Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 40 no. 4 (2025)

Competence and Adversity Quotient of Teachers in Katangawan District: Basis for Professional Development Program

Belvic Llamas | Ildefonso E. Libdan | Cornelio R. Rollo | Jay D. Buscano

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

In a rapidly evolving landscape of education, teachers are expected to demonstrate professional competence and the ability to adapt and thrive in different challenges. As teachers face different curricula, diverse learners' needs, and institutional demands, the relationship between Competence and Adversity Quotient is vital. This study aimed to determine the level of the Philippine Professional Standard for Teachers' Competence and Adversity Quotient of teachers in Katangawan District. It employed an explanatory-sequential mixed method to investigate the PPST Competence of teachers in terms of content knowledge and pedagogy, learning environment and diversity of learners, curriculum and planning, assessment and reporting, and the Adversity Quotient of teachers in terms of control, ownership, reach, and endurance in six schools. Quantitative findings indicated that the teachers demonstrated strong proficiency in PPST areas. The Adversity Quotient indicated that they could handle moderate levels of adversity and need support to strengthen their persistence and control over challenging situations. A post-hoc analysis using Dunn’s Test was conducted to determine specific group differences, following the finding of a significant variation in the Adversity Quotient of teachers across schools. Additionally, Spearman's rank correlation was employed to examine the relationship between teachers’ PPST Competence and their Adversity Quotient. The result revealed that there was a significant relationship between the two variables. Additionally, qualitative data indicated that the teachers described their PPST Competence through enhancing pedagogical practices, designing and managing an effective learning environment, effective lesson planning and instructional design, and improving assessment and feedback in learning. Likewise, teachers see their Adversity Quotient through resilient and collaborative adaptation to challenges, enhancing teaching practices for holistic educational growth, navigating challenges through growth, opportunity, and emotional adaptability, and fostering student success through commitment and holistic support. It is recommended to establish a monitoring and feedback system to assess the effectiveness of the intervention plan.



References:

  1. Ablaña, M. V. B., Isidro, D. J., & Cabrera, G. A. (2015). Correlation between adversity quotient and job performance of LGU employees of Tayabas City: input to effective public personnel management. College of Arts and Science, 11, 1-75.
  2. Alsubaie, M. A. (2016). Curriculum development: teacher involvement in curriculum development. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 106-107.
  3. Amistouso, D. & Rollo, C. (2018). Priority Development and Perspective of Teachers in Conel District: Basis for School Learning Action Cell Framework Enhancement in The City Schools Division Offices in General Santos City.
  4. Anju, J., & Sahoo, J. (2023). Adversity quotient: A review of related literature. International Journal of Scientific Research in Modern Science and Technology, 2(10), 26-32.
  5. Ayala, J. C., & Manzano, G. 2014. The resilience of entrepreneurs. Influence on the success of the business. A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 42(1): 126-135.
  6. Baroa, E. (2015). Adversity quotient® and school administrators’ leadership skills: basis for leadership enhancement program. Visayas, Philippine: Philippine Normal University.
  7. Bautista, M. J. C., & Josephine, C. (2015). Adversity quotient and teaching performance of faculty members. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(3), 1-6.
  8. Biggs, J. (2003). Aligning teaching and assessment to curriculum objectives. Imaginative Curriculum Project, LTSN Generic Centre, 12.
  9. Calles, A. B., & Besoyo, L. M. (2015). Personal Characteristics and Adversity Quotient of Academic Administrators among Selected State Universities and Colleges in Eastern Visayas, Philippines. Journal of Society & Technology, 5, 122-129.
  10. Canivel, L. D. (2010). Principals’ adversity quotient: Styles, performance, and practices. Unpublished Dissertation.University of Philippines.
  11. Chadha, N. (2021). Adversity quotient: Surviving rather than giving up. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(2), 5942-5947.
  12. Chambers, D., & Lavery, S. (2017). Introduction to Service-Learning and Inclusive Education. In Service-Learning International Perspectives on Inclusive Education, Vol. 12, pp. 3-19. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-363620170000012001
  13. Cornista, G., & Macasaet, C. (2013). Adversity quotient and achievement motivation of selected third-year and fourth-year psychology students of De La Salle Lipa. Unpublished Masters’ Thesis, College of Education Arts and Sciences (De La Salle Lipa).
  14. Creswell, J. W. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  15. Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  16. Cura, J. M., & Gozum, J. L. (2011). A correlational study in the Adversity Quotient.
  17. De Ridder, D. T., Lensvel-Mulders, G., Finkenauer, F., Stock, F. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2012). Taking stock of self-control: A meta-analysis of how trait self-control relates to various behaviours. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(1), 76-99.
  18. Department of Education. (2022, February 9). Implementation of the Results-based Performance Management System-Philipine Professional Standards for Teachers for School Year 2021-2022. Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph/up-content/uploads/2022/02/DM_s2022_004.pdf
  19. DepEd Order 14 s. 2020 Guidelines on the Required Health Standards in Basic Education Offices and Schools
  20. DepEd Order 36 s. 2013 Department of Education Vision, Mission, and Core
  21. DepEd Order 42 s. 2017 National Adoption and Implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers
  22. Division Memorandum no. 1301 s. 2023 Mental Health Month Celebration: Regional Mental Health Summit
  23. Division Memorandum SGOD no. 71 s. 2022 Virtual Mental Health Webinar Series for Teachers  
  24. Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D., & Tsukayama, E. (2012). What No Child Left Behind leaves behind: The roles of IQ and self-control in predicting standardized achievement test scores and report card grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 439.
  25. Federation University (2018), Principles of learning Environment: Accessed 22/09/2019from: https://federation.edu.au/staff/learning-and-teaching/teachingpractice/development/principles-of-learning-environment
  26. Gallego, P. L., & caingcpy, M. E. (2021). Variance in multidimensional competencies and professional development needs of Kindergarten teachers. International Journal of Didactical Studies, 2(2), 101461.https://doi.org/10.33902/IJODS.2021271213
  27. Gay, G. (2003). The importance of multicultural education. Educational Leadership, Dec. 2003, 30-35.
  28. Gepila, E. C. (2020). Assessing teachers using Philippine Standards for Teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 739-746.doi:10.13189/ujer.2020.080302
  29. Gess-Newsome, J., Taylor, J. A., Carlson, J., Gardner, A. L., Wilson, C. D., & Stuhlsatz, M. A. (2019). Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 41(7), 944-963.doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1265158
  30. Groh, S. C. (Ed.). (2015). Classroom Management: Creating Positive Learning Environment. Singapore Person Education Soith Asia Pvt. Ltd. 
  31. Handler, B. (2010). Teacher as curriculum leader: A consideration of the appropriateness of that role assignment to classroom-based practitioners. International Journal of Teacher Leadrship, 3 (3). 32-42.
  32. Hechanova, M. R., Waelde, L., Docena, P. S., Alampay, L. P., Alianan, A. S., Flores, M. J. B., ... & Melgar, M. I. E. (2015). The development and initial evaluation of Katatagan: A resilience intervention for Filipino disaster survivors. https://bit.ly/zNhTOxj
  33. Hembloom, L. (2021). What is Pedagogical Content Knowledge? Pedagogical Content Knowledge.  https://study.com/learn/lesson/pedagogical-content-knowledge.html
  34. Jorilla, C. D., & Bual, J. M. (2020). Demographics as variable in assessing the teaching competence of teachers in catholic schools. Philippine Social Science Journal, 3(2). doi:10.52006/maimv3i2.145
  35. Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluation traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 80.
  36. Kishita, N., & Shimada, H. (2011). Effects of acceptance-based coping on task performance and subjective stress. Journal of behaviour therapy and experimental psychiatry, 42(1), 6-12. https://bit.ly/zTQPNb4
  37. Korna, A. (2014). To bend but not to break. Retrieved from https://aura.antioch.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1176&context=etds Ledesma, J. (2014). Conceptual frameworks and research models on resilience in leadership. July- September 2014: 1-8. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2158244014545464
  38. Liaqat, A. (2018). The design of curriculum, assessment and evaluation in higher education with constructive alignment. Journal of Education and e-Learning research, 5(1), 72-78. ISSN-2518-0169
  39. Makovec, Danijela. 2018. The dimensions of teachers’ professional development. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies 69: 106–25.
  40. Malunes, R. E., & Dioso, D. P. D. (2020). Teaching Competence of Public School Teachers in the Light of the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers. Philippine Social Science Journal, 3 (2), 43-44. https://doi.org/10.52006/main.v3i2.179
  41. Manzon, R. (2021). Perceptions of teachers and principals on their adversity quotient about their job performance. EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD), 6(9), 201-205.
  42. McLachlan, C., Fleer, M., & Edwards, S. (2018). Early Childhood curriculum: Planning, assessment and implementation. New York: Cambridge University Press. 
  43. Ministry of Education and Vocational Training, (2009). National strategy on inclusive education 2009-2017. Final draft. Ministry of education and Vocational Training.
  44. Mwivanda, M., & Kingi, P. (2020). Teachers’ Adversity Quotient Dimension of Ownership: Predictor of Students’ Academic Performance in Public Secondary Schools in Kenya.
  45. Overall, J., & Wise, S. (2016). The antecedents of entrepreneurial success: A mixed methods approach. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 24(3):209-241.
  46. Parto, L. E., & Yango, A. R. (2023). Teaching Competence and Adversity Quotient of Teachers in Alternative Learning System (ALS) and Students’ Learning Engagement in The City Schools Division Offices in the Province of Laguna. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 44, 293.
  47. Parvathy, U., & Praseeda, M. (2014). Relationship between adversity quotient and academic problems among student teachers. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(11), 23-26.
  48. Phoolka, E. S., & Kaur, N. (2012). Adversity Quotient: A new paradigm to explore. Contemporary Business Studies, 3(4), 67-78.
  49. Ratida, S. (2000). Work stress of the psychologists in Bangkok metropolitan administration. Master’s Degree of Science (Clinical Psychology), Mahidol University.
  50. Republic Act 11036 An Act Establishing a National Mental Health Policy to enhance the Delivery of Integrated Mental Health Services, Promoting and Protecting the Rights of persons Utilizing Psychosocial Health Services, Appropriating Funds Therefor and Other Purposes
  51. Roberto, Johnny & Madrigal, D. V. (2019). Teacher Quality in the light of the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers. Philippine Social Science Journal, 1(67). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332103677_Teacher_Qualityinthe_Light_of_the_Philippine_Professional_Standards_for_Teachers
  52. Robles, A. C. (2019). Development and Validation of Educational Video Tutorials for 21st Century Secondary Learners. https://asianjournal.org/online/index.php/ajms/article/view/186.  
  53. Rural, J. (2021). Competency in assessment of selected DepEd Teachers in National Capital Region. European Online Journal of National and Social Sciences, 10(4), 639-646. Retrieved from https://european-science.com/eojnss/article/view/6279
  54. Safi’i, A., Muttaqin, I., Hamzah, N., Chotimah, C., Junaris, I., & Rifa’i, M. K. (2021). The effect of the adversity quotient on student performance, learning autonomy and student achievement in the COVID-19 pandemic era: evidence from Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(12).
  55. Saxena, S., & Rathore, B. (2024). Adversity Quotient as Determining Factor of Mental Health and Professional Quality of Life Among Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review. Annals of Neurosciences, 09727531241231055.
  56. Shen, C. Y. (2014). A study investigating the influence of demographic variables on adversity quotient. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 10(1), 22-32.
  57. Singh, S., & Sharma, T. (2017). The effect of Adversity Quotient on the Occupational Stress of IT Managers in India. Procedia Computer Science, 122: 86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.345
  58. Skaalvik, E.M., and Skaalvik, S. (2018). Job demands and job resources as predictors of teacher motivation and well-being, Soc. Psychol. Educ. 21, 1251-1275. doi:10.1007/s11218-018-9464-8
  59. Stoltz, P. G. (1997). Adversity quotient: Turning obstacles into opportunities. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  60. Stoltz, P. G. (2010). Adversity Quotient Work: Finding your hidden capacity for getting things done. Harper Collins.
  61. Stoltz, Paul G. (2000) Adversity quotient at work, New York, Harper Business.
  62. Suryadi, B., & Santoso, T. I. (2017). Self-Efficacy, Adversity Quotient, and Students’ Achievement in Mathematics. International Education Studies, 10(10), 12-19.
  63. Terrazula, V. E. (2018). DepEd, DOH to address teacher suicides. Manila Bulletin, Published September 19, 2018. https://bit.ly/zPxBCt9Values
  64. Usman, Y. D. & Madudili, C. G. (2019). Evaluation of the Efect of Learning Environment on Student’s Academic Performance in Nigeria. Accessed https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED602386.pdf 
  65. Wach, M., et al. (2020). The buffering effect of social support on the relationship between secondary traumatic stress and burnout among teachers working in crisis contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 586724.
  66. Walters, R. (2020, April 23). Diverse learners. Oklahoma State Department of Education.https://sde.ok.gov/diverse-learners-1#:~:text=Who%20are%20Diverse%20Learners%3F,culturally%2C%20and%20linguistically%20diverse%20backgrounds.
  67. Williams, K. (2022, January 23). What is a learning environment? Learning Environment Types & uses. https://study.com/learn/lesson/learning-environemnr-types-uses.html
  68. Yazon, A. (2019). Pre-service Teachers’ adversity quotient and Proficiency in English Language and Mathematics. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(12), 2670-2676.
  69. Yazon, A. D., & Ang-Manaig, K. (2019). Emotional intelligence and occupational stress among Filipino teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(11), 2303-2313

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic