Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 20 no. 10 (2024)

Implication on Effects of Technological, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) Framework Application of Master Teachers on Students’ Performance: Basis for Capacity Building

Edgar Ramirez

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This aims to identify the implication of Technological, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) Framework on Students’ Performance. Purposive sampling was used to identify the respondent schools, stratified random sampling was used to identify the teacher respondents and proportional sampling was used to identify the student respondents. Technological Knowledge, Based on the combined mean of teachers’ and students’ perception, Master teachers are “Excellent” in “Preparing the instructional materials for different types of learners.” With respect to Pedagogical Knowledge, On the combined weighted mean of Master teachers and students, teachers are “Excellent” in “Acting as facilitator and encourages students’ leadership roles in activities.”. The only “Very Satisfactory” is “Establishing competencies between the lessons and the students’ actual environment.” With respect to Content Knowledge, Based on the combined computed weighted mean of the perception of the two respondents, Master teachers are “Excellent” in nine items with one “Very Satisfactory”. Among the “Excellent” is “Updating the knowledge on the subject matter”. The only “Very Satisfactory” is “Utilizing content-based approaches for individual learner”. The Level of Students’ Academic Performance in terms of Average Grade for the First Quarter is “Very Satisfactory”. The following conclusions were drawn from the study: Both Teacher- respondents and student respondents rated teachers as “Very Satisfactory” in the application of the TPACK framework with respect to Technological Knowledge and “Excellent” with respect to Pedagogical Knowledge and Content Knowledge. Both teachers and students are satisfied with pedagogical approaches and mastery of subjects but needs improvement in technological aspects. The academic performance of students who are exposed to TPACK Framework are very satisfactory. The students’ performance is related to the framework that the teachers use to deliver their lessons since understanding and performance of students depend on materials, strategies and knowledge of the teachers who discuss the lessons and give their activities. The background of teachers on TPACK framework is related to their teaching competencies as they apply this in their teaching. The perceptions of the respondents vary; however the pedagogical knowledge is viewed with significant difference which may refer to the principles in lesson delivery that also vary from one teacher to another. Content knowledge and technological knowledge are viewed the same since the expected competencies are structured and the technical knowledge of the teacher are of the same level. Teachers’ age, sex, strand and highest educational attainment do not affect their utilization of the framework. However, length of service matter since their experience in teaching becomes advantageous. Students’ age and grade level do not affect their academic performance. However, students’ performance may vary depending upon on their sex since motivation, opinion and focus vary according to sex. The most encountered problem of the Senior High School teachers in applying Technological, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) Framework is the need to identify which specific technologies are best suited for addressing specific learning needs of the students. The best practice of the Senior High School Teachers in Applying Technological, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) Framework is creating an engaging learning environment.



References:

  1. Agellon, Suzette O. (2017). Leadership Styles of School Administrators and Job Satisfaction of Teachers in the Division of Laguna.  Unpublished Disseratation. University Rizal System. Morong Rizal 
  2. Agustin, F. Y. (2019). Reflection in pre-service teacher education: Exploring the nature of four EFL pre-service teachers’ reflections.  Reflective Practice, 20(1), 1-14.
  3. Agustini, Santyasa, Ratminingsih Pendidikan Ganesha, (2019) Analysis of Competence on “TPACK”: 21st Century Teacher  Professional Development 1. International Conference on Education, Science and Technology 2019 Journal of Physics:  Conference Series 1387 (2019) 012035 IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1387/1/012035
  4. Amarachukwu Nkechi, N., David-Okoro, I., & Chioma Stephanie, M. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on science education  in Anambra State of Nigeria. American Journal of Higher Education, 9(2), 1-10.
  5. American University/Blog (2020) How Important Is Technology In Education? Benefits, Challenges, And Impact On Students Bevins, Audrey M. Factors Related to Academic Success among Nursing Students: A Descriptive Correlational Research Study. June  2014Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages 918–923 Retrieved February 10, 2018 from PlumX Metrics DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.12.005 
  6. Borg, Simon (2019). Teacher Cognition and Language Education. Bloomsburry Classic in Languistics Bustos, Edna M. and Pilobello, Bernadette I. (2018) Observed Classroom Practices and Academic Behavior in Physical Education 1  of Freshman Psychology and Education Students College of Education, Arts and Sciences, Lyceum of the Philippines University,  Batangas City, Philippines Retrieved February 7, 2018 from http://oaji.net/articles/2015/1710-1440092732.pdf 
  7. Comighud, J., Dare, E. & Futlan, Roehrig, G. (2019). From Consumers to Creators: Adventure Learning and its Impacton Preservice  Teachers’ TPACK and Technology Integration. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information  Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2016 (pp. 2834-2841).
  8. Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement  of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved September 15, 2016 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/172096 Education Endowment Foundation. (2019). Digital technology: Moderate impact for moderate cost based on extensive evidence.  https://educationendowment foundation.org.uk/evidence summaries/teaching learning-toolkit/digital-technology/
  9. Fauth Benjamin, Decristan, Jasmin, Decker Ann Thereseia, et.al (2019) The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in  elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102882Get rights and content
  10. Gangue, Gilda C. (2017). Correlate of Competence and Performance of Master Teachers in the Province of Rizal. Unpublished Master’s  Thesis. University of Rizal System. Morong Rizal 
  11. Gerhard, Theresia Deckerce BüttnerceIlonca Hardy Eckhard Kliemec Mareik Kunterce (2019) The effects of teacher competence on  student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102882Get rights and content
  12. Gordon, Johannes and Kramer Charlotte. Teacher Professional Knowledge and Classroom Management: On the Relation of General  Pedagogical Knowledge (GPK) and Classroom Management Expertise (CME) Volume 48, Issue 1–2, pp 139–151 Retrieved February  5, 2018 from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11858-015-0705-4 
  13. Hakim, Adnan Contribution of Competence Teacher (Pedagogical, Personality, Professional Competence and Social) On the  Performance of Learning. The International Journal Of Engineering And Science (IJES) || Volume || 4 || Issue || 2 || Pages || PP.01-12||  2015 || ISSN (e): 2319 – 1813 ISSN (p): 2319 – 1805 The IJES Page 1 Retrieved February 15, 2018 from  https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/36989616/A42301012.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1518063193&Signature=imNuXXce2Zw3MKz23Ny14HfAVuA%3D&response-content disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3Dontribution_of_Competence_Teacher_Pedago.pdf 
  14. Harper, B. (2018). Technology and teacher-student interactions: A review of empirical research. Journal of Research on Technology  in Education, 50(3), 214-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1450690
  15. Herrington, H.A.V. (2017). Curriculum planning for learning and its relationshipwith teacher performance. Cesar Vallejo University. Herodotou, C., Aristeidou, M., Sharples, M., and Scanlon, E. (2018). Designing citizen science tools for learning: lessons learnt from  the iterative development of nQuire. Res Pract. Technol. Enhanced Lear. 13:4. doi: 10.1186/s41039-018-0072-1 Ibrahim, N. (2017). What master teachers do: A case study of planning, facilitating, role modelling and developing materials.  International Education Studies, 6(6).
  16. Jones, A. (2017). Considering pedagogical content knowledge in the context of research on teaching: An example from technology.  Waikato Journal of Education.
  17. Kuswandono Paulus and Sanata (2019) “Thriving through Reflecting”: Current Perspective on Teacher Professional Development  Research in Asia Context Krismalita Sekar Diasti, Sanata Dharma University, YogyakartaDharma University, Yogyakarta Laudea, T.M. et. Al (2018). Master teachers as instructional leaders: An exploration of school leadership capacity in the division of  Biliran. International Journal of Sciences: basic and Applied Research, 40(1): 50 – 74. 
  18. Locsin, M.R.Q. (2019) Application of Technological, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) Framework on Students’  Performance Dissertation University of Rizal System Pililla, Rizal
  19. McEwan, Elaine (2018) Seven Steps to Effective Instructional Leadership 2nd Edition
  20. McKnight, Von, Acquah, Emmanuel O, Tandon, Madhavi and Lempinen, Sonia. (2017) Teacher Diversity Awareness in the Context  of Changing Demographics. University of Colorado at Denver, USA Sage Journal European Educational Research Journal First  Published November 9, 2017 Retrieved February 10, 2018 from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1474904115611676  Mitchell, R. (2018). Experts Warn Play Time is ‘Disappearing’ as EmphasisnAvailable online at: http://bit.ly/2FTIVGh (accessed June  27, 2018).
  21. Oredina, Nora A. and Ebueza, Rachelle D. (2020) Teachers’ Competence and Students’ Academic Performance in Mathematics: A  Brief Cross-sectional Case in Don Mariano Marcos Memorial State University, Philippines College of Education, Don Mariano  Marcos Memorial State University, Bacnotan, Philippines Universal Journal of Educational Research 8(12A): 7766-7774, 2020  http://www.hrpub.org
  22. Ritchie, Jafar Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Volume 53, June 2018, Pages 49-57 Elsevier 2018 Retrieved February  20, 2018 from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048314001480 
  23. Rosier, D.I.M. (2021). The innovation process is a priority in the development of pedagogical sciences. European Journal of Research  Development and Sustainability, 2(3).
  24. Santos, Joseline M. and Castro Rowell D.R. (2019) Technological Pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: Application of  learning in the classroom by pre-service teachers (PST Social Sciences & Humanities Open Volume 3, Issue 1, 2021, 100110 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291121000061
  25. Shapiro Joan Poliner and Etefkovich Jacqueline A.(2018) “Ethical Leadership and Decision Making Education Applying Theoretical  Perspectives to Complex Dilemmas Fourth Edition
  26. Whitelock Denise, Scanlon Eileen Christothea Herodotou*, Mike Sharples, Mark Gaved, Agnes Kukulska-Hulme, Bart Rienties,  (2019) Innovative Pedagogies of the Future: An Evidence-Based Selection Institute of Educational Technology, The Open University,  Milton Keynes, United Kingdom Front. Educ., 11 October 2019 Sec. Digital Education https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00113 Whitbourne, Susan Krauss Are you having Identity Crisis Today? Retrieved February 21, 2018 from https://  www.psychologytoday.com .
  27. Widodo, H. P. (2018). The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (John I. Liontas, Ed.). : John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic