HomeJournal of Interdisciplinary Perspectivesvol. 3 no. 7 (2025)

Impact of Pedagogical Strategies on Engagement and Academic Performance in the Filipino Subject

Jonathan P. Roque | Daniela S. Mangansakan | Soffy P. Sandigan

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study explored the impact of various pedagogical strategies on student engagement and academic performance in the Filipino subject among Grade 4 students at Tamnag Central Elementary School. Employing a descriptive-correlational research design, the investigation assessed the effectiveness of cooperative learning, inquiry-based learning, multimedia tools, and experiential teaching approaches. Data were gathered from teachers and students using a validated survey questionnaire and analyzed through descriptive statistics and Pearson’s correlation. The results showed that student-centered and culturally relevant strategies, specifically cooperative, inquiry-based, multimedia-integrated, and experiential approaches, were widely implemented and perceived as effective in enhancing engagement and academic achievement. The study found significant positive correlations between the use of pedagogical strategies and the levels of student engagement and academic performance. These findings underscore the importance of implementing diverse, interactive, and inclusive teaching methods in language instruction. The study offers practical implications for educators, administrators, and policymakers aiming to improve learning outcomes in the Filipino subject and other language disciplines in the elementary education context.



References:

  1. Cheng, M.T., Chen, J.H., Chu, S.J., & Chen, S.Y. (2019). The impact of game-based learning on students’ motivation and learning outcomes in science education: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 22(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12866  
  2. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2015). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification.” In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (pp. 9–22). New York, United States: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2793111 
  3. Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M.P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111 
  4. Gillies, R.M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3 
  5. Keller, M.M., Neumann, K., & Fischer, H.E. (2021). The integration of technology and multimedia tools in language classrooms: Effects on student engagement. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 235–249.
  6. Liu, M. (2018). Cultural integration in language teaching: A study on language engagement in Asian classrooms. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(1), 45–62. 
  7. Slavin, R.E. (2018). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). New York, United States: Routledge. 
  8. Tudge, J.R.H., & Douglass, L. (2017). Lev Vygotsky on education: A cultural–historical, interpersonal, and individual approach to development. Educational Review, 69(1), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315734255-11.
  9. Zhang, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2020). The impact of interactive teaching strategies on student engagement in language education. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(3), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1103.06