Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 39 no. 2 (2025)

Management Practices, Teachers’ Competence, and Performance of Non-School Based Management (SBM) Schools in Region XII

Annalee Viernes

Discipline: management studies

 

Abstract:

This study explores the management practices of school heads, teachers’ competence and performance of Non-School Based Management (SBM) schools in Region XII. Using a descriptive-correlational design with data triangulation to examine the management practices, teachers’ competence, and performance of non-School-Based Management (SBM) schools in Region XII schools, data from 26 school heads and 316 teachers, utilizing complete enumeration were collected. Data were analyzed using percentages, means, standard deviations and revealed that school heads’ management practices were rated outstanding, demonstrating effective leadership. Teachers’ competence was rated very satisfactory, highlighting the need for continuous professional development. The performance level of non-SBM schools was rated good/developing, indicating they are in the developmental phase of school-based management. Correlation analysis found no significant relationship between school heads’ management practices and school performance, nor between teachers’ competence and school performance.



References:

  1. Abulencia, A. S. (2012). Capacity-building efforts for effective school-based management implementation in the Philippines: Challenges and opportunities. Philippine Journal of Educational Administration, 10(2), 45–60.
  2. Aquino, C. J. C. (2022). Enhancing access to education through inclusive environments and community outreach programs. Philippine Journal of Educational Access, 10(1), 23–45.
  3. Cabardo, J. R. (2016). Stakeholders’ participation in the school-based management as an effective mechanism toward achieving quality education. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 7(1), 52–59.
  4. Camacho, D. A., & Farrales, M. T. (2019). Implementation of school-based management as perceived by the school governing council in the Philippines. International Journal of Research Publications, 3(1), 1–8.
  5. Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547
  6. Collie, R. J., & Martin, A. J. (2017). Teachers’ sense of adaptability: Examining links with perceived autonomy support, organizational support, and job satisfaction. Educational Psychology, 37(6), 793–811.
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2019). Demographic factors and correlational analysis in educational research. SAGE Publications.
  8. Darling-Hammond, L. (2020). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 28, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.5116
  9. Day, C. (2020). Professional learning: Collective responsibility and individual agency. In C. Day & D. Gurr (Eds.), Leading Schools Successfully: Stories from the Field (pp. 97–111). Routledge.
  10. Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863
  11. Department of Education (DepEd). (2017). Guidelines on community engagement in non-SBM schools: Challenges and opportunities for improved outcomes. DepEd Memorandum No. 45, s. 2015.
  12. Department of Education (DepEd). (2017). National adoption and implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST). DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2017.
  13. Department of Education. (2016). Guidelines on the implementation of school-based management. DepEd Order No. 45, s. 2015.
  14. Fassett, K., & Kallio, T. (2022). Statistical tools for understanding trends: Mean and standard deviation analysis. International Journal of Statistical Studies, 20(1), 45–67.
  15. Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408–1416. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2281
  16. Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2019). Teacher leadership and organizational capacity: A study in contrasting school contexts. International Journal of Teacher Leadership, 10(1), 56–77.
  17. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
  18. Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2019). How school leadership influences student learning: A test of “the four paths model.” Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(4), 606–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18769048
  19. Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2019). The impact of school leadership on student outcomes: A meta-analysis of research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(3), 505–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18821839
  20. Leithwood, K., Sun, J., & Pollock, K. (2020). How school leadership influences student learning: Toward a reconciliation of divergent findings. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(4), 611–641.
  21. López, M., García, R., & Pérez, J. (2021). Community engagement in educational resource management: A systematic review. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(4), 540–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220911234
  22. Marzano, R. J., & Waters, T. (2018). School leadership that works: From research to results. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  23. Mazumdar, S. (2024). Ethical principles in research: Building authenticity and public trust. Journal of Research Ethics, 18(2), 45–67.
  24. Mustafa, M., & Othman, N. (2022). The effect of safe and supportive work environment on teachers’ morale. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(1), 1244–1251.
  25. Razak, N., Ahmad, R., & Hassan, S. (2023). Positive behavioral management strategies and their effects on student engagement. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 15(2), 112–130.
  26. Reimers, F. M., & Chung, C. K. (2022). Empowering schools for localized educational management: Contemporary perspectives. Harvard University Press.
  27. Resnik, D. (2022). Ethical standards in scientific research: Preventing harm and fostering integrity. Journal of Research Ethics, 16(3), 34–56.
  28. Sun, J., & Leithwood, K. (2017). Assessing the impact of community engagement on school outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(5), 703–738.
  29. Wilson, V. (2014). Research methods for understanding complex issues: Semi-structured interviews as a tool for qualitative inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Studies, 12(4), 67–89.
  30. World Bank & AusAID. (2014). Making education work: Strengthening school-based management in urban areas. World Bank Publications.
  31. World Bank. (2021). What is school-based management? Retrieved from World Bank Documents. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(5), 681–706.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic