HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 22 no. 9 (2024)

Struggles and Coping Mechanisms of Secondary Seasoned Teachers in Teaching Mathematics Using Technology

Egmidio Lopez

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Given the rising integration of digital tools into educational practices in our century, it is important to comprehend how seasoned educators adjust to these developments. This qualitative research study explored the struggles and coping mechanisms of the seasoned secondary math teachers in incorporating technology into their lessons. Using phenomenological approach, fifteen seasoned math teachers from Digos City Schools Division were interviewed using the In-depth interview I to learn about their actual experiences. The results reveal the four main challenges: seasoned teachers’ technological difficulties, technological resource constraint, resistance to change, curriculum integration. Teachers use a variety of strategies to address these issues, troubleshooting skills, innovative solutions, seeking help and collaborations, and continuous professional development. The report also lists the types of assistance that school administrators should provide, professional development and learning opportunities, sharing experience and peer collaboration, resource allocation and infrastructure support, and building healthy relationships with stakeholder. The results imply that with theories of social support, resilience, and stress and coping highlight the value of specialized support systems in assisting educators in successfully navigating the challenges of teaching mathematics using technology.



References:

  1. Agayon, E., et al. (2022). Personalized teaching strategies of mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 45(2), 210- 225.
  2. Ancho, I., & Bongco, R. (2019). Exploring Filipino teachers’ professional workload. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers  and Teacher Education, 9(2), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.37134/jrpptte.vol9.no2.2.2019
  3. Anwar, M., & Siddiqui, A. (2016). Influence of computer competency on teachers’ perceptions towards ICT in education. Journal of  Education and Learning, 5(4), 255-266.
  4. Bernard, H. R. (2002). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd ed.). Alta Mira Press.
  5. Blackwell, C. K., Lauricella, A. R., Wartella, E., Robb, M., & Schomburg, R. (2013). Adoption and use of technology in early  education: The interplay of extrinsic barriers and teacher attitudes. Computers & Education, 69(2013), 310-319.
  6. Burggraaf, J. (2020). Educational technology integration: Expectations versus reality. Journal of Educational Technology Systems,  48(1), 47–https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520947997
  7. Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. California, United States of America:  SAGE Publications, Inc.
  8. Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (2nd ed.). California, United States  of America: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  9. Dai, D., & Xia, X. (2020). Whether the school self-developed e-Learning platform is more conducive to learning during the Covid-19  pandemic? Best Evidence in Chinese Education, 5(1), 569-580.globalised times (pp. 115-137). Springer,Singapore.
  10. Dela Rosa, J. (2016). Enhancing technology integration: The role of collaboration among educators. Journal of Educational Technology  & Society, 19(3), 214-226.
  11. DepEd. (2020, May 5). Official Statement. Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph/2020/05/06/official-statement-2/.
  12. Eickelmann, B., & Vennemann, M. (2017). Teachers’ attitudes and beliefs regarding ICT integration in schools. Computers &  Education, 108, 60-73.
  13. Fu, X. (2013). Professional development and attitudes toward ICT: A study of mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational  Technology Development and Exchange, 6(1), 39-56.
  14. Gallardo, A., & Juacalla, M. (2022). Institutional support and sustained performance of math teachers. International Journal of  Education, 38(3), 301-317.
  15. Garmezy, N. (1991). Resilience and vulnerability to adverse developmental outcomes associated with poverty. American Behavioral  Scientist, 34, 416–430.
  16. Ghavifekr, S., Afshari, M., & Amla Salleh, N. (2015). Management strategies for integrating ICT into educational practices.  International Journal of Instruction, 8(1), 75-98.
  17. Ghavifekr, S., et al. (2015). ICT integration in mathematics education: Examining teachers’ attitudes. International Journal of  Instruction, 8(2), 189-204.
  18. Gonzales, N. J. (n.d.). Narrative experience of seasoned teachers in teaching science using spiral progression curriculum. Bahay Pare  National High School, Candaba, Pampanga. ORCID: 0000-0002-9400-367X.
  19. Harriss, D. J., & Atkinson, G. (2015). Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2016 update. International Journal of  Sports Medicine, 36(14), 1121-1124. https://goo.gl/NSCDsu
  20. Herring, M. P., Jacob, M. L., Suveg, C., Dishman, R. K., & O’Connor, P. J. (2012). Feasibility of exercise training for the short-term  treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: A randomized controlled trial. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 81(1), 21–28.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000327898
  21. E Hsu, L. (2016). HTH Structures: Assessment. Retrieved from  http://www.hightechhigh.org/projects/?name=HTH%2Structures:%Assessment
  22. Ismail, M. I., et al. (2019). Professional development and technology integration: Impact on teachers’ attitudes. International Journal  of Technology in Education and Science, 3(1), 22-33.
  23. Janis, I. (Year). Strategies for establishing dependability between two qualitative intrinsic case studies: A reflexive thematic analysis.  Volume 34, Issue 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X211069636
  24. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2016). NMC Horizon Report: 2016 Higher Education Edition. Austin,  Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  25. Klassen, R. M., Durksen, T. L., Al Hashmi, W., Kim, L. E., Longden, K., Metsäpelto, R. L., ... & Györi, J. G. (2018). National context  and teacher characteristics: Exploring the critical non-cognitive attributes of novice teachers in four countries. Teaching and Teacher  Education, 72, 64-74.
  26. Ketchell, M. (2018). The hidden threat of teacher stress. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/the-hidden-threat-of-teacher stress-92676
  27. Konaklı, T., & Akdeniz, R. K. (2022). The Emergence, Reasons and Results of Resistance to Change in Teachers. International Journal  on Lifelong Education and Leadership, 8(1). DOI: 10.25233/ijlel.1107137. Received: April 21, 2022.
  28. Koch, T. (1994). Establishing rigour in qualitative research: The decision trail. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19, 976–986.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01177.x
  29. Kort-Butler, L. (2018). Social Support Theory. In C. J. Schreck (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Juvenile Delinquency and Justice (pp. 819- 823). Wiley-Blackwell.
  30. Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company.
  31. Lian, C., Kathiyaiah, D., Hani, F., Chanderan, V., & Md Yunus, M. (2021). “Myscene Tube”-A web channel to enhance English  speaking skills in an ESL classroom. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(3), 1141-1156.
  32. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
  33. Macaraeg, B., et al. (2021). Impact of professional development on teacher capacity-building. Journal of Teacher Education, 30(4),  455-468.
  34. MacIntyre, P. D., Gregersen, T., & Mercer, S. (2020). Language teachers’ coping strategies during the Covid-19 conversion to online  teaching: Correlations with stress, wellbeing, and negative emotions. System, 94, Article 102352.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102352
  35. Mahmud, M., & Law, A. (2022). Challenges of ICT integration in mathematics education. Journal of Educational Technology &  Society, 25(3), 45-58.
  36. Mansfield, C. F., Beltman, S., Broadley, T., & Weatherby-Fell, N. (2016). Building resilience in teacher education: An evidence informed framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 54, 77-87.
  37. McLeod, S. (2015). Psychology research ethics. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/research-ethics.html
  38. Mercader, C., & Gairn, P. (2020). Challenges faced by teachers in integrating ICT in the classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 383-403.
  39. Morrow, R., Rodriguez, A., & King, N. (2015). Colaizzi’s descriptive phenomenological method. The Psychologist, 28(8), 643-644.  ISSN 0952-8229.
  40. Nikolopoulou, K. (2022, August 11). What Is Purposive Sampling? | Definition & Examples. Revised on June 22, 2023. OECD. (2020). Educational responses to COVID-19: Summary of country responses. OECD Publishing.
  41. Omare, G., Mwalw’a, E., & Mutisya, J. (2018). Challenges in integrating ICT in education: A case of public schools in Kenya.  International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 14(3), 67–81.
  42. Paje, K., Gillis, A., & Montgomery, D. (2021). Professional development and support for effective ICT integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 29(2), 201-222.
  43. Pentang, J. T., Agayon, A. J. D., & Agayon, A. K. R. (2022). Teachers in the new normal: Challenges and coping mechanisms in  secondary schools. Journal of Humanities and Education Development, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.22161/jhed.4.1.8
  44. Redulme, M. (2017). The impact of training on teachers’ integration of digital technologies in the classroom. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 56-68.
  45. Robosa, J., et al. (2021). Innovative teaching approaches in mathematics education. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(3),  301-315.
  46. Saifudin, A., & Hamzah, M. (2021). ICT infrastructure and its impact on virtual teaching success. Journal of Online Learning and  Teaching, 17(4), 312-330.
  47. Santos, C. G. E. (2021, December 15). The quality of life of seasoned tertiary teachers engaged in distance learning approach.
  48. Semerci, A., & Aydin, M. K. (2018). Examining High School Teachers’ Attitudes towards ICT Use in Education. International Journal  of Progressive Education, 14(2), 93-105.
  49. Schoepp, K. (2005). Problems with the implementation of technology in Florida schools. International Journal of Instructional Media,  32(2), 167–172.
  50. Shields, L. B., & Mullen, C. A. (2020). Veteran Teacher Resilience: Why Do They Stay? Springer International Publishing.
  51. Shittu, A., & Shittu, S. (2015). Assessment of information and communication technology resources for effective implementation of  universal basic education in Nigeria. Creative Education, 6(18), 1905–1914. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.618193
  52. Teherani, A., Martimianakis, M. T., Stenfors-Hayes, T., & Wadhwa, A. (2015). Choosing a qualitative research approach. Journal of  Graduate Medical Education, 7(4), 669-670. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-15-00414.1
  53. Tobin, G. A., & Begley, C. M. (2004). Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48, 388– 396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03207.x
  54. Tudy, R. (2017). CJC guidelines for qualitative research. Research and Publication Office of Cor Jesu College.
  55. UNESCO. (2020). Education in a post-COVID world: Nine ideas for public action. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural  Organization.
  56. Vasilateanu, A., & Casaru, C. (2015). Anonymity in health-oriented social networks. Procedia Computer Science, 64, 483-490.  https://goo.gl/oJv8Wc
  57. Vatanartiran, S., & Karadeniz, T. (2015). Preschool teachers’ views on the use of technology in education. International Journal of  Social Science, 31(2), 129–136.
  58. Wang, L., Xu, H., & Chan, K. (2020). Math teachers’ perspectives on technology integration. Educational Technology Research and  Development, 68, 75-92.
  59. White, M. A., & McCallum, F. (2020). Responding to teacher quality through an evidence-informed wellbeing framework for initial  teacher education.