Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 23 no. 3 (2024)

Attitude Towards Computer Use and Motivation in Learning Physical Education among Junior High School Students: Basis for a Development Plan

Ricky Padawan | Mona L. Laya

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study determined the influence of attitude towards computer use and motivation in learning physical education among junior high school students. Stratified random sampling was used in choosing the schools and simple random sampling in choosing respondents from secondary schools of Lupon West District. Validated and reliability tested survey questionnaires were used to gather data. Mean, standard deviation, Pearson Product Moment Correlation, and linear regression were among the statistical tools used. The results revealed that students had a high level of attitude towards computer use and motivation in learning physical education. Likewise, there was a significant relationship between attitude towards computer use and motivation in learning physical education among junior high school students. Moreover, perceived usefulness and behavioral intention of attitude towards computer significantly influence motivation in learning physical education. However, the other indicators of attitude towards computer use namely affective component and perceived control were not predictors of students motivation in learning physical education. Based on the findings, proposed development plan was made.



References:

  1. Balacuit, C. & Inabangan, J. (2019). Influence of motivation towards the academic performance in games and sports among  BSEdMAPEH interns in SDSSU-main campus. Retrieved on June 21, 2022 from https://bit.ly/3SYN0d0
  2. Beatty, K. A. (2018). Student engagement in online learning: What works and why. ASHE Higher Education Report, 40(6), 1–114.  doi:10.1002/aehe.20018
  3. Butler, J. & Mautz, I. (2016). Increasing the success of online students. Inquiry: The Journal of the Virginia Community Colleges,  13(1), 36–44.
  4. Carnegie Mellon University (2022). Teaching Excellence and Educational Innovation. Eberly Center. Retrieved from  https://bit.ly/3Nq8752
  5. Certy, J. (2018). Effects of reflection type in the here and now mobile learning environment. British Journal of Educational Technology,  47(5), 932–944. doi:10.1111/bjet.12327
  6. Corsino, S., Lim, R. & Reyes, K. (2022). The Correlates of Language Learning Motivation of Senior High School Students. Journal  of World Englishes and Educational Practices. Journal Homepage: www.al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jweep. Retrieved on October  18, 2022 from https://bit.ly/3g7nIuT
  7. Cruz, A., Kim, M. & Kim, H. (2021). Physical Education Attitude of Adolescent Students in the Philippines: Importance of Curriculum  and Teacher Sex and Behaviors. Retrieved on June 20, 2022 from https://bit.ly/3CDg6t9
  8. Dunkel, L. (2018). How interactive are your distance courses? A rubric for assessing interaction in distance learning. Online Journal  of Distance Learning Administration, 3(2). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer32/roblyer32.html
  9. Forcier, M. D. (2016). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the  Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2).
  10. Gallagher, K. (2020). Technology and Its Impact on Physical Education. Northwestern College – Orange City. Master’s Theses  & Capstone Projects. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3sSXd02
  11. Graham, L. (2018). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Granng, R. (2017). Navigating the bumpy road to student-centered instruction. College Teaching, 44(2).
  12. Hood, N. (2022). What is self-efficacy? 6 strategies for promoting student self-efficacy in your teaching. Retrieved on June 27, 2022  from https://bit.ly/3D3EAM6
  13. Jeong, H., & So, W. (2020). Difficulties of Online Physical Education Classes in Middle and High School and an Efficient Opera  Plan to Address Them. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3Otc7lA
  14. Kenning, S., & Kenning, M. (2018). Sharing the journey of facilitator and learner: Online pedagogy in practice. Journal of Learning  Design, 3(1), 11–20.
  15. LaMorte, W. (2019). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Behavioral Change Models. Retrieved on June 27, 2022 from  https://bit.ly/3VBuBVB
  16. Little, D. L. (2019). Designing and orchestrating online discussions. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(3). Livingston, R. (2020). Why Videos are Important in Education. Retrieved on June 27, 2022 from https://bit.ly/3owooym
  17. Ly, V., Wang, K., Bhanji, J. & Delgado, M. (2022). A Reward-Based Framework of Perceived Control.Retrieved on June 27, 2022  from https://bit.ly/3yPejie
  18. McCormack, D. (2022). Self-regulation in children and teenagers. What is self-regulation? Retrieved on August 1, 2022 from  https://bit.ly/3s6XDyX
  19. McVicker, D. (2022). How Technology Changes Physical Education Classes. Retrieved on June 24, 2022 from https://bit.ly/3yO2ubQ Moor, E. (2020). Main Idea and Details and Tips to Teach It. Retrieved on April 24, 2023 from https://bit.ly/3N90VNZ
  20. Nur, L., Suherman, A., Subarjah, H. & Budiana, D. (2022). Motivation in Learning Physical Education for Junior High School  Students in Indonesia. Retrieved on June 27, 2022 from https://bit.ly/3Txxa9A
  21. Rabinowitz, V. & Glaser, S. (2018). Comparing online and face-to-face teaching and learning. Journal on Excellence in College  Teaching, 21(3), 95–108.
  22. Shen, B., Wingert, R., Li, W., Sun, H. & Rukavina, P. (2010). An Amotivation Model in Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in  Physical Education, 2010, 29, 72-84. Retrieved on June 20, 2022 from https://bit.ly/3T67gKy
  23. Tahar, A., Riyadh, H., Sofyani, H. & Purnomo, W. (2020). Perceived Ease of Use, Percived Usefulness, Perceived Security and  Intention to Use E-Filing: The Role of Technology Readiness. Korea Distribution Science Association. Retrieved on June 27, 2022  from https://bit.ly/3EXUDfI
  24. Taylor, J. V. (2017). Online technologies for engaged learning: A meaningful synthesis for educators. The Quarterly Review of  Distance Education, 12(2).
  25. Thangarajathi, S. (2020). Technology for Enhancing Students Creativity. Journal of Information and Computational Science. Retrieved  from https://bit.ly/3PybWaa
  26. Truchot, D. (2022). Ipsos Encyclopedia – Affective Component. Retrieved on June 27, 2022 from https://bit.ly/3s1Pdsq
  27. White, B. C. (2016). Effective online instructional and assessment strategies. American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 117– 132. doi:10.1080/08923640701341653 
  28. Xiong, Y., Sun, X., Liu, X., Wang, P. & Zheng, B. (2022). The Influence of Self-Efficacy and Work Input on Physical Education  Teachers’ Creative Teaching. Retrieved on June 27, 2022 from https://bit.ly/3TgeCL5

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic