HomeJournal of Multidisciplinary Studiesvol. 13 no. 2 (2024)

Sensemaking and Media Logic of Filipino Environmental Activist Groups in Communicating Climate Science and Action

Renz KevinĀ  M. Alcazar | Santosh K. Digal

 

Abstract:

Climate change is a reality felt across all sectors of society and in many countries. The Philippines, a developing country, has been cited as one of the most vulnerable countries to climate change even though several reports point to developed countries as major contributors of historical greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. With the release of the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), it was concluded that the global surface temperature will continue to increase and may exceed the 1.5-degree Celsius threshold. This makes climate change the most serious issue among other environmental problems and requires concerted effort from all levels of government, public and private sectors, and civil society. One of the crucial voices in the climate change discussions is the environmental activist groups. Multiple case studies of three mainstream and three grassroots environmental activist groups based in the National Capital Region (NCR) and provinces showed that they consult science and use media to communicate climate action in their online and on-the-ground campaigns. Their understanding of climate science allows them to perform their roles and functions and communicate effectively with other change agents such as the government, scientific community, industry, media, and ordinary citizens. They likewise use social media accounts to meet where their audiences mostly are and produce creative multimedia materials imbued with specific climate action messages. This study proves that environmental activist groups are critical sources of climate change-related messages. They demonstrate high value for research and social media as foundations for their communication strategies.



References:

  1. AGHAM - Advocates of Science and Technology. (2017). Praymer hinggil sa pambansang industriyalisasyon. https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/primer-on-national-industrialization-full-text-filipino/72802702
  2. Altheide, D. L. (2015). Media logic. The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication. https://doi.org/10.1002/97811185 41555.wbiepc088
  3. Anderson, A. A. & Huntington, H. E. (2017). Social media, science, and attack discourse: How Twitter discussions of climate change use sarcasm and incivility. Science Communication, 39(5), 598–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017735113
  4. Bai, X. et al., (2018). Six research priorities for cities and climate change. Nature, 555, 23-25. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-02409-z
  5. Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., McHugh, L., & Hayes, S. C. (2004). Relational frame theory: Some implications for understanding and treating human psychopathology. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4, 355–375.
  6. Boehm, S. & Schumer, C. (2023, March 20). 10 big findings from the 2023 IPCC report on climate change. https://www.wri.org/insights/2023-ipcc-ar6-synthesis-report-climate-change-findings
  7. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  8. Brüggemann, M. & Rödder, S., eds. (2020). Global warming in local discourses: How communities around the world make sense of climate change. Cambridge, U.K.: Open Book Publishers. https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/1177
  9. Chawla, L. & Cushing, D. F. (2007). Education for strategic environmental behavior. Environmental Education Research 13, 437–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701581539
  10. Climate Change Commission. (2018). Climate change and the Philippines: Executive brief. https://climate.gov.ph/files/ CC_ExecutiveBrief_V32.compressed.pdf
  11. Dahlstrom, M. F. (2014, September 16). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 13614-13620. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320645111
  12. Dai, J., Zeng, F., & Wang, Y. (2016). Publicity strategies and media logic: Communication campaigns of environmental NGOs in China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 10(1),1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2016.1267024
  13. Davis, L., Fähnrich, B., Nepote, A. C., Riedlinger, M., & Trench, B. (2018). Environmental communication and science communication—Conversations, connections and collaborations. Environmental Communication, 12(02), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1436082
  14. Deng, G. (2004). Evolution and development of Chinese NGOs. Wenweipo, 2. 4-6.
  15. Department of Communication of University of Pittsburgh. (2024). Audience analysis. https://www.comm.pitt.edu/oral-comm-lab/audience-analysis
  16. Dietz, T., Guagnano, G.A., & Stern, P.C. (1998). Social structure and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior 30(4), 450-471. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659803000402
  17. Dono, J., Richardson, B. A., & Webb, J. (2010). The relationship between environmental activism, pro-environmental behaviour and social identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 178-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.006
  18. Doyle, J. (2009). Climate action and environmental activism: The role of environmental NGOs and grassroots movements in the global politics of climate change. In T. Boyce, & J. Lewis (Eds.), Climate Change and the Media, 103-116. https://research.brighton.ac.uk/en/publications/climate-action-and-environmental-activism-the-role-of-environment
  19. Duan, R. & Miller, S. (2019). Climate change in China: A study of news diversity in party-sponsored and market-oriented newspapers. Journalism, 12(10), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1464884919873173
  20. Dziminska, M., Mendoza-Poudereux, I., Pellegrini, G. and Rowland, J. (2021). ‘Climate change and public perception. Citizens’ proposals for better communication and involvement’. JCOM, 20(03), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20030209
  21. Eden, S. (2010). NGOs, the science-lay dichotomy and hybrid spaces of environmental knowledge. In P. Meusburger, D. Livingstone and H. Jöns (Eds.), Geographies of Science, 217–230. Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8611-2_12
  22. Ellaban, O., Abu-Rub, H., & Blaabjerg, F. (2014, July 11). Renewable energy resources: Current status, future prospects and their enabling technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 748-764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.113
  23. Engetou, M. R. (2017, May). Impact of insufficient personnel on organizational performance. https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/ handle/10024/141344/Marok%20Engetou%20Thesis.pdf?sequence=1
  24. Erlyani, N., Rahimi, R. N., Lestari, N., Oktavia, S., Putra, A. P., & Shadiqi, M. A. (2020). Pro-environmental organizational activities, participation, and life events: A narrative inquiry of South Kalimantan environmental activists. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 494, 144–156. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201125.012
  25. Fähnrich, B. (2018). Digging deeper? Muddling through? How environmental activists make sense and use of science—an exploratory study. Journal of Science Communication, 17(3), A08, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.17030208.
  26. Fähnrich, B., Riedlinger, M., & Weitkamp, E. (2020). Activists as “alternative” science communicators — Exploring the facets of science communication in societal contexts. Journal of Science Communication, 19(06), C01. https://doi.org/10.22323 /2.19060301
  27. Feldman, L., Hart, P. S., & Milosevic, T. (2015). Polarizing news? Representations of threat and efficacy in leading US newspapers’ coverage of climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 26(4), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515595348
  28. Fielding, K. S., McDonald, R., & Louis, W.R. (2008). Theory of planned behaviour, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(4), 318-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.03.003
  29. Fielding, K. S. & Hornsey, M. J. (2016). A social identity analysis of climate change and environmental attitudes and behaviors: insights and opportunities. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 121. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00121
  30. Fløttum, K., Gjerstad, Ø., & Skiple, J. K. (2021). Climate change and lifestyle: people’s expressed motivations to adopt or not adopt a climate-friendly way of life. ASp, 79, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.7273
