachers’ professional competence and students’ learning styles on the learning achievement of students. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 6(1), 64–73 doi:10.30605/jsgp.6.1.2023.2391
  50. Lumbre, A., et.al. (2023). Relationship between Mathematics Teachers’ Teaching Styles and Students’ Achievement in Mathematics. Athens Journal of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajs.10-1- 1.
  51. Madsen, S.et.al., (2022). Teacher power and authority: an analysis of exemplar faculty by career stage. Teaching in Higher Education, doi: 10.1080/13562517.2022.2078960
  52. Malay, J. et.al. (2022). Faculty and Students’ Perceptions About Online Teaching Styles of Faculty in Large Group Lectures. Advances in medical education and practice, doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S377351
  53. Markauskaite, L.et.al. (2023). Teaching expertise: an activity system's lens. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.14025-4
  54. Matulac, M. (2016). Teaching style survey (Grasha -Riechmann). Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/26515668/Teaching_Style_Survey_Grasha_Riechmann
  55. Melleno, A., Megan, & Kara. (2015). Lower-order thinking skills - bloom's   taxonomy. Bloom's Taxonomy. https://sites.google.com/site/supersophomores675/l
  56. Miksza, P., Shaw, J. T., Kapalka Richerme, L., Hash, P. M., Hodges, D. A., & Cassidy Parker, E. (2023). Quantitative descriptive and Correlational Research. Music Education Research. doi:10.1093/oso/9780197639757.003.0012
  57. Mobo, F. et.al. (2023). Exploring the Relationship Between Mathematics Performance and Learning Style Among Grade 8 Students. International Journal of Multidisciplinary, doi: 10.11594/ijmaber.04.04.14
  58. Nasution, S. (Suryamuida), 1918 (2006). Metode research: (Penelitian ilmiah) / S. Nasution. Bandung, Bumi Aksara,
  59. Palaroan, R.et.al. (2023). Night Owl vs Early Bird: Students’ Study Habits, Learning Styles and Academic Performance. doi: 10.22492/issn.2432-4604.2023.23
  60. Palumbo, V. et.al. (2022). Exploring student and demonstrator perspectives of the teaching and learning provided by demonstrators during undergraduate laboratory practical sessions. Journal of PGR Pedagogic Practice, doi:10.31273/jppp.vol2.2022.1224
  61. Panezai, Z., et al. (2021). RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRINCIPALS’ LEADERSHIP STYLES AND TEACHERS’ PROFESSIONAL COMMITMENT IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF ZIARAT, BALOCHISTAN. Pakistan Journal of Social Research. Retrieved https://doi.org/10.52567/pjsr.v3i4.277.
  62. Pemerintah Republic Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 57  Tahun  2021-JDIH Kemdikbud. https://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id/arsip/Salinan PP Nomor 57 Tahun 2021.pdf
  63. Perera, C. (2022). Quantitative Data Presentation and Analysis: Descriptive Analysis. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-5017-9_5
  64. Pervin, M.M., Ferdowsh, N., & Munni, I.J. (2021). Teacher-student interactions and academic performance of students. Dhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences, 30, 87-93. https://doi.org/10.3329/dujbs.v30i1.51812
  65. Priya, M. (2021). A study on the preferred teaching styles and factors motivating students. http://dx.doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2021.38353
  66. Rahmah, H. (2023). Teaching Styles Pattern: A Survey of Mathematics Teacher's Preferences in Primary School. Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences, https://doi.org/10.55099/jurmat.v3i1.65
  67. Ranain – Abdulah, N. (2021). Perceived service quality and higher education satisfaction of college students in Panabo City, Philippines. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social            Science,          05(09), 412–417. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2021.5920
  68. Ranaweera, K. G. N. U. (2021). Theories, expectations and gaps: Field research as an effective teaching tool in social sciences. SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3810067
  69. Ravindra, P et.al. (2023). Academic Performance Indicators for Students of Engineering College. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology. https://doi.org/10.48175/ijarsct-14288.
  70. Rezaei, S., & Meshkatian, M. A. (2017). Iranian Teachers’ Attitude towards Using Social Media and Technology to Increase Interaction amongst Students inside or outside the Classroom. www.academypublication.com. https://www.academypublication.com/issues2/tpls/vol07/06/ 02.pdf
  71. Richter, E. et.al. (2021). Teacher educators’ task perception and its relationship to professional identity and teaching practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103303. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2021.103303.
  72. Rollins, M. (2021). Learning style diagnostics: The grasha-riechmann student learning styles scale. eLearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/learning-style-diagnostics- grasha-riechmann-student-learning-styles-scale
  73. Rosidah A. et.al (2022). Penilian kinerja guru di sekolah dasar, antara tantangan dan peluang. Jurnal pendidikan Islam, doi: 10.58577/dimar.v4i1.93
  74. Ryan, R.M. et.al. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self- determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
  75. Saini, D. K., & Sandhiyaa, B. Y. (2019, June 26). Smart city and challenges. SpringerLink . Retrieved April 28, 2023, from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-13-7166- 0_64
  76. Samms, C. (2022). Relationship between Dissimilar Cognitive Styles, Use of Coping Behavior and Use of Learning Strategies. doi:10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.968
  77. Sande, B., & Burnett, C. S. (2023). Designing Learning Environments That Support Diverse Students’ Needs in a Teacher Education Program. IGI Global, DOI:10.4018/IJTEPD.318417
  78. Scales, P. C. et.al. (2020). Effects of developmental relationships with teachers on middle-school students’ motivation and performance- Wiley Online Library. Wiley Online Library. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pits.22350
  79. Schnabel, J.et.al. (2022). Preferred Learning Styles of Graduate Health Science Students and the Effect on Academic Performance. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, doi: 10.5014/ajot.2022.76s1-po118
  80. Shogren, K.A., et. al. (2020). Exploring the Relationship between Student and Teacher/Proxy-Respondent Scores on the Self- Determination Inventory. Exceptionality, 29, 47 - 60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1729764
  81. Sim, S., et.al. (2022). The relationship of Grasha–Riechmann Teaching Styles with teaching experience of National-Type Chinese Primary Schools Mathematics Teacher. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2022.1028145.
  82. Siregar D. et.al (2022). Kinerja dan Kesejahteraan Guru di Pelosok Indonesia. ALSYS, doi: 10.58578/alsys.v2i5.557
  83. Stangor, C., & Walinga, J. (2014). 3.2 psychologists use descriptive, Correlational, and experimental research designs to understand behaviour. Introduction to Psychology 1st Canadian Edition. https://opentextbc.ca/introductiontopsychology/chapter/2-2- psychologists-use-descriptive-correlational-and-experimental- research-designs-to-understand-behavior/
  84. Sugiyono. 2022. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, Bandung, Alfabeta Sukma, F (2022). Teachers’ Pedagogical Competencies and Students’ Performance. doi: 10.19109/literal.v1i1.13088
  85. Tang, W., et. al. (2021). Evaluation Method of Teaching Styles Based on Multi-modal Fusion. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Communication and Information Processing. https://doi.org/10.1145/3507971.3507974.
  86. Torff, B., et.al. (2020). Learning to Be a Responsive, Authoritative Teacher: Effects of Experience and Age on Teachers’ Interactional Styles. The Educational Forum, 85, 77 - 88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2019.1698685.
  87. Vishwanath, M. (2023). Study habits and academic performance among public junior high school students in the Ekumfi district: investigating the controlling effect of learning styles. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies, doi: 10.46827/ejsss.v8i6.1505
  88. Wang, L. and Calvano, L. (2022), "Class size, student behaviors and educational outcomes", Organization Management Journal , Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 126-142. https://doi.org/10.1108/OMJ-01-2021-1139
  89. Werang, B., et.al. (2022). Teacher teaching performance, students’ learning motivation and academic achievement. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i12.7586
  90. Yilmaz, R., et.al. (2023). O022 Real-time artificial intelligence instructor vs expert instruction in teaching of expert level tumour resection skills – a randomized controlled trial. British Journal of Surgery, doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad101.022
  91. Zhao, L., et.al. (2022). A literature review of the research on students’ evaluation of teaching in higher education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13 doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1004487

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic