Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 39 no. 4 (2025)

Level of Practices on Teaching Competencies Among the Teachers in Malaybalay City Central School

Aireen Banderado | Larry Labay

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study explored the relationship between the extent of teaching competency practices among educators, focusing on five key areas: instructional materials, learning resources, lesson planning, teaching delivery, and instructional strategies. The demographic analysis showed that most respondents were middle-aged, predominantly female, with moderate years of teaching experience. They specialized in elementary education and typically belonged to financially stable, medium-sized households. These characteristics, while informative, did not significantly influence the respondents’ teaching competencies. Results revealed that teachers consistently demonstrated a high level of proficiency in all five competency areas. They were able to design coherent, engaging lessons aligned with learning objectives, utilizing creative strategies to promote student participation and comprehension. Despite this strong performance, opportunities remain for growth, particularly in contextualizing instructional materials and diversifying teaching techniques to address varied learner needs. Statistical analysis showed no significant correlation between the teachers' demographic profiles and their level of competency, suggesting that personal attributes such as age, gender, years of service, income, and household size do not directly impact teaching effectiveness. Instead, the findings support that professional training, continuous development, and hands-on experience are more influential in shaping effective teaching practices. In conclusion, this research underscores the importance of sustained professional growth and the value of investing in teacher development programs. Future studies are encouraged to examine other factors affecting teaching performance, including motivation, institutional support, and access to ongoing training opportunities.



References:

  1. Allington, R. L. (2019). What matters for struggling readers: Designing research-based programs.
  2. Burtch, B. (2018). Do male and female teachers have different professional development needs? Journal of Educational Research, 111(5), 574–579.
  3. Center for the Study of Child Care Employment (2008). Pediatric educational abilities: an academic analysis of existing best practices and a public feedback system for next steps in California. Berkeley, California: Laboratory for Investigation of Early Childhood Job Creation, Department for Research on Labor and Employment at the University of California, Berkeley.
  4. Chen, J. (2012). A study of the implementation of learner-centered instruction in elementary English classrooms. English Language Teaching, 5(6), 129–143.
  5. Cochran-Smith, M., Cannady, M., McEachern, K., Terrell, D. G., Barnatt, J., & McCallum, C. (2016). Seeing teacher education through the policy lens: The case of the US. Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(5), 525–542.
  6. Coldevin, G., Dalland, C., & Ottestad, G. (2018). Teachers’ use of digital tools and resources in Norwegian K-12 schools. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 13(3), 190–205.
  7. Collected articles on computer games, education, and reading. Peter Lang. Gikas, J., and Grant, M. M. (2017). Mobile technology in higher educational institutions: Undergraduate viewpoints on studying using mobile devices, phones, and online communities. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18–26.
  8. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2015). Educating educators towards an ever-changing outside world: What they should know and be capable of doing. John Wiley and Sons.
  9. Darling-Hammond, L., & Sykes, G. (2018). Education as an occupational career: Lectures on preparation for teaching and career development. The Phi Delta Kappan, 99(6), 15-20.
  10. Dee, T. S. (2017). The effects of gender composition in the teacher workforce on student achievement and teacher behavior. Economics of Education Review, pp. 56, 125–141.
  11. Deped Order no. 47, s. 2016, Omnibus Policy on Kindergarten Education, Department of Education – Issuances
  12. Emdin, C. (2016). Regarding white people who educate in the immediate vicinity, and everyone else too: Reality pedagogy and urban education. Beacon Press.
  13. Epstein, J. L., & Galindo, C. (2010). Making connections between family involvement research and practice. Handbook of research on schools, schooling, and human development, pp. 550–564.
  14. Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Tondeur, J., & J, C. (2012). The views of educators and usage of technology to promote modern education and instruction. Global Education Journal of Educational Technology, 7(2), 136-142.
  15. Farassi, M. S. (2015). Effectiveness of phonics instruction on improving decoding skills among students with reading difficulties. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 2(5), 116-124.
  16. Fasasi, Y. A. (2015). Teachers’ use of supplementary materials influences students’ academic performance in social studies. The International Review of Academic Investigation in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 5 (2), 172-181.
  17. Ganske, K. (2018). Language adventures are assessment-guided phonetics, pronunciation, and language lessons. Guilford Publications.
  18. Hattie, J. (2019). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 1600 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
  19. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2017). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
  20. Holt, N. L., & Gaultney, J. F. (2019). Marital status and occupational performance. International Journal of Stress Management, 18(3), 255-271.
  21. Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2015). The influence of introduction and mentorship programs for new instructors: This is a critical analysis of the study in question. Review of Educational Research 81(2): 201-233.
  22. Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2019). The charitable activities education: Instructors’ interpersonal and intellectual competency about student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491–525.
  23. Johnson, R., & Williams, L. (2017). Succession planning in education: Strategies for knowledge transfer. Educational Leadership Review, 22(4), 56–73.
  24. Klassen, R. M., and Chiu, M. M. (2016). The previous professional commitment and determination to discontinue practice and preservice teachers: Influence of self-efficacy, job stress, and teaching context. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(2), 114-129.
  25. Klassen, R. M., Wilson, E., Siu, A. F., Hannok, W., Wong, M. W., Wongsri, N., ...& Krawchuk, L. L. (2017). Preliminary educators’ workplace anxiety, self-confidence, and career dedication across four nations. European Journal of Psychology in Educational Institutions, 27(4), 385-405.
  26. Kucirkova, N., Rowsell, J., & Falloon, G. (2019). Young children’s multimodal authoring with technology. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 19(1), 3–6.
  27. Neuman, S. B., & Roskos, K. (2019). Another environmental study encompassing four neighborhoods examines print distribution in middle- and lower-income populations. Reading Research Quarterly 48(3), 275-295.
  28. Otieno, T., & Otiende, J. (2018). Impact of instructional materials on learners’ outcomes in mathematics in public primary schools in Rachuonyo North Sub-County, Kenya. The International Review of Educational and Investigation, 6 (8), 111-124. Parette, H.P.,
  29. Prince, M. (2014). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.
  30. Quesenberry, A.C., and Blum, C. (2015). Effective use of instructional materials in inclusive classrooms. Institute of Scholarship on Children with Special Needs, 15(3), 187–197.
  31. Rauch, F.; Steiner, R. Competences for education for sustainable development in teacher education. Center Educ. Policy Stud. J. 201
  32. Sadker, D., & Sadker, M. (2016). Equal opportunities for women in the learning environment: An incomplete agenda. New York: Teachers College Press.
  33. Smith, A., & Johnson, B. (2018). The impact of teacher age on attitudes toward technology integration. Association about Electronic Learning in Teaching and Learning, 34(4), 255–265.
  34. Smith, P., & Jones, Q. (2018). Innovative teaching methods and technological fluency among younger teachers. Educational Technology Journal, 36(1), 45–58          
  35. Spodek, B. (ed.)(1984). Professionalism and the Early Childhood Practitioner, New
  36. Stout, J. G., & Dasgupta, N. (2011). When he does not, I mean you succeed: Gender-exclusive terminology is ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Newsletter, 37(6), 757–769.
  37. Torres-Ramos, S., Fajardo-Robledo, N., Pérez-Carrillo, L., Castillo-Cruz, C., Rodríguez-Betancourt, V., & Neri-Cortés, C. (2021). Mentors as Ambassadors in STEM fields: Possible Advantages. Sustainable development, 2013(23), 12938. .Sexual orientation and the scientific method: How academic ratio contributes to the sex gap. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(3), 1101-1144.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic