Stakeholders’ Assessment of the Status, Challenges, and Sustainability of Internationalization of China Education Group: Inputs to an Enhanced Development Plan
Mingmin Zou | Rowena M. Libo-on
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
This study investigates the multifaceted dimensions of internationalization in the China Education Group (CEG) through the lens of 369 stakeholders, encompassing students, faculty, and administrators. Anchored in a quantitative design and guided by Knight’s internationalization model, the research utilized structured questionnaires to examine stakeholders' demographic profiles and their assessments of the status, challenges, and sustainability of internationalization across CEG institutions. Results revealed a moderately perceived level of institutional commitment, faculty engagement, and resource allocation, with significant variance based on stakeholder characteristics such as sex, nationality, and educational attainment. Key barriers identified include regulatory complexities, financial constraints, and infrastructure limitations rated particularly high among female, foreign, and postgraduate stakeholders. While overall perceptions of sustainability were neutral, subgroups with advanced academic and professional backgrounds expressed greater optimism, particularly in areas related to academic excellence and leadership adaptability. The findings informed the development of a strategic enhancement plan focusing on integrated governance, cross-cultural competence, technological advancement, and stakeholder-responsive frameworks. The study contributes to the discourse on global higher education policy by offering context-sensitive insights into institutional internationalization and advancing stakeholder-driven development strategies.
References:
- Alsharari, N. M. (2020). Internationalization market and higher education field: institutional perspectives. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(2), 315-334.
- Amaro de Matos, J., Pina e Cunha, M., & Falcao de Berredo, R. (2022). Leading university internationalisation: The future of Euro‐Chinese academic cooperation. European Journal of Education, 57(1), 65-77.
- Armas, K. L., & Jugo, R. R. (2024). Strategic development planning for global integration: A comprehensive framework for state universities in the Philippines. International Review of Management and Marketing, 14(6), 167-177.
- De Wit, H., & Altbach, P. G. (2021). Internationalization in higher education: global trends and recommendations for its future. In Higher education in thenext decade (pp. 303-325). Brill.
- Garwe, E. C., & Thondhlana, J. (2022). Making internationalization of higher education a national strategic focus. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(1), 521-538.
- Hong, M. (2020). A comparative study of the internationalization of higher education policy in Australia and China (2008–2015). Studies in Higher Education, 45(4), 768-779.
- Knight, J. (2005). An internationalization model: responding to new realities and challenges. Higher education in Latin America: The international dimension, 1-38.
- Lai, N. Y. G., Zhang, Y., Wong, K. H., Yu, L. J., & Kang, H. S. (2023, November). Sustainability Reporting and Sharing on Websites of Sino-Foreign Cooperative Universities. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
- Li, J. (2021). “Four branches” of internationalization of higher education in China: A policy retrospective analysis. Springer Nature.
- Li, J., & Xue, E. (2022). Exploring high-quality institutional internationalization for higher education sustainability in China: Evidence from stakeholders. Sustainability, 14(13), 7572.
- Streefkerk, R. (2019). Qualitative vs. quantitative research. Scribbr. Scribbr. Retrieved March, 16, 2022.
- Yousif, M. M. (2021). EXAMINING UNIVERSITY STAKEHOLDERS’ PERCEPTION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERNATIONALIZATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS IN THE UAE.
- Zinchenko, V. V. (2020). Global institutional transformations and the prospects of sustainable development of society in the context of the internationalization of higher education. Перспективы науки и образования, (2), 10-18.