Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 41 no. 1 (2025)

Follow the Order: A Strategic Intervention Material to Enhance Grade 8 Students’ Understanding of the Periodic Table

Maria Theresa Marlyn Ballesteros | Elsa Cajucom

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The periodic table is a fundamental tool in understanding chemical behavior, yet it remains one of the most challenging topics for many Grades 8 students. School-based assessments have consistently identified it as a least mastered competency due to difficulties in understanding its organization and predictive use. These challenges highlight the need for instructional materials that make deep chemistry concepts more accessible and engaging. This study aimed to develop and validate a Strategic Intervention Material (SIM) titled "Follow the Order" to assist Grade 8 learners in mastering the periodic table. Anchored on competencies outlined in the Philippine K to 12 curriculum, the SIM used student-friendly activities, visual aids, and guided exercises to support learning. It underwent a rigorous validation process by subject matter experts to evaluate its content, format, presentation, accuracy, and up-to-datedness. Results showed that the SIM was rated Very Satisfactory across all domains, with mean scores ranging from 3.46 to 3.94 and low standard deviations, indicating strong agreement among evaluators. The material was conceptually accurate, free of grammatical and factual errors, and appropriate for junior high school learners’ cognitive levels. Illustrations and layout were found clear, relevant, and supportive of student engagement. Readability was assessed using the Flesch Reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level formulas, yielding scores of 60.2 and 5.6, confirming its suitability for students aged 13 to 15. Suggestions from validators were incorporated to improve the material’s quality and usability. While this study focused on development and validation, findings suggest SIM’s strong potential as a supplementary tool in Grade 8 Chemistry. Future research is recommended to evaluate its impact on student achievement, engagement, and retention in actual classroom settings.



References:

  1. Akram, M. Rehman, S.A., Ahmed, F., & Hameed, M. (2017). Investigation of different mechanical properties of commonly available papers. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng., 7 (2) 312–317. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323279765_Investigation_of_Different_Mechanical_Properties_of_Commonly_Available_Papers
  2. Allonar, J., Salic-Hairulla, M. A., Orbita, R. R., Bagaloyos, J. B., & Adamat, L. A. (2024, August 31). Development of Contextualized Strategic Intervention Materials (CSIMs) in ecosystem. https://so13.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/J_IAMSTEM/article/view/916
  3. Amua-Sekyi, E. T. (2016). Assessment, student learning and classroom practice: A review. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(21), 1–6. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/31965
  4. Bonitez, Aurea (2021). Effectiveness of Science Strategic Intervention Material in Elevating the Performance Level of Grade Seven Students. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 2, p. 18-31, june 2021. ISSN 2682-8138. Available at: https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijares/article/view/13481
  5. Carroll, G., & Park, S. (2024). Towards expansive model-based teaching: A systematic synthesis of modelling pedagogies in science education literature. Studies in Science Education, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2024.2417157
  6. Counihan, B. (2022). An open educational resource for teaching revision: Flesch-Kincaid Readability Statistics. HETS Online Journal, 11(2), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.55420/2693.9193.v11.n2.40
  7. Dela Mines, R, & Cajucom, E. (2022). evaluation of proposed General Chemistry learning modules by experts and teachers. IJCER (International Journal of Chemistry Education Research), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.20885/ijcer.vol6.iss2.art7
  8. Department of Education. (2015, April 1). DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015: Policy guidelines on classroom assessment for the K to 12 Basic Education Program. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2015/04/01/do-8-s-2015-policy-guidelines-on-classroom-assessment-for-the-k-to-12-basic-education-program/
  9. Department of Education. (2020, October 2). DepEd Order No. 31, s. 2020: Interim guidelines for assessment and grading in light of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2020/10/02/october-2-2020-do-031-s-2020-interim-guidelines-for-assessment-and-grading-in-light-of-the-basic-education-learning-continuity-plan/
  10. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  11. Kortum, P., & Sorber, M. (2015). Measuring the usability of mobile applications for phones and tablets. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(8), 518–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1064658
  12. Lazo, D. & de Guzman, M. (2021). Strategic Intervention Material: A Learning Approach in Teaching Economics during the Distance Education. Int. J. Comput. Eng. Res. Trends, 8 (5), pp. 76–84. https://www.ijcert.org/index.php/ijcert/article/view/653
  13. Nunoo, F. K. N., Anane-Antwi, E., Mensah, D. P., Nunoo, I. E., & Brew-Hammond, A. (2022). Readability analyses of integrated science textbooks for junior high schools in Ghana. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 17(2), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v17i2.6
  14. O’Donoghue, J., Doménech, N. G., McArdle, F., Connolly, M., Lang, Y., & McGoldrick, N. (2023). Current Chemistry Investigators (CCI): Development and evaluation of a scientist in a classroom electrochemistry workshop. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(10), 4138–4146. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00515
  15. Paras, S. B. (2019). Use of modified strategic intervention material in enhancing the performance of the Grade Five pupils [PDF]. Department of Education Region I. https://depedro1.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Sherwin-Paras.pdf
  16. Raslan, G. (2024). The impact of the Zone of Proximal Development Concept (Scaffolding) on the students problem solving skills and learning outcomes. In Lecture notes in civil engineering (pp. 59–66). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56121-4_6
  17. Sadsad, M. (2022). Utilizing the competency-based strategic intervention materials as tools to assess performance of students in Grade 9 Physical Education. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies, Philippines, 2022. https://www.ijams-bbp.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/IJAMS-JULY-ISSUE-76-107.pdf
  18. Salviejo, E. I., Aranes, F. Q., & Espinosa, A. A. (2014, February 28). Strategic Intervention Material-Based instruction, learning approach and students‘ performance in chemistry. https://ijlter.myres.net/index.php/ijlter/article/view/1216
  19. Setiabudi, A., Mulyadi, M., & Puspita, H. (2019). An analysis of validity and Reliability of a Teacher-Made Test. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 3(4), 522–532. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.3.4.522-532.
  20. Yambi, T. (2018). ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION. Iscedhuila. https://www.academia.edu/35685843/ASSESSMENT_AND_EVALUATION_IN_EDUCATION.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic