Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 40 no. 5 (2025)

The Use of Interactive Video as a Supplementary Teaching Tool in Learning

Honey Mae Samson | Wilfredo Miasco | Ely Jay Pasco

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study examined the academic performance of Grade 8 students in Araling Panlipunan at Lourdes Integrated School when exposed and not exposed to interactive video as a supplementary learning tool. It also explored the relationship between students’ academic performance and their level of engagement. Utilizing a quasi-experimental research design, the study involved 50 students selected through total population sampling combined with a cluster sampling approach. Participants completed both pre-tests and post-tests. Quantitative data were analyzed using Pearson’s product-moment correlation. The findings revealed that students exposed to interactive videos demonstrated higher academic performance compared to those who were not. Additionally, these students exhibited a higher level of cognitive and emotional engagement during lessons. A moderate to strong positive correlation was found between engagement scores and post-test results, indicating that increased student engagement is strongly associated with improved academic outcomes. Based on the results, the study recommends the use of interactive videos that are aligned with curriculum objectives and designed to accommodate diverse learning styles. It also emphasizes the importance of ensuring accessibility for all learners, regardless of technical skills or internet connectivity. Lastly, continuous evaluation and refinement of interactive video materials are encouraged to maintain their effectiveness, relevance, and engagement value in the learning process.



References:

  1. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, C. A. (n.d.). Likert scales and data analyses. Quality Progress, 40, 64–65.
  2. Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). Cluster sampling. Retrieved [Date Accessed], from https://www.cambridge.org/
  3. Chu, H. C. (2017). Using interactive video to enhance student motivation and performance: A quasi-experimental study.
  4. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (n.d.). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
  5. Dalal, M., & Seipold, J. (2016). The impact of interactive video on educational outcomes: A literature review.
  6. DeLozier, S. J., & Rhodes, M. G. (2019). The impact of interactive videos on learning: A meta-analysis.
  7. Derryberry, A., & Pumpian, L. (n.d.). The effect of interactive video on student engagement in learning. Journal of Educational Technology, 15, 102–114.
  8. Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (n.d.). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons.
  9. Dominican University. (n.d.). Research methods. Retrieved [Date Accessed], from https://scholar.dominican.edu/
  10. ERIC. (n.d.). The effectiveness of interactive video in education: A review of the literature. Retrieved [Date Accessed], from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED570123
  11. Faculty Focus. (n.d.). Engaging students asynchronously with interactive videos. Faculty Focus. Retrieved [Date Accessed], from https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/online-education/online-course-delivery-and-instruction/engaging-students-asynchronously-with-interactive-videos/
  12. Forms.app. (2023, April 23). What is quasi-experimental research: Types & examples. Retrieved [Date Accessed], from https://forms.app/en/blog/quasi-experimental-research
  13. Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (n.d.). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for distance education. Routledge.
  14. Giannakos, M. N., & Chrisochoides, N. (2015). Users’ engagement with interactive videos: An empirical study.
  15. Giannakos, M. N., & Jaccheri, L. (2014). Investigating the factors affecting the adoption of interactive video in education.
  16. Hsieh, M.-C., Lee, C.-C., & Wu, Y.-T. (2017). Effects of interactive video on learning outcomes in a physics course. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 26(1-2), 5-20.
  17. Hsin, W. J., & Cigas, J. (2020). Interactive video for online education: A systematic review.
  18. Hwang, G. J., & Chang, T. S. (n.d.). Barriers to implementing interactive video in education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 127, 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.009
  19. Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., & Chen, C. H. (n.d.). Applications, impacts and trends of interactive multimedia in education: A systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 25, 528–544.
  20. Iowa State University Library. (2024, September 11). Quasi-experimental design - Research methodologies guide. Retrieved [Date Accessed], from https://instr.iastate.libguides.com/researchmethods/quasiexperimental
  21. Jang, S. J., & Kim, Y. W. (2019). Examining the effects of interactive video on student learning outcomes: A meta-analysis.
  22. Jansen, B. J., & Birk, S. (n.d.). Barriers to effective use of interactive video in learning environments. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8, 506–512. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.7.1075
  23. Kay, R. H. (2020). Exploring the use of video podcasts in education: A comprehensive review of the literature.
  24. Khalil, M. K., & Mansor, H. (n.d.). The effectiveness of immediate feedback in learning environments: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 6, 25–36.
  25. Kim, J., Lee, Y., & Kim, B. (2015). The effects of interactive video on learning motivation and outcomes in a language course. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 7(1), 1-22.
  26. Lanzing, J. (2017). Accessible interactive video for inclusive education. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 7(1), 1-15.
  27. Mindstamp. (n.d.). Interactive video for education. Retrieved [Date Accessed], from https://mindstamp.com/uses/education
  28. Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2016). Student engagement and educational outcomes in interactive e-learning environments.
  29. O’Sullivan, S., & McNamara, M. (n.d.). Understanding barriers to the adoption of interactive video in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49, 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520908564
  30. Reeve, J. (n.d.). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 579–595.
  31. Scribbr. (n.d.). Sampling techniques. Retrieved [Date Accessed], from [URL]
  32. Yoon, S. W., & Lim, D. H. (2017). The effects of multimedia learning content in a corporate e-learning environment.
  33. Zhao, Y., & Kemp, L. (2021). The role of interactive videos in higher education: A meta-analysis
 

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic