HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 21 no. 2 (2024)

The Attitude and Performance of Junior High School Students of a Chinese School in Mathematics Taught in Mandarin and English

Ofelia Aljade E. Ramos

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study delved into the comparison of students' performance and attitudes toward Mathematics in Junior High School when taught in English and Mandarin, aiming to discern the influence of language on student outcomes. By drawing upon Don Elger's Performance Theory and Daniel Katz's Functionalist Theory of Attitudes, the research explored how instructional language shapes student attitudes and performance in Mathematics. Utilizing a descriptive correlational analysis approach, data from structured questionnaires and academic grades were scrutinized using statistical methods such as t-tests, weighted mean, standard deviation, and the Pearson Product-Moment Coefficient of Correlation to unveil patterns and relationships between instructional language, attitude, and academic achievement in Mathematics. The findings revealed significant insights: (1) No significant difference was observed in the performance of students in Mathematics taught in English versus Mandarin; (2) Significant disparities emerged in the attitudes of students toward Mathematics when taught in English versus Mandarin; (3) Negligible and insignificant correlations were found between students' performance and attitude in Mathematics taught in Mandarin; and (4) Low but significant correlations were observed between students' performance and attitude in Mathematics taught in English. These findings underscored the pivotal role of attitude in academic performance, aligning with the Functionalist Theory of Attitudes, which posits that individuals seek to maximize rewards and minimize penalties in their environment. Furthermore, the results supported the Theory of Performance, suggesting that educators, regardless of the instructional language, should enhance teaching methodologies to enhance students' proficiency in Mathematics.



References:

  1. American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges. (2018). IMPACT: Improving Mathematical Prowess And College  Teaching. https://cdn.ymaws.com/amatyc.site-ym.com/resource/resmgr/impact/impact2018-11-5.pdf
  2. ARCS Model of Motivational Design Theories. (n.d.). https://learning-theories.com/kellers-arcs-model-of-motivational-design.html
  3. Attitude. (n.d.). Lecture 02 - Social Psych. https://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/xsoc530/attitudes.html
  4. Ayuwanti, I., Marsigit, M., & Siswoyo, D. (2021). Teacher-student interaction in mathematics learning. International Journal of  Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 10(2), 660. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21184
  5. Bahtilla, M., & Xu, H. (2021). The Influence of Confucius’s Educational Thoughts on China’s Educational System. OALib, 08(05),  1–17. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107370
  6. Bermejo, V., Ester, P., & Morales, I. (2021). How the Language of Instruction Influences Mathematical Thinking Development in the  First Years of Bilingual Schoolers. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 533141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.533141
  7. He, Y., Xiong, B., Lin, T., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Mathematics competitions in China: Practice and influence. ZDM – Mathematics  Education, 54(5), 1087–1100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01325-3
  8. Ho, Michael Wong. (2024, April 3). Filipino-Chinese schools prepare students for business success. Manila Standard.  https://manilastandard.net/lgu/314431955/filipino-chinese-schools-prepare-students-for-business-success.html
  9. International Mathematical Olympiad. (2019). International Mathematical Olympiad 2019. https://www.imo official.org/year_country_r.aspx?year=2019
  10. Mazana, M. Y., Montero, C. S., & Casmir, R. O. (2018). Investigating Students’ Attitude towards Learning Mathematics. International  Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/3997
  11. Mcleod, S. (2023). What Is Cognitive Dissonance Theory? What Is Cognitive Dissonance Theory?
  12. Moschkovich, J. N., Wagner, D., Bose, A., Rodrigues Mendes, J., & Schütte, M. (Eds.). (2018). Language and Communication in  Mathematics Education. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75055-2
  13. Nahole, M., & Haimbodi, F. N. (2022). Pre-service teachers’ mathematical concepts in indigenous languages: Challenges encountered  in multilingual classrooms, Rundu urban, Namibia. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 7(1),  36–45. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v7i1.15482
  14. Tang, Y., & Hu, J. (2022). The impact of teacher attitude and teaching approaches on student demotivation: Disappointment as a  mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 985859. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.985859
  15. Wijaya, T. T., Rahmadi, I. F., Chotimah, S., Jailani, J., & Wutsqa, D. U. (2022). A Case Study of Factors That Affect Secondary School  Mathematics Achievement: Teacher-Parent Support, Stress Levels, and Students’ Well-Being. International Journal of Environmental  Research and Public Health, 19(23), 16247. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316247
  16. Wilkinson, L. C., Bailey, A. L., & Maher, C. A. (2018). Students’ Mathematical Reasoning, Communication, and Language  Representations: A Video-Narrative Analysis. ECNU Review of Education, 1(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.30926/ecnuroe2018010301
  17. Zhao, W. (2020). Predicament and outlook of China’s math education. National Science Review, 7(9), 1513–1517.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa070.
  18. Zhou Ying, Tanu Wijaya, T., & Gao Ya. (2020). INVESTIGATION ON THE ATTITUDE OF MATHEMATICS EDUCATION  STUDENTS TOWARDS LEARNING MATHEMATICS IN GUILIN. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 93–102.  https://doi.org/10.22236/KALAMATIKA.vol5no2.2020pp93-102