Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 3 no. 7 (2025)

Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) Competence and Technology Integration Self-Efficacy Beliefs for Science Teaching

Joey Boy P. Gacayan

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study investigates the level of TPACK competence and technology integration self-efficacy beliefs among junior and senior high school science teachers of Ifugao. While existing research has explored TPACK and self-efficacy in general educational contexts, there is a notable gap in understanding the TPACK competence and technology integration self-efficacy beliefs among science teachers in junior and senior high schools of Ifugao. Using a descriptive-correlational research design, a 4-point modified Likert scale survey questionnaire was employed to gather necessary data from randomly selected one hundred (100) junior and senior high school science teachers in Ifugao. Pearson r, t-test, and ANOVA with Scheffe’s Post-Hoc test were employed to test null hypotheses. Results showed that teachers had demonstrated proficiency in leveraging technology to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes, as evidenced by their experience with TPACK competencies. On the other hand, their technology integration self-efficacy belief was at an expert level, indicating a high level of self-assurance in integrating technology, adapting pedagogical approaches, and delivering science lessons using various digital tools. Additionally, the findings suggest a strong correlation between science teachers' TPACK competence and their self-efficacy beliefs regarding technology integration. Younger science teachers show higher Technological Content Knowledge (TCK) competence than older age groups. The number of training sessions or seminars attended has been proven to be a crucial factor influencing competence in TPACK, technology integration, and self-efficacy beliefs. The results contribute to the growing body of research on TPACK and self-efficacy, highlighting the importance of supporting science teachers in developing their technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge to enhance student learning outcomes. This provides insights into the current state of technology integration in science education in Ifugao and informs recommendations for teacher professional development and educational policy.



References:

  1. Abdullahi, H. (2013). The role of ICT in teaching science education in schools.  International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 19: 217-223. https://doi.org./10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.19.2017
  2. Afful, A., Acquaye, D.O. & Ngman-Wara, E.I.D. (2017). Pre-service science teachers’ competence, self-efficacy beliefs, and readiness levels in ICT integration in teaching Science. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Research, 5(1), 40-50. http://41.74.91.244:8080/handle/123456789/1861
  3. Agustini, K., Santyasa, I. W., & Ratminingsih, N. M. (2019). Analysis of competence on “TPACK”: 21st century teacher professional development. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1387(1), 012035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1387/1/012035
  4. Anderson, S., Griffith, R., & Crawford, L. (2017). TPACK in special education: Pre-service teacher decision-making while integrating iPads into instruction. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 17(1), 97–127. https://tinyurl.com/ybnfy2pn
  5. Antonietti, C., Cattaneo, A., & Amenduni, F. (2022). Can teachers’ digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational education? Computers in Human Behavior, 132, 107266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107266
  6. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  7. Barni, D.; Danioni, F.; Benevene, P. (2019). Teachers’ self-efficacy: The role of personal values and motivations for teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article No. 1645. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01645
  8. Benali, M., Azzimani, T., Kaddouri, M., & Boukare, M. (2018). Compétences numériques chez les futurs enseignants marocains en formation initiale : enjeux épistémologiques. International Journal of Technologies in Higher Education, 15(3), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.18162/ritpu-2018-v15n3-03
  9. Birişçi, S., & Kul, Ü. (2019). Predictors of technology integration self-efficacy beliefs of teacher candidates. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(1), 75-93
  10. Blackwell, C. K., Lauricella, A. R., & Wartella, E. (2014). Factors influencing digital technology use in early childhood education. Computers & Education, 77, 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014
  11. Cankaya, P. (2018). The exploration of the self-efficacy beliefs of English language teachers and student teachers. Journal of Language & Linguistics Studies, 14(3), 12–23. http://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/724/388
  12. Carstens K.J., Mallon, J.M., Bataineh, M. & Al-Bataineh, A. (2021). Effects of technology on student learning. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. Vol. 20 (1) 105–113. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1290791
  13. Chen, S. Y., Hung, C. Y., Chang, Y. C., Lin, Y. S., & Lai, Y. H. (2018). A study on integrating augmented reality technology and game-based learning model to improve motivation and effectiveness on learning English vocabulary, in the 2018 1st International Cognitive Cities Conference (IC3), (Piscataway: IEEE), 24-27. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3.2018.00015 
  14. Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2017). Validating the technology proficiency self-assessment for 21st Century learning (TPSA C21) instrument. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2016.1242391 
  15. Christopherson, K.A.; Elstad, E.; Turmo, A.; Solhaug, T. (2016). Teacher education programmes and their contribution to student teacher efficacy in classroom management and pupil engagement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60, 240–254. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1090589 
  16. Clipa, O. et al. (2023). Teachers’ self-efficacy and attitudes towards the use of information technology in classrooms. Educ. Sci. 13, Article No. 1001.  
  17. Cordova, W.M. & Linaugo,J.D. (2022). Pedagogical content knowledge practices of public school science teachers. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 37(1), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v37i1.7584 
  18. D’Angelo, C. (2018). The impact of technology: Student engagement and success. Technology and the Curriculum: Summer 2018. https://tinyurl.com/2tdztn37
  19. de Catalunya, G. (2018). Teachers’ digital competence in Catalonia. Servei de Comunicació i Publicacions. https://repositori.educacio.gencat.cat/handle/20.500.12694/229
  20. Department of Education. (2023). DepEd Order No. 016, s. 2023: Revised guidelines on the implementation of the DepEd computerization program. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DO_s2023_016.pdf
  21. Department of Education. (2017). DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2017: National adoption and implementation of the Philippine professional standards for teachers. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/DO_s2017_042-1.pdf
  22. De Vera, J. L., Andrada, M. D., Bello, A. Q., & De Vera, J. L. (2021). Teachers’ competencies in educational technology integration on instructional methodologies in the new normal. LUKAD: An Online Journal of Pedagogy, 1(1), 61-80. https://lukad.org/wpcontent/uploads/2021/06/volume1_issue1_devera_et_al_June2021.pdf.
  23. Durak, H.Y. (2021). Modelling of relations between K-12 teachers’ TPACK levels and their technology integration self-efficacy, technology literacy levels, attitudes toward technology, and usage objectives of social networks. Interactive Learn. Environ. 29, 1136–1162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1619591
  24. Engeness, I. (2020). Developing teachers’ digital identity: Towards the pedagogic design principles of digital environments to enhance students’ learning in the 21st century. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 96–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768. 2020.1849129
  25. Emerson, R.W. (2019). Cronbach’s alpha explained. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness (Online). Huntington 113(3), p. 327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X19858866
  26. Fanni, F., Rega, I., & Cantoni, L. (2013). Using self-efficacy to measure primary school teachers’ perception of ICT: Results from two studies. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT (IJEDICT), 9(1), 100–111. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1071345
  27. George, D. & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. In: Saidi, S.S. & Siew, N.M. (2019). Investigating the validity and reliability of survey attitudes towards statistical instruments among rural secondary school students. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(4), 651–661. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.4.651
  28. Ghavifekr, S. & Wan Rosdy, W.A. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 1(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.23596
  29. Grabe, M. & Grabe, C. (2007). Integrating Technology for Meaningful Learning (5th Ed.) Boston: Houghton Mifflin
  30. Hero, J. L. (2020). Teachers’ preparedness and acceptance of information and communication technology (ICT) integration and its effect on their ICT integration practices. Puissant – A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1, 59–76. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-76732-6
  31. Hilkemeijer, M. (2024, November 1). Why schools should invest in ICT. ICTE Solutions Australia. https://www.ictesolutions.com.au/blog/why-schools-should-invest-in-ict/
  32. Hoban, G., Nielsen, W., & Hyland, C. (2016). Blended media: Student-generated mash-ups to promote engagement with science content. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 8(3), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2016070103
  33. Hsu, C.Y., Tsai, M.J., Chang, Y.H. & Liang, J.C. (2017). Surveying in-service teachers’ beliefs about game-based learning and perceptions of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge of games. J. Educ. Technol. Soc., 20(1), 134-143. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.20.1.134
  34. Ifinedo, E., Rikala, J., & Hämäläinen, T. (2020). Factors affecting Nigerian teacher educators’ technology integration: considering characteristics, knowledge constructs, ICT practices, and beliefs. Comput. Educ., 146, 103760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103760
  35. Irwanto, I. (2021). Research trends in technological pedagogical content knowledge (tpack): a systematic literature review from 2010 to 2021. Eurasian J Educ Res., 10(4), 2045-2054. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.4.2045
  36. Joo, Y.J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Educ. Technol. Soc., 21, 48–59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26458506
  37. Kan, A. U., & Yel, E. (2019). The relationship between self-efficacy beliefs of teacher candidates and their attitudes about computer-assisted instruction. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(3), 248–264. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2019.03.017
  38. Kapadia, V. (2024). Classroom Teaching Redefined: A Revolution in Today’s World. Gyrus Learning Platform. https://www.gyrus.com/blogs/classroom-teaching
  39. Keser, H., Yilmaz, F.G.K. & Yilmaz, R. (2015). TPACK competencies and technology integration self-efficacy. Element. Educ. Online 14, 1193-1207. https://doi.org/10.17051/io.2015.65067
  40. Kerzic, D., Danko, M., Zorko, V. & Dečman, M. (2021). The effect of age on higher education teachers’ ICT use. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 13(2), 182-193. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2021.13.010
  41. Knezek, G. & Christensen, R. (2002). Impact of new information technologies on teachers and students. Educ. Inf. Technol. Educ. Inf. Technol. 7, 369–376. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020921807131
  42. Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? J Educ., 193(3), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303 
  43. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In: M. J. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 4th Edition, Springer-Verlag, New York, 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9
  44. König, J., Heine, S., Jäger-Biela, D., & Rothland, M. (2022). ICT integration in teachers ‘ lesson plans: a scoping review of empirical studies. Euro. J. Teacher Educ., 10, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2022.2138323
  45. Kynigos, C., Katsikis, A., Papadopoulos, I., Palaigeorgiou, G., & Kolovou, A. (2024). Criteria for evaluating digital technology used to support computational thinking via inquiry learning—The case of two educational software applications for mathematics and physics. Computers, 14(3), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14030090
  46. Ladendorf, K., Muehsler, H., Xie, Y., & Hinderliter, H. (2021). Teacher perspectives of self-efficacy and remote learning due to the emergency school closings of 2020. Educ. Media Int., 58, 124-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2021.1930481
  47. Ledford, D. M. (2016). Developing a professional learning framework to improve teacher practice in technology integration (Doctoral dissertation). Boise State University. https://matt-koehler.com/tpack2/newsletter-29-july-2016/
  48. Meelissen, M. R. (2005). ICT: More for Mickey than for Minnie? The role of primary education is to make information and communication technology more attractive for girls and boys. (Doctoral dissertation), University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  49. Mishra, P. (2019). Considering Contextual Knowledge: The TPACK Diagram Gets an Upgrade. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35, 76–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1588611
  50. Moreira-Fontán, E., García-Señorán, M., Conde-Rodríguez, Á., & González, A. (2019). Teachers’ ICT-related self-efficacy, job resources, and positive emotions: Their structural relations with autonomous motivation and work engagement. Computers & Education, 134, 63-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.007
  51. Moreno, S. (2015). ICT Integration – a Breakthrough in Teaching. https://www.depedmalaybalay.net/ict/ict-integration-a-breakthrough-in-teaching-html
  52. Msafiri, M. M., Kangwa, D. & Cai, L. (2023). A systematic literature review of ICT integration in secondary education: what works, what does not, and what next?. Discov Edu 2, 44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-023-00070-x
  53. Nipales, J.B. (2019). Competencies of Science Teachers in Teaching Science Subjects in the K to 12 Curriculum. International Journal of English, Literature and Social Science (IJELS), 4(4). https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijels.4442
  54. OECD. (2018). Teachers as designers of learning environments: The importance of innovative pedagogies. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264085374-en
  55. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2019). “TALIS 2018 results: Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. OECD. https://www.oecdilibrary.org/education/talis-2018-results-volume-i_1d0bc92a-en
  56. OECD. (2023). Programme for international student assessment (pisa) 2022 results (volume 1): The state of learning and equity in education, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en.
  57. Ozden, S. Y., Yang, H., Wen, H., & Shinas, V. H. (2024). Reflections from a teacher education course built on the TPACK framework: Examining the impact of the technology integration planning cycle on teacher candidates’ TPACK development and practice. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100869
  58. Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
  59. Rizzi M.C. (2020). The impact of professional development on technology integration: A mixed-methods action research study of teachers new to Ocean County School District [dissertation]. University of South Carolina. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/5806/
  60. Roddrigues, M., Fernández-Macías, E., Sostero, M. (2021). A unified conceptual framework of tasks, skills, and competences, Seville: European Commission, JRC121897. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC121897
  61. Saavedra, J. (2020). Educational challenges and opportunities of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. World Bank Blogs, 23. https://tinyurl.com/33bhcmkf
  62. Sabic, J., Baranovic, B. & Rogosic, S. (2022). Teachers’ Self-Efficacy for using information and communication technology: The interaction effect of gender and age, v.21 (2) p353-373. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2022.11
  63. Samson, M., Gamboa, R., Genobiagon, C., & Tan, D. (2021). Assessing the proficiency level in digital competences of science teachers in the Philippines. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 17(1), 44–59. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1402826.pdf
  64. Santos, J.M. & Castro, R.D.R. (2021). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (tpack) in action: Application of learning in the classroom by pre-service teachers (PST). Soc Sci Humanit Open, 3(1), 100110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100110
  65. Sarfo, F. K., Amankwah, F., & Konin, D. (2017). Computer self-efficacy among senior high school teachers in Ghana and the functionality of demographic variables on their computer self-efficacy. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 16(1), 19–31. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1124909
  66. Sefyrin, J. (2005). Understanding of gender and competence in ICT. In A. Archibald, J. Emms, F. Grundy, J. Pagne & E. Tuner (Eds). The gender politics of ICT (pp. 95–106). London: Middlesex University Press.
  67. SEI-DOST & UP NISMED (2011). Framework for Philippine science teacher education. Manila: SEI-DOST & UP NISMED. ISBN: 978-971-8600-45-0. https://tinyurl.com/246eyfd4
  68. Siddiq, F. & Scherer, R. (2016). The relation between teachers’ emphasis on the development of students’ digital information and communication skills and computer self-efficacy: the moderating roles of age and gender. Large-Scale Assessment in Education, 4(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-016-0032-4
  69. Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
  70. Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What it means, how to respond. World Economic Forum. https://tinyurl.com/ms4mef9t
  71. Scott, A., & Martin, A. (2019). Developing student 21st-century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1
  72. Sun, Y., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2022). Teacher education interventions on teacher TPACK: A meta-analysis study. Sustainability, 14(18), 11791. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811791
  73. Tesalona, Z. (2019). Ten principles for ICT in education in developing countries. SCRIBD. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/5n75szuc
  74. Teo, T. (2014). Unpacking teachers’ acceptance of technology: Tests of measurement invariance and latent mean differences. Comput. Educ. 75, 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.014
  75. Thoms, L.-J., Colberg, C., Heiniger, P., & Huwer, J. (2022). Digital competencies for science teaching: Adapting the DiKoLAN framework to teacher education in Switzerland. Frontiers in Education, 7, 802170. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.802170
  76. Tikva, C., &Tambouris, E. (2021). Mapping computational thinking through programming in K-12 education: A conceptual model based on a systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 162, Article 104083 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104083
  77. Tomaro, Q. P. & Mutiarin, D. (2018). ICT integration in the educational system of the Philippines. Journal of Governance and Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.5399
  78. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P.A. & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555-575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
  79. Turno, M. (2020). Importance of the school Science education. SCRIBD. https://tinyurl.com/5n7zywza
  80. Tosuntaş, Ş. B., Cubukcu, Z., & Beauchamp, G. (2021). Teacher performance in terms of technopedagogical content knowledge competencies. Kastamonu Education Journal, 29(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.726886
  81. UNESCO. (2018). ICT competency framework for teachers (Version 3). United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265721
  82. UNESCO. (2020). Guidance on the use of the unesco ict competency framework for teachers. United nations educational, scientific, and cultural organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000372681
  83. UNESCO. (2023). UNESCO’s ICT competency framework for teachers (Version 3). Paris: UNESCO. ISBN: 978-92-3-100285-4. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265721
  84. UNESCO. (2023). Information and communication technology (ICT) in education. IIEP Learning Portal. https://tinyurl.com/2kucpct5
  85. Vannatta, R. A., & Fordham, K. (2004). Teacher dispositions and technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2004.10782415
  86. Villasanta, R. (2022). Improving the performance practice of 21st-century music of grade 10 students through digital learning material. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation (AJMRI). https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v1i3.322
  87. Van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
  88. Voogt, J. Knezek, G., Cox, M., Knezek, D. & Brummelhuis, A. (2013). Under which conditions does ICT have a positive effect on teaching and learning? A Call to Action. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(1), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.00453.x
  89. Wong, K., Teo, T., & Russo, S. (2012). Influence of gender and computer teaching efficacy on computer acceptance among Malaysian student teachers: An extended technology acceptance model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 28(7), 1190–1207. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.796
  90. Wang, A.Y. (2022). Understanding levels of technology integration: A TPACK scale for EFL teachers to promote 21st-century learning. Educ. Inf. Technol., 27, 9935–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11033-4
  91. Wang, Q. (2020). A study of ICL teachers’ TPACK, technology attitude, and self-efficacy on technology integration. J. Northeast Normal Univ., 57, 127–135. https://doi.org/10.16783/j.cnki.nwnus.2020.05.014
  92. Wang, X.; Zhang, R.; Wang, Z.; Li, T. (2021). How does digital competence preserve university students’ psychological well-being during the pandemic? An investigation from self-determination theory. Front. Psychol. 12, 652594. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652594
  93. Wang, Q., & Zhao, G. (2021). ICT self-efficacy mediates most of the effects of university ICT support on preservice teachers’ TPACK, as evidenced by three normal universities in China. Br. J Educ. Technol. 52(6), 2319–2339. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13141
  94. Weber, A.M. & Greiff, S. (2023). ICT skills in developing 21st century skills: A (cognitive) developmental perspective through early childhood. Applied Sciences. 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/app13074615
  95. Williams, M.K., Christensen, R., McElroy, D., & Rutledge, D. (2023). Teacher self-efficacy in technology integration is critical in designing technology-infused teacher preparation programs. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 239(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13141
  96. Yang, L. (2018). Fuzzy cluster correlation mapping for online evaluation of teaching efficacy towards IoT study. Cogn. Syste. Res., 52, 365–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.07.025
  97. Yusuf, M. O. & Balogun, M.R. (2011). Student-teachers’ competence and attitude towards information and communication technology: A case study in a Nigerian university. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2(1), 18-36. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6041.
  98. Zhang, Y., & Zheng, X. (2021). The Impact of Professional Development on Teacher Technology Integration: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 841-864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09964-2

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic