Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 39 no. 6 (2025)

Technology-Enabled Public Participation: Opportunities and Challenges of Participatory Research

Jimmy Bernabe Maming | Cherry C. Escarilla | Elvis Lesly Taño-An | Naregin Fare

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study explores the dynamics of community participation by examining the shift from conventional to digital technology-powered processes. Internet-based platforms promise advanced and comprehensive procedures. However, the paradox remains in its way of mentioning the digital divide, privacy issues, and bias of algorithms and machine learning (ML) that demands an afterthought. This paper examines the advantages of online technologies to liberalize community engagements, level up information gathering and interpretations, encourage cooperation and networks, and capitalize on real-time responses. It focuses on ethical matters like the protection and safety of the respondents, the bias of the algorithmic system, and power crescendos that require attention and investigation. Conversely, the chapter navigates the emerging practices for comprehensive and sound research practices, particularly in participatory research, by developing trust and openness, cultivating skilled labor, and tackling best practices in the virtual world, AI, and citizen science. Through the narrative review, challenges and opportunities of digital technology tools were carefully explored for community engagements intended to contribute to the advancements of holistic, equitable, and effective community participation methods in policy formulation and decision-making processes.



References:

  1. Abiddin, N. Z., Ismail, N., & Hashim, N. (2022). Digital literacy program: A systematic review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 17(1), 1-18.
  2. Aghdam, H. H., Amini, S., & Mohammadi, M. (2022). A comprehensive survey on universal internet access: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 24(2), 1189- 1219.
  3. Alfonsi, L., & Berliri, M. (2021). Ethics in the age of artificial intelligence: Towards a framework for responsible AI. AI & Society, 36(3), 619-631.
  4. Amann, S. T. (2017). Digital health and the future of medicine. Science, 357(6346), 8-9.
  5. Aragonès, E., & Sánchez-Pagés, S. (2005). Communication and democracy: A theoretical framework. Information, Communication & Society, 8(1), 7-32.
  6. Bakshi, A., & Bakshi, P. (2018). Machine learning with Python. Packt Publishing.
  7. Blanck, M. (2008). Universal design: The principles and practice of inclusive design. Elsevier.
  8. Berigüete, A., Martín-López, B., & Marcos, J. (2024). Virtual and augmented reality in citizen science: A review. Environmental Modelling & Software, 177, 106203.
  9. Callegaro, M., Berti, S., & Arcuri, A. (2014). Online communities and social research: Methodological challenges and opportunities. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 15(1), Art. 37.
  10. Charles, W. M., & Magtanong, R. (2022). Ethical considerations in online research: A review and discussion. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21(1), 1-14.
  11. Chilvers, J., & Kearnes, M. (2020). Reconstructing engagement: Towards a more democratic and inclusive public sphere. Policy & Politics, 48(2), 225-242.
  12. Ciampaglia, G., Vosoughi, S., & Zollo, F. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1150.
  13. Combe, A. (2015). Ethics and research with human participants: A review. Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(11), 1106-1111.
  14. Crowcroft, J., Levis, P., Mulligan, J., & Nguyen, K. (2014). The challenges of data for development. IEEE Internet Computing, 18(1), 18-25.
  15. Davies, J. (2019). Public participation and engagement: A review of the literature. Journal of Public Health, 41(3), 464-471.
  16. Desouza, K. C., & Bhagwatwar, A. (2014). E-governance: A review of literature. International Journal of Computer Applications, 97(11), 33-39.
  17. Dijk, J. A. G. (2017). The digital divide: The unequal distribution of information and knowledge in the information society. Sage.
  18. Faraj, S., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (2011). The social impact of technology. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 341-360.
  19. Fernandes, B., & Graglia, M. (2024). Addressing algorithmic bias in machine learning: A review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 47(1), 1-46.
  20. Foley, J., & Ferri, B. J. (2012). The digital divide: The persistence of inequality in the information age. MIT Press.
  21. Fritz, S., See, L., & Koch, E. (2017). Citizen science: Concepts, methods, and potential. PLOS Biology, 15(3), e2001380.
  22. Fu, K., Chen, Y., & Liu, X. (2020). Fairness in artificial intelligence: A review. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 35(3), 63-76.
  23. Garg, P., Gupta, S., & Sharma, A. (2024). Data security and privacy in the era of big data: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102537.
  24. Gorski, P. C. (2005). The digital divide: Race, writing, and resistance in American schools. Teachers College Press.
  25. Gupta, S. (2015). Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Network, IEEE, 29(4), 8-16.
  26. Haas, R., & Hendrickson, C. (1991). Pavement management systems. McGraw-Hill.
  27. Han, S., Oh, S. W., & Kim, H. J. (2021). Building trust in community-engaged research: A framework for action. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 7234.
  28. Hakala, K., Leino, T., & Järvinen, A. (2020). Narrative review: A critical and integrative approach to qualitative research synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(1), 142-151.
  29. Hara, N., & Sanfilippo, M. (2016). The impact of social media on work: A review of the literature. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(S1), S1-S21.
  30. Holt, T. J. (2015). Using GPS data to study the built environment and human behavior. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 5, 105-110.
  31. Hope, A. (2016). Digital media and participatory research: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1), Art. 38.
  32. Jacobs, J. (2024). Evaluating information credibility in the digital age: A critical review. 1 Information & Learning Science, 4(1), 1-10.
  33. Johnson, C. A., Moreland, N., & Miller, C. A. (2019). Social media and mental health: A critical review.
  34. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 32(2), 119-124.
  35. Jones, M. (2004). Narrative inquiry in health sciences research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 26(2), 145-157.
  36. Khetarpal, N. (2014). ICT for inclusive development: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Information Management, 34(3), 391-396.
  37. Kloby, J., & Sadeghi, A. (2013). E-democracy and citizen participation: A review of the literature. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 419-433.
  38. Kyza, E., & Varda, A. (2019). Trust in online information: A review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 105-117.
  39. Loignon, C., Desrosiers, J., & Nadeau, S. (2021). Co-creating digital platforms with marginalized groups: A review of the literature. Journal of Community Informatics, 17(1), 1-17.
  40. Longo, P. (2017). The digital divide and its impact on education: A review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-22.
  41. Manikam, R., Singh, P., & Singh, R. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the use of digital technologies in education: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1115-1141.
  42. Mazumdar, S., Mazumdar, A., & Rai, A. K. (2018). Citizen science: A review. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 77(1), 10-17.
  43. McDavitt, K., Shonkoff, J. P., & Garner, A. S. (2016). Building trust in community-engaged research: A framework for action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 57(1-2), 13-25.
  44. McNutt, K. (2014). Social media and e-government: Challenges and opportunities. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 189-196.
  45. Mohd Naved, M. (2022). A comprehensive review of artificial intelligence and machine learning. Journal of Big Data, 9(1), 1-18.
  46. Montgomery, J. M. (2018). How social media is changing the way we live: The promise and peril of an always-on world. Yale University Press.
  47. Muller, C., Hecker, S., Leuschner, C., & Jürgens, C. (2015). Citizen science: Contribution to open innovation. Research Policy, 44(10), 1748-1760.
  48. Nazer, B., Khan, M. A., & Iqbal, M. W. (2023). Algorithmic bias and discrimination in artificial intelligence: A comprehensive review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 46(1), 1-46.
  49. Newman, G. E., Crutzen, R., & Lambin, E. F. (2012). The emergence of citizen science: Scientific research by
  50. Nind, M. (2009). Participatory research methods. Sage Publications.
  51. Phillips, N., McRobbie, A., & Tyler, M. (2024). Art and social change: A critical introduction. Bloomsbury Academic.
  52. Richardson, L. (2014). Handbook of qualitative research methods for public health. Routledge.
  53. Rowe, G., & Gammack, J. (2004). E-democracy and digital divide. Information, Communication & Society, 7(3), 318-339.
  54. Rudan, D., & Rudan, J. (2014). E-democracy and citizen participation: A review. Journal of Economic and Social Research, 16(1), 1-18.
  55. Schensul, J. J. (2002). Participatory action research: Methodological issues in community-based participatory research. Health Education & Behavior, 29(2), 181-199.
  56. Seymour, E. (2001). Access for all: Designing inclusive technology. Microsoft Press.
  57. Sukhera, M. (2022a). Narrative review: A comprehensive and critical appraisal. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 16(1), 1-4.
  58. Sukhera, M. (2022b). Narrative review: A critical appraisal. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 16(1), 1-4.
  59. Tambouris, E., Antoniou, C., & Tsakonas, V. (2007). E-democracy: A review of e-participation and online deliberation. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 230-249.
  60. Thakur, R. (2009). E-governance: Concepts and practices. IGI Global.
  61. Vavekanand, S., & Dayanand, K. (2024). Impact of digital divide on agricultural development in India: A review. International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 10(1), 1-10.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic