HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 41 no. 3 (2025)

Enhancing Collaborative Decision-Making in Public Schools Through Distributed Leadership

Regine Rance | Jennifer Certifico | Cristie Ibaya | Dina Lucernas | Juliet Rance-Rigon

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The research "The Role of Distributed Leadership in Enhancing Collaborative Decision-Making in Schools" examined the ways in which distributed leadership affects collaborative decision-making in educational institutions. In particular, it aimed to address the following questions: 1. What are the roles of distributed leadership in advancing collaborative decision-making within schools? 2. What are the challenges faced by the school leaders in adopting distributed leadership for decision-making? and 3. What are the effective approaches in promoting and maintaining distributed leadership to foster collaborative decision-making in schools? More collaborative models are displacing traditional top-down models of leadership and aligning the collective know-how of different stakeholders. The study adopted a quantitative methodology with rating scale and weighted mean as statistical tools. There were 50 school heads randomly selected from Masbate Province to determine how distributed leadership can enhance decisionmaking processes. The results showed distributed leadership to have a marked impact on collaborative decisionmaking through enhancing shared responsibility culture, promoting diverse views, and enabling staff to assume leadership but challenges such as opposition to new leadership styles, limited time, and coordinating autonomy and accountability were seen. Further, there were effective strategies identified which include empowerment through delegation, open communication, and developing leadership teams. The research put forward suggestions that establishing trust-based culture and encouraging professional development are essential for distributed leadership to be effectively implemented. The conclusions made from the research emphasized that even though distributed leadership aids in collective decision-making, overcoming challenges such as resistance and time pressures is instrumental. Thus, it was suggested to prioritize professional development, conduct regular leadership training programs, and invest in distributed leadership. These actions can enable school leaders to increase collaborative decision-making and establish a more inclusive and effective leadership culture in schools.



References:

  1. Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2014). School leadership models: What do we know? School Leadership & Management, 34(5), 553-571.
  2. Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2016). Distributed leadership in schools: How does it add value? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 34-51.
  3. Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2018). Distributed leadership in schools: Still misunderstood or misrepresented? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(6), 888-904.
  4. Cardno, C. (2012). Managing effective relationships in education. SAGE Publications.
  5. Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership: What we know. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 7(2), 147-170.
  6. Harris, A. (2014). Distributed leadership matters: Perspectives, practicalities, and potential. Corwin Press.
  7. Harris, A. (2014). Distributed leadership and school improvement: Leading or misleading? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(5), 563-575.
  8. Harris, A., & Spillane, J. (2016). Distributed leadership in practice: Evidence and implications. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 3-18.
  9. Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Distributed leadership in schools: Does system policy make a difference? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(5), 654-678.
  10. Lambert, L. (2002). A framework for shared leadership. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 37-40.
  11. Lambert, L. (2015). Building leadership capacity in schools. Educational Leadership, 62(3), 42-47.
  12. Lambert, L. (2019). Building leadership capacity in schools. Educational Leadership, 58(8), 37-40.
  13. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2009). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 28(1), 27-42.
  14. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2017). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 38(1), 5-20.
  15. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5-22.
  16. Mayrowetz, D. (2008). Making sense of distributed leadership: Exploring the multiple usages of the concept in the field. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(3), 424-435.
  17. Spillane, J. P. (2015). Distributed leadership in practice. Teachers College Press.
  18. Spillane, J. P., & Diamond, J. B. (2007). Distributed leadership in practice. Teachers College Press.
  19. Timperley, H. (2005). Distributed leadership: Developing theory from practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(4), 395-420.
  20. Timperley, H. (2020). Challenging assumptions about distributed leadership in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(2), 175-188.