  31. Fung, C. Y. & Adams, E. A. (2017, November 05). What motivates student environmental activists on college campuses? An in-depth qualitative study. Social Sciences MDPI Journal, 6(134), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6040134
  32. Gabriel, A. G., Santiago, P. N. M., & Casimiro, R. R. (2021). Mainstreaming disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation in comprehensive development planning of the cities in Nueva Ecija in the Philippines. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 12, 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-021-00351-9
  33. Gaillard, J. C., & Maceda, E. A. (2009). Participatory tree-dimensional mapping for disaster risk reduction. In H. Reid, et al. (Eds.), Community-Based Adaptation to Climate Change, 109–118. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
  34. Gardner, C.J., Thierry, A., Rowlandson, W., Steinberger, J.K. (2021). From publications to public actions: the role of universities in facilitating academic advocacy and activism in the climate and ecological emergency. Frontiers in Sustainability, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2021.679019
  35. Global Witness. (2021, September 13). Global Witness reports 227 land and environmental activists murdered in a single year, the worst figure on record. https://www.globalwitness.org/en/press-releases/global-witness-reports-227-land-and-environmental-activists-murdered-single-year-worst-figure-record/
  36. Gyampoh, B. A., Idinoba, M., & Amisah, S. (2008). Water scarcity under a changing climate in Ghana: Options for livelihoods adaptation. Development, 51, 415–417. http://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2008.46
  37. Hampton, S. & Whitmarsh, L. (2023, September 15). Choices for climate action: A review of the multiple roles individuals play. One Earth, 6(9), 1157-1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.08.006
  38. Hansen, A. (2011). Communication, media and environment: Towards reconnecting research on the production, content and social implications of environmental communication. The International Communication Gazette, 73(1–2), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1748048510386739
  39. Holden, W. N. (2005). Civil society opposition to nonferrous metals mining in the Philippines. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 16(3), 223-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-005-7723-1
  40. Holmberg, K. & Hellsten, I. (2015). Gender differences in the climate change communication on Twitter. Internet Research, 25(5), 811 - 828. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IntR-07-2014-0179
  41. Hornsey, M. J. & Fielding, K. S. (2019). Understanding (and reducing) inaction on climate change. Social Issues and Policy Review, 14(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12058
  42. Hourdequin, M. (2021). Lecture 6: Epistemic Justice and Climate Change. Contesting Climate Change. Colorado College, Colorado Springs, Colorado.
  43. IBON Foundation. (2016, June 30). Promote national industrialization for national development. https://www.ibon.org/promote-national-industrialization-for-national-development/
  44. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014).  Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability: Summary for policymakers. Fifth Assessment Report of the IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/ar5_wgII_spm_en-1.pdf
  45. IPCC. (2023). Summary for Policymakers. In H. Lee and J. Romero (Eds.), Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 1-34. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647.001  
  46. International Renewable Energy Agency. (2021). World energy transitions outlook: 1.5°C pathway. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2021/March/IRENA_World_Energy_Transitions_Outlook_2021.pdf?rev=67e7a4adee5140fab546f27d94d68dd7
  47. Ivanova, D., Barett, J., Wiedenhofer, D., Macura, B., Callaghan, M., & Creutzig, F. (2020). Quantifying the potential for climate change mitigation of consumption options. Environmental Research Letters, 15(9). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8589
  48. Jamison, A. (1996). The shaping of the global environmental agenda: The role of non-governmental organisations. In S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, & B. Wynne (Eds.), Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology, 224–245. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  49. Jasanoff, S. (2010). A new climate for society. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2-3), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409361497
  50. Kaushal, S., Dhammi, S., & Guha, A. (2021). Climate crisis and language – A constructivist ecolinguistic approach. Materials Today: Proceedings, 49(8), 3581-3584. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.matpr.2021.08.093
  51. Kellstedt, P. M., Zahran, S., & Vedlitz, A. (2008). Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Anal., 28, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01010.x
  52. Li, D., & Chen, J. (2015). Significant life experiences on the formation of environmental action among Chinese college students. Environmental Education Research, 21(4), 612-630.
  53. Li, Y. (2015). Communicating climate change: Channels, sources, contents and outreach strategies based on China survey. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 6(10), 732-736. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJESD. 2015.V6.689
  54. Lubell, M., Zahran, S., & Vedlitz, A. (2007). Collective action and citizen responses to global warming. Political Behavior, 29, 391–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-006-9025-2
  55. Maddy, S. (2021, March 24). Communicating climate change: Why is language important in the fight against climate change? https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/e574d2327628416ea158ca5fd0fb7185
  56. Maeseele, P. A. (2009). NGOs and GMOs. A case study in alternative science communication. Conference Papers. In 2009 Annual Meeting. (Chicago, IL, U.S.A.). International Communication Association.
  57. Marquart-Pyatt, S. (2012). Explaining environmental activism across countries. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal, 25(7), 638-699. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2011.625073
  58. Mazzoleni, G. (2008). Media logic. The International Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecm040
  59. Mazzoleni, G. & Splendore, S. (2018). Media logic. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780199756841/obo-9780199756841-0166.xml
  60. Moser, S.C. & Dilling, L. (eds) (2007) Creating a climate for change: communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  61. Obregón, R. & Tufte, T. (2017). Communication, social movements, and collective action: Toward a new research agenda in communication for development and social change. Journal of Communication, 67(5), 635–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/ jcom.12332
  62. Population Matters. (2024). Climate change. https://populationmatters. org/climate-change/
  63. Ritchie, H. (2019, October 01). Who has contributed most to global CO2 emissions? Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/ contributed-most-global-co2
  64. Rödder, S. (2020). The ambivalent role of environmental NGOs in climate communication. Journal of Science Communication, 19(06), C03. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.19060303
  65. Rosenthal, S. (2022). Information sources, perceived personal experience, and climate change beliefs. Journal of Environmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101796
  66. Rucht, D. (2004). The quadruple ‘A’: Media strategies of protest movements since the 1960s. In W. van de Donk, B. Loader, P. G. Nixon & D. Rucht (Eds.), Cyperprotest, new media, citizens and social movements, 29–56. London and New York: Routledge.
  67. Sanz-Menéndez, L. & Cruz-Castro, L. (2019). The credibility of scientific communication sources regarding climate change: A population-based survey experiment. Public Understanding of Science, 28(5), 534-553. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519840946
  68. Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2013). Personally-relevant climate change: The role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environment and Behavior, 45(1), 60-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511421196
  69. Schäfer, M. S. (2012). Online communication on climate change and climate politics: A literature review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3(6), 527-543. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.191
  70. Schmidt, A. (2012). Movements, counter movements, NGOs: Climate communication of civil society actors]. In I. Neverla and M. S. Schäfer (Eds.), The Media Climate, 69–94. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94217-9_4
  71. See, J., Fuentes, A. S., Porio, E., & Wilmsen, B. (2024). Conceptualising and enacting pathways to transformative climate justice: Examples from the Philippines. Local Environment. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2024.2353040
  72. Séguin, C. Pelletier, L. G., & Hunsley, J. (1998). Toward a model of environmental activism. Environment and Behavior 30(05), 628-652. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659803000503
  73. Snow, D. & Benford, R. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1(1), 197-217.
  74. Solyst, J. (2023, February 09). A Baltimore-based climate activist puts people at the center of sustainability. https://www.chesapeakebay.net/news/blog/a-baltimore-based-climate-activist-puts-people-at-the-center-of-sustainability
  75. Stern, P. C. (2012). Fear and hope in climate messages. Nature Climate Change, 2(8), 572-573. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1610
  76. Swain, K. A. (2012). Mass media roles in climate change mitigation. In W.Y. Chen, J. Seiner, T. Suzuki, & M. Lackner (Eds.), Handbook of climate change mitigation (Vol. 3, pp. 161–195). Springer.
  77. Sunga, J. M. C. (2010, April 07). Negotiating the corporate social responsibility at the interface of environmental NGOs and corporations [Master’s thesis, University of the Philippines]. National Library of the Philippines.
  78. Tirosh, O. (2020). “Fighting Climate Change With Translation, language and Stories.” Tomedes. Tomedes, 15 Jan. 2020, https://www.tomedes.com/translator-hub/fight-climate-change-translation
  79. Tvinnereim, E., Fløttum, K., Gjerstad, Ø., Johannesson, M. P., & Nordø, A. D. (2017). “Citizens’ preferences for tackling climate change. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of their freely formulated solutions”. Global Environmental Change, 46, 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.06.005
  80. Unday, J. E., Banzuela, S. O., Dalisay, J. B., Aromin, M. L., & Pingao, R. G. (2010). Introduction to environmental science. Mutya Publishing House, Inc.
  81. Ung, M., Luginaah, I., Chuenpagdee, R., & Campbell, G. (2015, December 24). Perceived self-efficacy and adaptation to climate change in coastal Cambodia. Climate, 4(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli4010001
  82. United Nations. (2021, August 9). IPCC report: ‘Code red’ for human driven global heating, warns UN chief. https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/08/1097362
  83. United Nations. (2023). The sustainable development goals report: Special edition. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2023.pdf
  84. United States Agency for International Development. (2017). Climate change risk profile: Philippines. https://www.climatelinks.org/ resources/climate-risk-profile-philippines
  85. Urai, A. E. & Kelly, C. (2023). Rethinking academia in a time of climate crisis. eLife, 12. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84991
  86. Veltri, G. A., & Atanasova, D. (2015). Climate change on Twitter: Content, media ecology and information sharing behaviour. Public Understanding of Science, 26, 721-737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515613702
  87. Vu, H. T. Blomberg, M., Seo, H., Liu, Y., Shayesteh, F., & Do, H. V. (2021). Social media and environmental activism: Framing climate change on Facebook by Global NGOs. Science Communication, 43(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020971644
  88. Wibeck, V. & Linnér, B. (2021). Sense-making analysis: A framework for multi-strategy and cross-country research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406921998907
  89. World Health Organization. (2021, October 30). Climate change and health. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/climate -change-and-health
  90. Wren, R. (2023, March 02). The importance of advocacy in public policy: A social worker’s role. https://fieldcenteratpenn.org/news/the-importance-of-advocacy-in-public-policy-a-social-workers-role/
  91. Yeh, E.T. (2015). How can experience of local residents be “knowledge”? Challenges in interdisciplinary climate change research. Area, 1–8. http://doi.org/10.1111/area.12189
  92. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and method (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.