Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 7 (2025)

Visitors’ Perception of the Importance and Performance of Multisensory Dimensions: The Case of the Philippine National Museum of Natural History

Alvin P. Murillo | Ma. Cristina R. Williams

Discipline: management studies

 

Abstract:

Museums are vital in preserving cultural and historical heritage while offering immersive learning experiences. However, enhancing visitor engagement and satisfaction remains a challenge. This study examines the impact of multisensory dimensions in improving the museum experience at the National Museum of Natural History. Using a quantitative-descriptive approach and purposive sampling of 355 respondents, data were collected through structured questionnaires. The Importance-Performance Analysis Model was applied to assess the significance of visual, auditory, olfactory, and tactile stimuli in shaping visitor experiences. The hypothesis test rejected the null hypothesis, confirming a significant relationship between the perceived importance and the actual performance of multisensory dimensions. Findings indicate that integrating multiple sensory elements enhances visitor engagement, improves recollection of information, and fosters a deeper appreciation of exhibits. These results suggest that aligning sensory features with visitor expectations strengthens interpretation, making museum visits more meaningful and immersive.



References:

  1. Antle, A. N., Tanenbaum, J., Girouard, A., & Robinson, M. (2023). Understanding museum visitors’ engagement with tangible and embodied interaction. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (pp. 1–12). ACM.
  2. Bem, M. J., Chabot, S. R. V., & Braasch, J. (2023). Effects of sounds on the visitors’ experience in museums. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 154(4_supplement), A257. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0023459
  3. Bishop, M. (2017). Inspire: Understanding scent inclusion in museum settings (Master’s thesis). University of Washington. https://tinyurl.com/4bpe5rc3
  4. Bitgood, S. (2014). An attention-value model of museum visitors. Jacksonville State University. https://tinyurl.com/58m999te
  5. Christidou, D., & Pierroux, P. (2018). Art, touch, and meaning making: An analysis of multisensory interpretation in the museum. Museum Management and Curatorship, 34(1), 96–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2018.1516561
  6. Classen, C., Howes, D., & Synnott, A. (1994). Aroma: The cultural history of smell. Routledge.
  7. Cliffe, C., Osden, C., & Holosonics. (2024). Immersive soundscapes: Transforming visitor experiences across iconic exhibits. American Alliance of Museums. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/mwnuyd8p
  8. Coda to Coda. (2023). Natural history museum: Animal interventions. Medium. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/3vxkeesk
  9. Eardley, A. F., Mineiro, C., Neves, J., & Ride, P. (2016). Redefining access: Embracing multimodality, memorability, and shared experience in museums. Curator of the Museum Journal, 59(3), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12163
  10. Ehrich, S. C. (2024). Stimulating the senses: Using smell to engage visitors. Thinking Museum. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/4tdr5752
  11. Elangovan, N., & Padma, C. (2017). Impact of multi-sensory marketing on consumer behaviour in restaurants. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 6(2), 1–9. https://www.ijbmi.org/papers/Vol(6)2/version-4/A0602040109.pdf
  12. Exploratorium. (n.d.). Visit the tactile dome. Retrieved from https://www.exploratorium.edu/visit/tactile-dome
  13. Groth, H. (2020). Literary soundscapes. In A. Snaith (Ed.), Sound and literature (pp. 135–153). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108855532.007
  14. Hayhoe, S., Nolan, C., & Palmer, S. (2022). Co-designing touch: Tactile exhibition design for blind and low-vision visitors. Journal of Museum Education, 47(2), 198–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.2022.2071544
  15. Kokko, T.-E. (2019). Internal and external multisensory branding: A framework and a method for establishing multisensory brand image (Master’s thesis). University of Jyväskylä. https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/64502
  16. Levent, N., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2014). The multisensory museum: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on touch, sound, smell, memory, and space. Rowman & Littlefield.
  17. Luo, D., Doucé, L., & Nys, K. (2024). Multisensory museum experience: An integrative view and future research directions. Museum Management and Curatorship, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2024.2357071
  18. Mansell, J. (2017). A chamber of noise horrors: Sound, technology, and the museum. Science Museum Group Journal, 7(7). https://doi.org/10.15180/170704
  19. Mu, X., Bem, M. J., Chabot, S. R. V., & Braasch, J. (2022). Enhancing museum experiences: The impact of sounds on visitor perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 154(4_supplement), A257. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0023459
  20. Nieuwhof, A. (2016). Olfactory experiences in museums of modern and contemporary art: Smell as a new curatorial strategy (Master’s thesis). Leiden University
  21. Pallasmaa, J. (2014). Space, place, and atmosphere. Emotion and peripheral perception in architectural experience. Lebenswelt. Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.13130/2240-9599/4202
  22. Rogowski, M. (2016). The multi-sensory landscape as an inspiration in the creation of a tourism product. Turyzm/Tourism, 26(2), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1515/tour-2016-0010
  23. Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History. (2020). Sant Ocean Hall. Smithsonian Institution. https://naturalhistory.si.edu/exhibits/sant-ocean-hall
  24. Sound Directions. (2010). Bruce Nauman: Raw materials. Tate Modern. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/trx6f2p7
  25. Spence, C. (2020). Senses of place: Architectural design for the multisensory mind. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00243-4
  26. Vaz, R., Freitas, D., & Coelho, A. (2020). Perspectives of visually impaired visitors on museums: Towards an integrative and multisensory framework to enhance the museum experience. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-Exclusion, 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3439231.3439272
  27. Wang, S. (2020). Museum as a sensory space: A discussion of the communication effect of multi-senses in Taizhou Museum. Sustainability, 12(7), 3061. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073061
  28. Yalowitz, S. S., & Bronnenkant, K. (2009). Timing and tracking: Unlocking visitor behavior. Visitor Studies, 12(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645570902769134.
  29. Ye, H., & Tussyadiah, I. P. (2011). Destination visual image and expectation of experiences. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 28(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2011.545743

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic