The Interplay of Pre-Service Teachers’ Mathematical Vocabulary and their Problem-Solving Performance
Real Baguin | Rosanna Tagupa | Ian Isidore Lomod | Lodie Aron | Chantal Devilleres
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
This study examined the mathematical vocabulary and problem-solving performance of pre-service mathematics
teachers at Bohol Island State University – Bilar Campus during the academic year 2023-2024. Utilizing descriptivecorrelational methods, data were collected on respondents' sex, year level, mathematical vocabulary, and problemsolving performance. Pilot testing was conducted with third-year Bachelor of Science in Agricultural and Biosystems
Engineering (BSABE) students to validate the test questionnaires through item analysis, leading to their refinement
and finalization. The results revealed that respondents' mathematical vocabulary was assessed as 'Poor,' and their
problem-solving performance was deemed 'Failed.' A significant relationship was found between mathematical
vocabulary and problem-solving performance, but no significant difference was observed with sex. Year level
significantly affected both mathematical vocabulary and problem-solving performance. Aligned with the United
Nations Sustainable Development Goal 4, which aims to ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote
lifelong learning opportunities for all, this study highlights the critical need to enhance mathematical vocabulary to
improve problem-solving skills among future educators. The study recommends strategies for instructors and
administrators to support this goal, thereby contributing to the development of high-quality education standards.
Future research may replicate the study to verify the results and explore additional factors such as learning styles and
students' General Weighted Average. By addressing these educational challenges, the research supports SDG 4's target
of substantially increasing the number of youth and adults who have relevant skills for employment, decent jobs, and
entrepreneurship by 2030
References:
- AlAli, R., Wardat, Y., Helali, M. M., & Alshraifin, N. (2024). Understanding word problems: Pre-service math teacher proficiency. Environment & Social Psychology, 9(7). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i7.2812
- Bulayi, M. (2020). Gender differences in the language of mathematics in secondary schools. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 3(1), 36-42. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v3i1.170
- Egodawatte, G. (2010). A rubric to self-assess and peer-assess mathematical problem-solving tasks of college students. Volume 3(1).
- Ganley, C. M., & Lubienski, S. T. (2016). Mathematics confidence, interest, and performance: Examining gender patterns and reciprocal relations. Learning and Individual Differences, 47(1-2), 182-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.01.002
- Mefoh, P., Nwoke, M. B., Chukwuorji, J. B., & Chijioke, A. O. (2017). Effect of cognitive style and gender on adolescents’ problem-solving ability. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 25, 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.03.002
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and interpretations. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
- Paul J. Riccomini, Gregory W. Smith, Elizabeth M. Hughes & Karen M. Fries (2015). The Language of Mathematics: The Importance of Teaching and Learning Mathematical Vocabulary. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 31:3, 235-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2015.1030995
- Peng, P., & Lin, X. (2018). The relation between mathematics vocabulary and mathematics performance among fourth graders. Learning and Individual Differences, 65, 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.11.006
- Powell, S. R., Driver, M. K., Roberts, G., & Fall, A.-M. (2017). An analysis of the mathematics vocabulary knowledge of third- and fifth-grade students: Connections to general vocabulary and mathematics computation. Learning and Individual Differences, 57, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.05.011
- Ramirez, N. K., Sales, J. G., & Tindowen, D. J. (2019). Struggles in translating math word problems: Comprehension, vocabulary, and operational errors among second-year education students. Journal of Humanities and Education Development (JHED), 1(1), 1-15. https://theshillonga.com/index.php/jhed
- Riccomini, P. J., Smith, G. W., Hughes, E., & Fries, K. (2015). The language of mathematics: The importance of teaching and learning mathematical vocabulary. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 31(3), 235-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2015.1030995
- Rohid, N., Suryaman, & Rusmawati, R. D. (2019). Students’ mathematical communication skills (MCS) in solving mathematics problems: A case in Indonesian context. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2019.423a
- Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical Problem Solving. New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-05012-8
- Schoenfeld, A. H. (Ed.). (1987). Cognitive science and mathematics education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Sinaga, B., Sitorus, J., & Situmeang, T. (2023). The influence of students’ problem-solving understanding and results of students’ mathematics learning. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1088556
- Sintema, E. J., & Jita, T. (2022). Gender differences in high school students’ beliefs about mathematical problem solving. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(10), 395-417. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.10.22
- Thompson, A. (2014). Dual process theory. In ScienceDirect Topics. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/psychology/dual-process-theory
- Unson, J. C. P. (2021). Vocabulary and identification of information: Difficulties and challenges in word problems solving. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM), 9(8), 338-357. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v9i08.02.
- Wüstenberg, S., Greiff, S., Molnár, G., & Funke, J. (2014). Cross-national gender differences in complex problem solving and their determinants. Learning and Individual Differences, 29, 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.006